On 07/20/18 21:00, Brian Callahan wrote:
On 07/13/18 22:37, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi ports --
Recently, I needed a Pascal compiler for arm. I am not smart enough
to port Free Pascal to arm, though it seems like such a task is
possible.
Instead, I made a port of the old GNU Pascal compile
On 07/21/18 11:04, Brian Callahan wrote:
On 7/21/2018 9:58 AM, Solene Rapenne wrote:
Brian Callahan writes:
On 07/10/18 10:57, Brian Callahan wrote:
On 07/10/18 05:14, Tom Murphy wrote:
The game went Freeware in 1999 and its files are free to
download. There's nothing to purchase.
OpenOMF
On 07/28/18 17:24, Frederic Cambus wrote:
Hi ports@,
Lynx 2.8.9 stable has finally been released, so here is a diff to
update to this version. Unless I'm mistaken, bumping EPOCH is required
here so users are updated from lynx-2.8.9pl19 to lynx-2.8.9.
Why not just make it lynx-2.8.9pl20? Does
On 07/22/18 15:57, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 03:07:36PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
...
Looking for testers. My main machine died yesterday and the laptop I have
left doesn't have hardware rendering or audio.
Works fine on my system with sound, running the GOG.com v
On 07/28/18 08:35, Solene Rapenne wrote:
Brian Callahan wrote:
On 07/21/18 11:04, Brian Callahan wrote:
On 7/21/2018 9:51 AM, Solene Rapenne wrote:
Brian Callahan writes:
On 07/07/18 14:28, Brian Callahan wrote:
On 07/07/18 14:06, mitchell wodach wrote:
here is one with subports. I also
Hi ports@,
Lynx 2.8.9 stable has finally been released, so here is a diff to
update to this version. Unless I'm mistaken, bumping EPOCH is required
here so users are updated from lynx-2.8.9pl19 to lynx-2.8.9.
Comments? OK?
Index: Makefile
=
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 04:45:25PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> Anyhow, a new port tarball looks like the attached.
OK kn
Hello,
Here is an update to neovim for version 0.3.1. The new release contains
mostly bugfixes and nothing major. As such, the diff is just a version
bump and everything else remains the same.
OK?
--
Jon
Index: editors/neovim/Makefile
==
A first step is to set all ports that can't now move to 8.6 to 8.5.
This should be possible to do right now and shouldn't change anything, even
packages.
Once that settles, step two is to manually set all
the 8.6-capable ports to 8.6 with changes like
+MODTCL_VERSION=8.6
and a revision bump.
Onc
Hi folks,
I'm working on a package for Subsurface, https://subsurface-divelog.org.
It now compiles fine (some pending stuff upstream for it) and I've been
using it for a while on OpenBSD by way of a modified version of its
baked-in build script.
The question is as follows. I think I can get all
> -- Original Message --
> From: Stuart Cassoff <3...@bell.net>
> Date: July 28, 2018 at 1:15 PM
>
>
> > -- Original Message --
> > From: Rafael Sadowski
> > Date: July 28, 2018 at 12:59 PM
> >
> >
> > Hi All!
> >
> > First try to update graphviz. The tests loo
> -- Original Message --
> From: Rafael Sadowski
> Date: July 28, 2018 at 12:59 PM
>
>
> Hi All!
>
> First try to update graphviz. The tests look ok and runtime test with
> x11/kde-applications/umbrello too.
>
> My main concern DISTNAME. That's not nice, any ideas?
> TK is gone
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> On 2018-06-21 Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > the last few days I prepared an update of ocaml to 4.06 and opam to
> > 2.00rc2 and along with it updates or REVISION bumps of the dependent
> > ports.
>=20
> He
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> On 2018-06-21 Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the last few days I prepared an update of ocaml to 4.06 and opam to
> > 2.00rc2 and along with it updates or REVISION bumps of the dependent
> > ports.
>
> Here c
landry@ provides a buildbot for mozill-firefox but core development is
focused on privilege separation: pledge(2), unveil(2), Chromium/Iridium
are able to utilize privilege separation while mozilla-firefox does not.
This raises questions about a buildbot for Chromium and/or Iridium.
Would it be
Hi,
update of spice-gtk to 0.35 broke SPICE support in virt-viewer because
this spice-gtk version dropped spice-controller and this was still required
by virt-viewer-6.0.
virt-viewer-7.0 requires spice-gtk >= 0.35 and does not check for
spice-controller
anymore, thus SPICE supports works fine.
Brian Callahan wrote:
>
> On 07/21/18 11:04, Brian Callahan wrote:
> >
> > On 7/21/2018 9:51 AM, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> >> Brian Callahan writes:
> >>
> >>> On 07/07/18 14:28, Brian Callahan wrote:
> On 07/07/18 14:06, mitchell wodach wrote:
> > here is one with subports. I also cleaned
Hello Brian,
On 07/28/18 03:29, Brian Callahan wrote:
[...]
I think I forgot to mention this in my first email, but this needs
NO_TEST=Yes too.
Sorry for that; it was in my local Makefile, but I forgot to add it to
the tarball; fixed.
When I run abc -h, it identifies itself as "ABC 1.01" -- s
Hey ports,
I seem to have tripped over a bug where collectd segfaults on 6.3/octeon
whenever I have write_graphite set in the config. If I change to using
the network plugin to relay metrics to a 6.3/amd64 machine running a
collectd relay (with write_graphite), the failures go away. (Since I
hav
19 matches
Mail list logo