Ahh, so this is really something else
entirely, this is more SDN, Software Defined Networking as the
buzzwords dub it. MS is just putting SDN controller software on
linux as hell, they need it stable, and even they know it wouldn't
be that on windoze.
I have to agree VB with Seamless is really slick.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Michael Butash wrote:
> Also of note, I've never had real success with wine for anything other
> than diablo, but I really like using seamless mode under virtualbox. I use
> that running 2 windoze systems (my wor
Also of note, I've never had real
success with wine for anything other than diablo, but I really
like using seamless mode under virtualbox. I use that running 2
windoze systems (my work image and a personal with my old office),
and it works quite slick across all
http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/microsoft-showcases-the-azure-cloud-switch-acs/
Real deal however.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Michael Butash wrote:
> I agree to some extent, I have tried lucidcharts, and eventually plan to
> move to that, though I cannot do nearly as detailed work i
I agree to some extent, I have tried
lucidcharts, and eventually plan to move to that, though I cannot
do nearly as detailed work in network diagrams as I do in visio
with lucid.
I also have a 1.5yr old issue with lucid that their layer import
methods
The Register is the British version of The Onion, but with a bit more
refinement. See other The Register articles such as:
'She said she was just giving me a WRISTJOB but actually she got PREGNANT,
http://www.the register.co.UK/2015/09/17/apple_watch_pregnancy_test/ which
makes fun of the high pr
lucidchart was surprisingly good as a replacement for visio.
but i have to agree with alot of this. and i think office 365 is getting
stable under wine again so it should be viable in that environment soon if
not already.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Michael Butash wrote:
> I think they jus
I think they just have enough demand
for interoperation between linux and azure (hyperv) that they are
forced to support linux just to keep their users happy. They
can't avoid it, proven they can't defeat it, so they're only left
to play nicely or eventually be r
heheh. well, with MS, you never can tell. Besides, isn't it almost 10 months
past April Fools day?
-eric
On Sep 18, 2015, at 9:27 AM, Keith Smith wrote:
>
> Perhaps it is a trick?
>
> On 2015-09-17 23:59, Eric Oyen wrote:
>> it was bound to happen sooner or later. perhaps they finally got a
>
I think a more interesting question is … what implications does this have on
the (silly) legislation proposed that would make it illegal to tamper with
device firmware?
(The intent behind the legislation appears somewhat vague, but generally tied
to legitimate security concerns.)
This would se
Check's date... not april fool's day
damn... it's the end of the world!
On 2015-09-17 23:59, Eric Oyen wrote:
> it was bound to happen sooner or later. perhaps they finally got a brain.
>
> -eric
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/18/microsoft_has_developed_its_own_linux_repeat_mi
I doubt it. it does explain the code that MS has been contributing to Linux
a little bit more.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Michael Havens wrote:
> or a joke.
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Keith Smith
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Perhaps it is a trick?
>>
>> On 2015-09-17 23:59, Eric Oyen wrot
or a joke.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Keith Smith
wrote:
>
> Perhaps it is a trick?
>
> On 2015-09-17 23:59, Eric Oyen wrote:
>
>> it was bound to happen sooner or later. perhaps they finally got a
>> brain.
>>
>> -eric
>>
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/18/microsoft_has_develo
Perhaps it is a trick?
On 2015-09-17 23:59, Eric Oyen wrote:
it was bound to happen sooner or later. perhaps they finally got a
brain.
-eric
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/18/microsoft_has_developed_its_own_linux_repeat_microsoft_has_developed_its_own_linux/?mt=1442559356305
[1]
Link
well, it took them long enough (like about 32 years). They tried for at least
15 of those years to put Linux out of the market (and it's still here). That is
the funny thing about inevitability, you will always have to bow to it
eventually.
-eric
On Sep 18, 2015, at 4:56 AM, Stephen Partington
Makes to much sense for them not to.
The new ms is a changed animal.
On Sep 17, 2015 11:59 PM, "Eric Oyen" wrote:
> it was bound to happen sooner or later. perhaps they finally got a brain.
>
> -eric
>
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/18/microsoft_has_developed_its_own_linux_repeat_micro
it was bound to happen sooner or later. perhaps they finally got a brain.
-eric
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/18/microsoft_has_developed_its_own_linux_repeat_microsoft_has_developed_its_own_linux/?mt=1442559356305
---
PLUG-discuss mailing li
17 matches
Mail list logo
