this
for me, regardless of whether it breaks other people's code. Is that an
accurate summary?
--
sungo
http://sungo.us
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
::API::Peek has some memory-size-grabbing features that might
be helpful and use Devel::Size
sungo
the documentation. I
apologize for that. I amm CCing the poe mailing list in the hopes that
someone with more time than I will clean up the documentation in this
regard.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
pgpJnH5YRGbsg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On (02/26 03:12), Rocco Caputo wrote:
Does anyone have suggestions for naming its stand-alone distribution?
Filter::PreProcessor
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
pgprGhHqBVebI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On (12/29 13:31), Dave C wrote:
Is there a recommended Best Practices for debugging memory consumption in
POE?
POE::API::Peek has several methods for getting the approximate memory
consumption of sessions or the whole POE environment.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
pgpxncH0i3A6l.pgp
Description
success. We're actually recording the
approximate memory footprint of each session so we can determine which
subsystem is causing memory bloat. because of the Devel::Size's
problems, its only approximate but its way better than nothing.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
to restart it. Last thing we need is
non-technical drama on this list.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
to
work well for intro/tutorial work. let me know if you want to use them
in any form beyond their currently published forms. pesky publishers ;P
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
On (04/24 01:52), Jonathan Gill wrote:
Um, is it my end screwing around or did someone forget to register the
perl.org domain?
its you.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
]) is going. and the
poe.perl.org website is up and sending the normal content.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
I think it's a bug.
I expected the following short program to print My name is Tim
followed by My name is Mud. Instead, this is the output:
you are misusing the poe session constructor. you really want to put any and
all custom data into the heap. the heap is passed into all state callbacks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| It probably still needs to be fixed in POE::Session though.
at this point, i think my suggested fix would be to add scary comments
in the documentation warning folks not to try this at home.
- --
sungo
http://eekeek.org
the conversation and i've never
figured out whether that meant that i hit a home run or totally scared
everyone off :)
- --
sungo
http://eekeek.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCAC3w5xrCYZCVAioRAv2GAKCfPoqoypo9R/X9vw/VBDS89o1wSgCgjtai
JPQHB3HApJyqEl8pvRjqPzI
() is not
tested at all that i can see. bleh. wonder how i forgot about a little
thing like put()...
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
Try everything once except incest and folk dancing. --Sir Thomas Beecham
pgpPGkjBWkKR1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On (12/09 10:44), Mathieu Longtin wrote:
I just noticed that some pre-release of version 0.30 of POE
were on CPAN.
.3003 is not a prerelease. its a full on stable release.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
Try everything once except incest and folk dancing. --Sir Thomas Beecham
pgppwhchhFvnu.pgp
points you to _dispatch_event in the
Kernel space. look at its argument list to figure out which data you
care about and want to log.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
Try everything once except incest and folk dancing. --Sir Thomas Beecham
pgpkVpuIPJFK3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
Try everything once except incest and folk dancing. --Sir Thomas Beecham
pgpUDEm5whzlt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
doesn't have a listener! unless ref $tcpheap-{listener};
+$tcpheap-{listener}-autopause(1);
what's the XXX for? is there something missing from the patch or
something remains to be implemented?
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
Try everything once except incest and folk dancing. --Sir Thomas Beecham
to make
and test patches)?
just a quorom and a decision. it'd be pretty trivial to implement. but
either way, i dont want to touch it until after .30 gets out.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
pgpxXnTE7Ewaj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that was false hope. *shrug*
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
On (11/09 22:13), Markus M?ller wrote:
Strictly seen, you?re right. The RFC needs \r\n. But you shouldn?t
ignore that this RFC is very old.
the tcp spec is old and we still follow it. if the rfc says \r\n, that's
what you should send and what you should expect.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
for any variance, that would be grand. but it doesnt.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
should
compensate accordingly.
its too bad i cant show you this little app that's very common at
$day_job that unambiguously sends \n delimiters but will only accept
\r\n in the response.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
On (10/18 15:44), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a kernel method to give me a list of all my sessions?
I want to send an event to them all
POE::API::Peek may be able to help you there.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
On (10/13 19:02), Martijn van Beers wrote:
Hi, how about we deprecate POE::Session-new
+1 vote from me
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
, the worker sessions will all
be gone and poe will shut down cleanly.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
On (10/01 10:48), Milscvaer wrote:
I am not an expert in working in XS
no one is an expert in XS except the Dark Lord himself.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
On (09/07 10:02), Leon Brocard wrote:
It is now mid-2004. Where did the money go and have you begun work on
this yet?
let me put this out in email since i've put it out in irc and in person.
i'm will to help with this if help is willing to be accepted. just need
a direction.
--
sungo
http
On (08/06 01:50), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me through my vote in for POEx.
Agreed. i like POEx a lot. makes it very clear what is in core and what
is not.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
where we want notification of the Foo event.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
On (03/17 21:11), Alex J. Avriette wrote:
Additionally, it is rumored that there will be a chapter on poe programming
in the new edition of Advanced Perl Programming.
no rumor. is fact.
way back when, there were several of us interested in writing poe books.
we talked about writing a big big
On (02/24 11:20), Exide Arabellan wrote:
When printing a line to the users console...
$poe_kernel-post( $user = send = message );
using what module? what code? the 'send' event there could be anyone's
code from anywhere. kinda hard to debug from here :)
--
Matt Cashner
On (02/24 19:59), Alex J. Avriette wrote:
Details are at http://vienna.pm.org/workshop.html. There's still
plenty of time to submit papers or set up a talk with Thomas. He can
be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that website is not in english.
:)
--
Matt Cashner
http://eekeek.org
eek at eekeek
On (02/24 20:32), Alex J. Avriette wrote:
You planning on going to Austria? I figured that the usual attendees of
an event in austria would read german.
but ... but... vienna's just down the road and they don't SPEAK
german...
--
Matt Cashner
http://eekeek.org
eek at eekeek dot org
i seem to have deleted rocco's original mail before responding to it. oh
well.
so the question is: newbies seem to not understand $_[KERNEL] and
friends. what to do about it?
my answer is this: POE::Sweeten::Args, written by Casey West,
specifically to alleviate this problem. Let's document it
On (02/19 21:49), Scott wrote:
But it could result in
some very miffed new users screaming Why the hell cant you do this?.
funny. i thought that's what i was saying here.
why can't i post an event to another session from that session's object?
Basically, we simply have to check to ensure
On (02/07 15:53), Rocco Caputo wrote:
I think the tests should be generated at make test time. We get a
smaller distribution this way.
you've never been terribly concerned about a really small distribution
before. we've shipped 10K of examples until really recently. i'd much
rather ship 10K
On (02/07 15:22), Rocco Caputo wrote:
Signal reform is not quite done. We're still dispatching _signal,
albeit with great reluctance.
why? kill this beast already.
To me, a 1.0 release implies a certain measure of spit and polish that
the documentation (and perhaps the installer) lack.
On (02/14 06:53), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taking Chris' question further... why not implement wait queues (I'm
thinking along the lines of NT).
+1 on wait queues. i think there are evil and wonderful things that
could be done with them.
--
Matt Cashner
http://eekeek.org
eek at eekeek dot org
On (02/19 08:00), Jay Strauss wrote:
If I want to read the socket manually, Wheel::ReadWrite (I think) is going
to present the same problem as Component::TCP::Client, that is, every time
some data comes down the pipe it's going to invoke an event.
yeah. this is kind of the core of what poe
On (02/19 11:01), Rocco Caputo wrote:
You work with the wackiest protocols. Can you fit all this magic into a
filter instead of writing an entire server from scratch?
maybe wacky but pretty common. what he's describing sounds a bit like a
set of protocols we have at work. they're LOTS of fun
On (02/19 18:58), Scott wrote:
There are three answers to this. One is maintaining API sanity:
well, i'm not sure its sanity we're maintaining in keeping all these
session-only methods in the kernel. its a small matter but its one that
mildly irritates me.
The second is a weird form of
On (02/15 11:01), Jay Strauss wrote:
Basically, I'd like to start a POE::Component::Client::TCP, then continue
sequential processing.
Sorta like:
use strict;
use POE qw(Component::Client::TCP);
POE::Component::Client::TCP-new(
...
);
POE::Session-create(
inline_states = {
On (02/15 12:51), Jay Strauss wrote:
But nothing happens. If I change post to yield then I call the
processRecord subroutine is called. Why is that?
post() sends events to specific sessions. yield() sends events to the
current session.
from perldoc POE::Kernel:
post SESSION, EVENT_NAME,
On (02/06 21:31), Chris Fedde wrote:
1.0 is a line in the sand. To some it implies a commitment to interface. To
others it means yet another buggy .0 release. If my opinion matters at all
I'd say hit 0.5 and 0.8 before jumping to 1.0. Then move quickly to 1.1.
so you're against lines? or
On (02/04 04:14), Rocco Caputo wrote:
Thanks for the reply. http://poe.perl.org/?POE_RFCs/Test_Reforms has
been harshly (and incompletely, but it's like 03:00 here) revised based
so, we've gone from our current test suite which is not complete but
workable to a proposed test suite which
On (02/04 04:14), Rocco Caputo wrote:
So in practice the wiki's a flop.
i don't think i'd say that. the Cookbook alone makes it a success.
but the wiki is not a project management or team collaboration tool. its
just a web site. esp since watching the wiki for new content is an
active
ok folks. who's planning on giving poe talks this year? i'm thinking
about it but i don't want to overlap or blow out of the water talks by
people smarter than myself :)
--
Matt Cashner
http://eekeek.org
eek at eekeek dot org
On (11/10 08:20), PerlDiscuss - Perl Newsgroups and mailing lists wrote:
How is the status of support of wheel::run on win32. Or some work around?
broken. and probably will stay that way until someone quite godlike
fixes fork+exec on windows
__
Matt Cashner
http://eekeek.org
eek at eekeek.org
Which is not entirely its fault. I've been waffling over the right way
to incorporate SSL into POE itself. My current favorite is a
Wheel::ReadWrite method to enable SSL. Drawbacks include Yet Another
Dependency for POE's installer.
subclass Wheel::ReadWrite and release it independently.
Ross Williamson wrote:
Gents,
I've just upgraded to POE 0.27 with the full depreciation of _signal
there is now a fatal error in
POE::Component::Server::HTTP line 65.
There may need to be an additional release to cover this.
that's exactly what's needed. we've been warning sky about this for
Rocco Caputo wrote:
I have heard conflicting stories about whether the time shift is
significant. Jeff Bisbee posted that systems based on UTC don't see
shifts in time() when DST/Standard arrive. Matt Cashner is convinced
that NTP prevents the problem from occurring.
the combination of those
Sam Vilain wrote:
If you're going to ignore the appropriate module, you should at least
also disassociate from the terminal and set a new process session ID:
i developed that methodology BEFORE the module even existed so NYEH :)
--
Matt Cashner
http://eekeek.org
check out
http://gtmcknight.com/buttons/index.php
for more neato buttons :)
Matt Cashner
http://eekeek.org
sungo at eekeek dot org
Please Assume This Phone Is Tapped
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Long ago (0.17 days), a bug was found in linux which resulted in a
kernel lock when a select with a timeout of 0 was set. it appears that
this issue is no longer an issue and so the workaround is no longer
needed on newer kernels. Also, there is a speed concern here. Under
linux, the smallest
On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 02:19 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Nancy I've moved up to RedHat 8.0,
Nancy perl 5.8.0 built for i386-linux-thread-multi
Nancy poe 0.24
Oh dear. I developed it under Perl5.8. Did POE change in some
breaking way?
the issue here is more likely to be the
On (12/16/02 13:33), Dmitri Tikhonov wrote:
err ... what happened here? I'm getting one of those domain-hosing
portal sites.
www.perl.org seems ok, though.
Is anybody else experiencing this?
yeah, there was a dns mixup this morning. its been resolved (har) now
and as soon as your
On (12/16/02 10:44), Dennis Taylor wrote:
Yes. The problem seems to be that poe.perl.org is a CNAME to
poe.eekeek.org, and the owner of that domain (Matt Cashner) forgot to
renew it. Whoops.
not at all actually. poe.eekeek.org is (was an A record pointed at a web
host). the host's ip
On (12/16/02 11:05), Dennis Taylor wrote:
Good to hear that it's unrelated. But the domain still expired a
week ago, so you might want to have a chat with them about that too. :-)
no that's dotster's fault. apparently 'auto-renew' means 'delete all
pertinent information'
On Saturday, August 10, 2002, at 02:18 PM, Rocco Caputo wrote:
I would like to avoid preprocessing if at all possible. Even source
filters cause problems with some people-- especially those who want to
deploy programs using perlapp or perl2exe. I think I would start over
if it came to
i have the sad duty to announce that once again POE reigns supreme at
finding perl bugs. We are currently experiencing some problems with
5.8.0 compiled with ithread support.
The problem manifests itself in a few ways. in t/08_errors.t, a message
will get dumped to STDERR that looks like
On Saturday, August 10, 2002, at 03:03 PM, Rocco Caputo wrote:
Umm... I solved this already. POE::Preprocessor now honors the
POE_PREPROC_DUMP environment variable. It should be set to the base
directory where POE::Preprocessor will excrete expanded files.
Subdirectories of
62 matches
Mail list logo
