Re: Need opinion on license type

Yes of course, I can use WRKSRC_SUBDIR or similar. I've just improvised to be fast to solve license stuff. I didn't touch port since I adopted it and only 493 version have a license file included in tarball. Thanks for let me know about it or I committed as it was, meh :) Lorenzo Salvadore escre

Re: Need opinion on license type

--- Original Message --- On Friday, June 17th, 2022 at 15:54, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > Ok, I will adjust license terms following your example, commit the port > update and let uptream author know about this, since I'm waiting for his > answer about this same license subject for months :)

Re: Need opinion on license type

Ok, I will adjust license terms following your example, commit the port update and let uptream author know about this, since I'm waiting for his answer about this same license subject for months :) Related to '${WRKSRC}/../..//docs/License.txt' thats because port uses 'WRKSRC=${WRKDIR}/${DISTNAME}

Re: Need opinion on license type

--- Original Message --- On Friday, June 17th, 2022 at 13:47, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hello Lorenzo, > First of all thank you all that help me on this subject. > Ok, I've take a look at math/maxima and I simplified it to: > --- > LICENSE= IOZONECLAUSE > LICENSE_NAME= Iozone clause >

Re: Need opinion on license type

Hello Lorenzo, First of all thank you all that help me on this subject. Ok, I've take a look at math/maxima and I simplified it to: --- LICENSE=IOZONECLAUSE LICENSE_NAME= Iozone clause LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/../..//docs/License.txt LICENSE_PERMS= dist-mirror dist-sell pkg-mirror pkg

Re: Need opinion on license type

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:35 PM Lorenzo Salvadore < phascolarc...@protonmail.ch> wrote: > > IMO at first sight it seems NONE since it don't match Predefined License > > List > > > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#licenses-license-list > > A non predefined License is not NO

Re: Need opinion on license type

> IMO at first sight it seems NONE since it don't match Predefined License > List > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#licenses-license-list A non predefined License is not NONE, it's a license that you have to specify manually, see for example https://docs.freebsd.org/en/boo

Re: Need opinion on license type

On 2022-06-16 17:23, Nuno Teixeira wrote: Hello, Need an opinion on what license type should be choosed for: LICENSE --- Copyright 1991, 1992, 1994, 1998, 1999, 2002 William D. Norcott License to freely use and distribute this software is hereby granted by the author, subject to the condition

Re: Need opinion on license type

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 3:29 AM Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:23:09AM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > >Need an opinion on what license type should be choosed for: > >LICENSE > >--- > >Copyright 1991, 1992, 1994, 1998, 1999, 2002 William D. Norcott > >

Re: Need opinion on license type

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:23:09AM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: >Need an opinion on what license type should be choosed for: >LICENSE >--- >Copyright 1991, 1992, 1994, 1998, 1999, 2002 William D. Norcott >License to freely use and distribute this software is hereby granted >

Need opinion on license type

Hello, Need an opinion on what license type should be choosed for: LICENSE --- Copyright 1991, 1992, 1994, 1998, 1999, 2002 William D. Norcott License to freely use and distribute this software is hereby granted by the author, subject to the condition that this copyright notice remains intact.