the mistake of hitting the
group with something (and apologizing).
Scott
--
Scott Wiersdorf
sc...@perlcode.org
, you might
notice that when each put() call is made, a newline (by default) is
added to the output. So in essence you've been adding extra newlines,
which has probably caused the problem.
Scott
--
Scott Wiersdorf
sc...@perlcode.org
in the making (working nights and weekends
can only get you so far, so fast). The website is
http://www.glassbead.net/ (signup and play is free, and we have a
tournament this Saturday--come play or just come watch if you
like. I'm user 'scott' in the game).
POE is our messaging engine between the Flash
application that was doing sort of the same thing. I'm just guessing
here (i.e., untested code may break things!).
HTH,
Scott
--
Scott Wiersdorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the next newline.
This behavior is all configurable, naturally.
Cheers,
Scott S. McCoy
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 14:28 -0800, vidals wrote:
I have an app that I wrote which is sensitive to being overwhelmed by
POE's multitasking. I couldn't figure out a way to slow it down and
run serially, so I
as it used to be, and then in
some future date he (or some other ambitious person) could add in the
optional keep-alive semantics if it were popular enough to warrant
it.
Scott
--
Scott Wiersdorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alternatively you could use POE::Component::Server::SimpleHTTP
On 12/6/05, Pedro Melo Cunha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks,
I missed that from the docs, I'm must be blind or something. :(
Sorry bout that.
On Dec 6, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Mathieu Longtin wrote:
In the content handler,
if POE has been validated to work on RedHat Linux with
Perl2Exe?
I've made it work with Win32, but will also need to make it work on HP-UX,
AIX and Solaris.
Best Regards,
Scott Neibarger
, it
could be.
Also What is the Bind Address and port . I do not understand this term
clearly.
It's the local address the program binds to when connecting. It's passed along
to POE::Wheel::SocketFactory as the BindAddress argument.
Cheers,
Scott
more information.
- Scott
On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 11:01, Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:35:47AM -0800, Scott Beck wrote:
Hola,
Currently I am working on a Perl client class for Y Windows
(http://www.y-windows.org). My Y class currently acts like a
POE::Component in that it creates it's own session
) {
$parent-dispatch_event($signal_name, @params);
}
}
}
Thanks,
Scott
--
Scott Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gossamer Threads
.
Cheers,
Scott
--
Scott Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gossamer Threads
in an easier to follow fasion.
- Scott
the session and not providing access
to other session specific methods is a great arguement for not putting
event routing in the session object itself. Consistency is very
important in maintaining an API that makes sense to anyone.
- Scott
Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 07:37:02PM -0800, Scott wrote:
The difference is very favorable, here are my benchmark results:
POE::Kernel-call(): 123 wallclock secs (111.82 usr + 0.86 sys = 112.68
CPU) @ 8874.69/s (n=100)
POE::Kernel-invoke(): 33 wallclock secs (28.74
-new(InputLiteral = END\n);
This is of course assuming END\n will NEVER occur in your arbitrary
number of lines here segment.
But again, it would definitely be most accurate to write your own filter.
- Scott
looking at next thursday?
- Scott
checks for or assumes it.
- Scott
forcibly sane, you cannot operate on another sessions aliases...you dont
have that option (Without delving deeply into shit thats very obvious
you really shouldn't be delving into anyway, that is).
And thats my response to that.
- Scott
for the method, I'll gladly change the patch and resubmit.
test-output.err: Debug output from make test on my tree
test_invoke.pl: Benchmark for testing invoke() state
POE-Kernel.patch: Patchset for lib/POE/Kernel.pm
POE-Wheel.patch: Patchset for lib/POE/Wheel/
- Scott
ev enqueued event 1
Tim Wood wrote:
At 07:37 PM 02/18/04, Scott wrote:
In response to an agreement that it would in fact be beneficial to follow the pattern of POE::Kernel-yield rather than implement invoking in the session object, attached is the patchset and benchmarks for a new POE::Kernel-invoke method
Scott wrote:
Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:00:01PM -0800, Scott wrote:
Rocco Caputo wrote:
I'm glad you don't support inter-session calling. You really can't do
that without at least setting POE::Kernel's notion of the active
session. Otherwise a callee's alarms
Scott wrote:
Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:00:01PM -0800, Scott wrote:
Rocco Caputo wrote:
I'm glad you don't support inter-session calling. You really can't do
that without at least setting POE::Kernel's notion of the active
session. Otherwise a callee's alarms
the POE Framework to let POE do its
thing, and stops people from doing things like creating sessions just
for the sake of creating sessions.
- Scott
Nick Williams wrote:
Scott wrote:
[...]
If you're really only storing data, you really should use an object
OR package in the ways I mentioned above. Atleast, if you have any
desire to maintain efficiency.
Now here I must note, that I didn't come up with the idea of removing
inter-session
-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: POE::Session-call()
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
Nick Williams wrote:
Scott wrote:
Nick Williams wrote:
Scott wrote:
[...]
If you're really only storing data, you really should use an object
OR package in the ways I mentioned above. Atleast, if you have any
desire to maintain efficiency.
Now here I must note, that I didn't come up
Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:54:24AM -0800, Scott wrote:
Not everything needs to be an event, or so Rocco once told me.
True, but POE is nice because you /can/ make everything an event, if
you so desire.
Yes but this still isn't an arguement for inter
Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:02:27PM -0800, Scott wrote:
There was a problem with this patch, which unlikely got noticed due
to the fact that it would not have caused an error until you used the
ReadWrite wheel with a depricated filter object. The test suite does
Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:00:01PM -0800, Scott wrote:
Rocco Caputo wrote:
I'm glad you don't support inter-session calling. You really can't do
that without at least setting POE::Kernel's notion of the active
session. Otherwise a callee's alarms (and other resources
or
conditions of its implimentation prior to being applied to the current
cvs tree, please let me know. I will try to meet all prerequesites, as I
would like to see this patch applied in the next release.
- Scott
Common subdirectories: poe/lib/POE/API and poe.session.call/lib/POE/API
Common subdirectories
a loose representation of
where the author thinks the code is in terms of stability and the only
rule for versions is it must be changed from release to release. Just
MHO.
Cheers,
Scott
--
Scott Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gossamer Threads
On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 18:38, sungo wrote:
Drop support for any perl versions earlier than 5.6.1.
dropping support for =5.8.2 is O.K. with me :)
--
Scott Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gossamer Threads
be a balanced list passed as an array reference, as the
HTTP::Request::Common documentation suggests.
$kernel-post( ua = request = got_response = POST $url [ name = value ]);
- Scott
Michael wrote:
Does anyone have an example on a http post instead
of the http-get
in the following example...
http
! This is long winded! My apologies for that. I'll appreciate
whatever advice you can offer, however brief.
Scott
--
Scott Flinn
+=
| Research Officer, Human Web Group
| National Research Council Canada
| Institute
5828 Reeds Road Main: 913.384.1008
Mission, KS 66202 Fax: 913.384.2180
www.scriptpro.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Scott
--
Scott Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gossamer Threads
When you implement an exception-processing mechanism I assume it will be called
POE::Try
?
--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies
. Maybe
this is a dumb question, but why no such event?
Peter Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.perldebugged.com
guts of POE to know whether this is feasible;
what about all the fds the parent is selecting on, what does the child do
with those, etc. What are the potential pitfalls?
Yes, I could put the code in a string and just exec perl and print this to
it. But this looks cooler.
--
Peter Scott
Pa
At 10:44 PM 3/2/01 -0500, Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Thu, 01 Mar 2001 23:15:44 -0800, Peter Scott wrote:
I'm constructing a daemon to respond to user questions about various
services, e.g., is sendmail on such-and-such host working, is the web
server on another host working, etc; I just came
41 matches
Mail list logo
