It full project name is (still) officially Apache Jakarta POI, although I don't
think we should
exclude Apache POI and Jakarta POI from the list of not allowed TM usage..
IANAL
Mvgr,
Martin
David Fisher wrote:
> Certainly some of the following may be wrong like "Apache Jakarta PMC"
> and there
Avik Sengupta wrote:
>> 2. Add a some trademark usage words (like that on
>> http://tomcat.apache.org/legal.html
>
> I was never a fan or stating the obvious, but that'll probably make me a bad
> lawyer. What's the apache legal team view on stuff like this? Have they
> approved the tomcat page?
> 2. Add a some trademark usage words (like that on
> http://tomcat.apache.org/legal.html
I was never a fan or stating the obvious, but that'll probably make me a bad
lawyer. What's the apache legal team view on stuff like this? Have they
approved the tomcat page? I'm loath to do this without so
Certainly some of the following may be wrong like "Apache Jakarta
PMC" and there is probably no "Powered by POI" logo.
Also, Is "Apache POI" or is "Apache Jakarta POI" or "Jakarta POI"
better? The logo says "Apache POI"
Other than the other trademark list is the following helpful?
Regards,
Hi -
2. Add a some trademark usage words (like that on
http://tomcat.apache.org/legal.html
Yes, please!
I'd like to acknowledge POI properly (along with Apache Tomcat)
Thanks! Thanks again.
Regards,
Dave Fisher
Avik Sengupta wrote:
> Thanks for the effort Mark.
>
> Can I just ask that if you're doing any changes to the build, you run it
> past
> this list, since it'll interest everybody?
Happy to. I am not planning any changes to the build at the moment. If
this changes I'll let the list know. Most o
Thanks for the effort Mark.
Can I just ask that if you're doing any changes to the build, you run it past
this list, since it'll interest everybody?
Thanks
-
Avik
On Monday 15 January 2007 18:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> > I have add you to the jakarta-poi group.. Le
Yegor Kozlov wrote:
> We still have files without the proper ASF header.
I have patches ready to go for all of these and a few others. I've
just seen Martin has enabled my commit access so I should have these
fixed soon - I want to do a few more tests before committing.
The committers repository
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> I have add you to the jakarta-poi group.. Let me know if there are any
> problems..
All is working perfectly. Many thanks.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailing List:http://j
I have add you to the jakarta-poi group.. Let me know if there are any
problems..
Mvgr,
Martin
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>> Oh nm. Didn't see the @apache.org address. Can you please state that
>> you are not bound and have never been bound by an NDA or other such
>> exclusio
We still have files without the proper ASF header.
Run the following command from the trunk directory:
$grep -rL "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation" . | grep .java$
./src/java/org/apache/poi/ddf/EscherBitmapBlip.java
./src/java/org/apache/poi/hpsf/SummaryInformation.java
./src/java/org
No, I didn't find any show stoppers.
Yegor
RK> Yegor Kozlov schrieb:
>> For HSSF we have 84 open issues in the bugzilla.
>>
RK> Are there any show stoppers for a final release?
RK> Best regards
RK> Rainer Klute
RK>Rainer Klute IT-Consulting GmbH
RK> Dipl.-Infor
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Oh nm. Didn't see the @apache.org address. Can you please state that
> you are not bound and have never been bound by an NDA or other such
> exclusionary agreement with Microsoft? If so I remove my objection.
>
> -andy
I am not, and have never been, bound by an NDA or
Oh nm. Didn't see the @apache.org address. Can you please state that
you are not bound and have never been bound by an NDA or other such
exclusionary agreement with Microsoft? If so I remove my objection.
-andy
Mark Thomas wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
-1 for granting karma for a prom
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> -1 for granting karma for a promise to commit. Past experience teaches
> us that patches come first.
Fair enough. I'll create a bugzilla entry once I have some patches
ready to go.
Mark
> Martin van den Bemt wrote:
>> If the current POI committers don't have an objecti
-1 for granting karma for a promise to commit. Past experience teaches
us that patches come first.
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
If the current POI committers don't have an objection, I can add the necessary
karma.
Mvgr,
Martin
Mark Thomas wrote:
Avik Sengupta wrote:
Most important
If the current POI committers don't have an objection, I can add the necessary
karma.
Mvgr,
Martin
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Avik Sengupta wrote:
>> Most important issue was the file headers. Been fixed. Key signing needs to
>> be arranged.
>
> A number if source files have no header at all. I hav
There is one that I'd like to commit that I have uploaded the patch to
bugzilla before a final. It is rather serious (Causes HSSF to barf with
an array index exception). I will commit it once my account gets
straightened out.
Rainer Klute wrote:
Yegor Kozlov schrieb:
For HSSF we have 84
Yegor is often off the net on weekends cross country skiing or running.
That said here is what I know -
DF> I'm seeing you clearing lots of POI bugs - this is good.
There will be much more. By Monday I'm going to close about 30 bugs.
Just need to create a unit test per bug.
I don't know if
Yegor Kozlov schrieb:
> For HSSF we have 84 open issues in the bugzilla.
>
Are there any show stoppers for a final release?
Best regards
Rainer Klute
Rainer Klute IT-Consulting GmbH
Dipl.-Inform.
Rainer Klute E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Körner Grund
Nick,
Thanks.
Regards,
Dave
On Jan 11, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
1. Someone needs to anoint themselves release manager for 3.x.x XXx
I can do this, if no-one else fancies it. (I will need several
people to volunteer to check things)
ACO> can someone please figure out if we have any other REAL issues and list
ACO> them here? Some seemed to be "preference" issues of Jakarta members. I
ACO> do not plan to assist in satiating those. #2 is a serious issue, we
ACO> should be signing releases. I will help with any serious leg
Avik Sengupta wrote:
> Most important issue was the file headers. Been fixed. Key signing needs to
> be arranged.
A number if source files have no header at all. I haven't done an
exhaustive check but the ones I found on my random wander through the
source were:
font_metrics.properties
various p
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
1. Someone needs to anoint themselves release manager for 3.x.x XXx
I can do this, if no-one else fancies it. (I will need several people to
volunteer to check things)
2. Someone needs to get a valid key recognized by Apache.
I have a pgp key t
Most important issue was the file headers. Been fixed. Key signing needs to
be arranged.
Everything else (IMO) was a wishlist and/or general QA issue, not unexpected
in an alpha release.
Regards
-
Avik
On Thursday 11 January 2007 08:58, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Umm...okay so there will be
Umm...okay so there will be a POI release when we release it. The rest
is not part of a topic that I'm interested in discussing anymore.
Build issues that I'm aware of:
1. Someone needs to anoint themselves release manager for 3.x.x XXx
2. Someone needs to get a valid key recognized by Apache
First let's talk about what is necessary to get the build to
generate artifacts that comply.
Yes - is it close now, or not? That is all I meant by "roadmap"
BTW - Didn't I say I didn't want to get into that awful Jakarta
General discussion. (I understand completely your "Ackerly" issue -
h
Roadmaps are lies in a volunteer open source project. Draw your own and
just move it when it isn't met or put resources on the table to get them
met.
First let's talk about what is necessary to get the build to generate
artifacts that comply.
-Andy
David Fisher wrote:
Hi-
OK. There was
Hi-
OK. There was an attempt at a POI 3.alpha3 release last month, and
Jakarta got into a big snit because it wasn't done right, etc. Then
there has been a whole lot of effort to get everything updated to the
current Jakarta standards. (This is the short version and I don't
care about all
29 matches
Mail list logo
