Re: lang/ocaml and IBT WAS: amd64: IBT bulk build breakage

On 11 Aug 2023, at 12:51, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > yes, for amd64 it's intel Tiger Lake (11th gen) and newer, models of the > format iX-11XXX, iX-12XXX, iX-13XXX. no AMD CPUs. On ark.intel.com, look > for "Control-Flow Enforcement Technology" (the intel term which covers > both shadow stacks a

Re: lang/ocaml and IBT WAS: amd64: IBT bulk build breakage

On 8 Aug 2023, at 20:49, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > Cc: Maintainer > > On 7/31/23 14:28, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >> I managed to run a full bulk build on my T14 G3 with IBT. Kudos >> to Lenovo for engineering a laptop that can build for days on end >> without melting down. >> The following

Re: [UPDATE] lang/ocaml 4.14.0

On 20 Sep 2022, at 19:34, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > I know we're slowing down for the 7.2 release, but I wanted to put this out > there anyway. > > Here's an update for ocaml 4.14.0 ... my initial drama with M4 aside, this > seems to work on amd64, and rebuilds Thanks Volker! What was the i

Re: current status of OCaml

On 5 Sep 2022, at 14:18, Daniel Dickman wrote: > >> the lack of native code i386 in OCaml 5.0 > > Hi Anil, I haven’t followed the ocaml lists but what is the reason to drop > this out of curiosity? It's a large burden to maintain i386 these days. See https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/10540

Re: current status of OCaml

On 5 Sep 2022, at 11:58, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2022/09/05 09:44, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> Daniel will be have to deal with the lack of native code i386 in OCaml 5.0 >> in all likelihood though > > Honestly, a bytecode-only arch on something that anyone

Re: current status of OCaml

On 4 Sep 2022, at 19:15, Daniel Dickman wrote: > >> On Sep 3, 2022, at 11:34 AM, Volker Schlecht >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> just wanted to get a quick idea about the state of affairs with OCaml in >> ports: there's been a lot happening in the OCaml world and not so much in >> the related po

Re: update ocaml to 4.12.1

On 17 Dec 2021, at 17:48, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > > >> On Dec 17, 2021, at 12:21 PM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas >> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Dec 04 2021, Daniel Dickman wrote: >>> See below for a diff for ocaml to the 4.12.x series. Only a few changes >>> were needed for this update and they'r

Re: update ocaml to 4.12.1

great! I’m very happy that you’re still able to work on > the ocaml world on OpenBSD! > > Let me do the commit to 4.12 for now and leave 4.13 and further to you. > > On dune, getting it from 2.7.0 to latest would also be awesome. > > Thanks! > >> On Dec 6, 2021, a

Re: update ocaml to 4.12.1

N = 0 > +VERSION= 4.12.1 > > PKGNAME = ocaml-${VERSION:C/\+//} > > @@ -20,7 +19,6 @@ DISTFILES= ${DISTNAME}.tar.gz ${DOCFILES > DISTNAME =ocaml-${VERSION} > > HOMEPAGE= https://ocaml.org/ > -MAINTAINER= Anil Madhavapeddy > > # Q

Re: mldonkey: use custom build of OCaml 3.12

On 17 Jun 2019, at 20:35, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2019/06/17 21:20, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Mldonkey in difficult to adapt to the new 4.08.0 release of OCaml. >> Its build system has the option to build against a private build of >> OCaml 3.12 and a copy of lablgtk. >>

Re: mldonkey: use custom build of OCaml 3.12

I think this approach is fine for this particular package, since upstream lags in recent times. The opam package for mldonkey is on ocaml<4.06, but I'm CCing the current maintainer Ygrek in case there is a 4.08 port in the offing. cheers, Anil > On 17 Jun 2019, at 20:20, Christopher Zimmermann

Re: More OCaml ports for /dev/null?

On 2 Apr 2019, at 18:26, Cyril Roelandt wrote: > > (I'm the author of upt. Please keep me CCed) > > On 2019-04-02 12:58, Daniel Jakots wrote: >> You can look at sysutils/upt. It's not something specific for OpenBSD. >> It works with "frontends" (language-specific packages systems, cpan pip >> et

Re: More OCaml ports for /dev/null?

> On 2 Apr 2019, at 13:12, Ian Darwin wrote: > >> Adding support to portgen would be ideal .. > > Exactly what I was going to say, but Stuart beat me to it. This would be > ideal for OpenBSD; > hopefully not too non-ideal for upstream. > >> Adding something to directly build a package from

Re: More OCaml ports for /dev/null?

On 31 Mar 2019, at 04:29, Kenneth Westerback wrote: > > My full table is on cvs as ~krw/ocamlports.org . > > I have > > devel/ocaml-uutf > lang/ocaml-camlp5 > math/ocaml-num > math/ocaml-zarith > devel/dune > > as candidates for removal since they don't appear to be use

Re: ocaml fallout (i386): lang/obc

I think this is safe to remove... > On 26 Mar 2019, at 18:25, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi, > > please excuse me for replying so late. > This issue is very probably easy to work around. > But still I'm wondering whether this is used by anyone. > We still ship version 2.9, which only sup

Re: sysutils/opam: use -full source tree including all dependencies.

And ok avsm@. > On 11 Mar 2019, at 22:01, kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote: > > This is ok krw@. > > Ken > >> On Mar 11, 2019, at 5:29 PM, Christopher Zimmermann >> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:08:45 -0400 >> Kenneth R Westerback wrote: >> >>> I like this, but I am slightly confused

Re: UPDATE of lang/ocaml to 4.07 and dependent ports

> > The ocaml depends column I got from the results of 'opam show > ". I am not sure how seriously to take the info since several say > they won't work with 4.07.1 and yet they do. :-). Which ones? I can fix those upstream. Looks like just cil and camlp5 are restricted to <4.07 in your list abov

Re: UPDATE of lang/ocaml to 4.07 and dependent ports

> On 13 Feb 2019, at 09:07, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 21 2018, Christopher Zimmermann > wrote: >> On 2018-06-21 Christopher Zimmermann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> the last few days I prepared an update of ocaml to 4.06 and opam to >>> 2.00rc2 and

Re: p5-Net-FTPServer update to 1.125, fix with perl 5.28

> On 9 Feb 2019, at 17:00, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > The in-tree version of p5-Net-FTPServer fails at build time with > the pending Perl update. > > Diff below: > > - updates to 1.125 which fixes the build issue > - removes the old patches which are no longer needed > - adds new patch to f

Re: Nuke some Ocaml ports

On 27 Feb 2017, at 20:58, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > > >> On Feb 27, 2017, at 3:23 PM, Christopher Zimmermann >> wrote: >> >>> On 2017-02-27 Kenneth R Westerback wrote: >>> >>> Anyway, I'm happy to do the dirty work of nuking any or all of these >>> ports and then continuing the process of

Re: Update ocaml-cmdliner to 0.9.8

ok avsm, but doesn't this require bumping the REVISIONs of everything that depends on cmdliner as well? Anil > On 5 Jul 2016, at 14:29, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > Trivial (?) update to latest ocaml-cmdliner, an opam dependency. > > This brings cmdliner up to the version that opam itself

Re: [opam-devel] openbsd ocaml 4.02.3 + opam 1.2.2 upgrade

On 25 Aug 2015, at 18:15, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > > > ok jca@ > Thanks! All committed now. > > - regarding bison, "it's complicated" I'm just trying to figure out if it's worth the hassle of removing the minor bison feature used in the aspcud porting chain, or wait for a bison upd

Re: [opam-devel] openbsd ocaml 4.02.3 + opam 1.2.2 upgrade

On 17 Aug 2015, at 12:37, Kenneth Westerback wrote: > > Firing up -4 on my i386 test box while you wait for the ports@ ok. :-) > > What was the issue with ocaml-camlimage? It was missing an explicit dependency on lablgtk, and so it got skipped from the configure script when rebuilt on a clean p

Re: [opam-devel] openbsd ocaml 4.02.3 + opam 1.2.2 upgrade

On 16 Aug 2015, at 09:18, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > On Sun, > > I built coccinelle on armv7 with the -2 version of the patch without > problem. It appears this is not native as > infrastructure/mk/arch-defines.mk has: > OCAML_NATIVE_ARCHS = i386 sparc amd64 > OCAML_NATIVE_DYNLINK_ARCHS = i386 a

Re: [opam-devel] openbsd ocaml 4.02.3 + opam 1.2.2 upgrade

On 14 Aug 2015, at 15:40, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > > On 3 Aug 2015, at 18:58, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> >> This rather large ports diff does an update of the OCaml ports to 4.02.3: >> http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3.patch.txt >> >&

Re: openbsd ocaml 4.02.3 + opam 1.2.2 upgrade

On 3 Aug 2015, at 18:58, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > > This rather large ports diff does an update of the OCaml ports to 4.02.3: > http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3.patch.txt > > It bumps the REVISION of most of the untouched OCaml ports since binary

Re: openbsd ocaml 4.02.3 + opam 1.2.2 upgrade

On 3 Aug 2015, at 18:58, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > > This rather large ports diff does an update of the OCaml ports to 4.02.3: > http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3.patch.txt > > It bumps the REVISION of most of the untouched OCaml ports since binary

openbsd ocaml 4.02.3 + opam 1.2.2 upgrade

This rather large ports diff does an update of the OCaml ports to 4.02.3: http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3.patch.txt It bumps the REVISION of most of the untouched OCaml ports since binary compat is not preserved across OCaml revisions. Any tests on non-x86 would be appre

Re: UPDATE several OCaml ports: hevea, wyrd, utop...

I've eyeballed all these (but not done a build) and they look ok to me with these comments - findlib: need a @bin on safe_camlp4? - dose3: the version here should precisely match whatever the OPAM port needs. OPAM 1.2.1 is now out as well, so if that's added then this dose version should be ok

Re: install documentation for ocaml-calendar

On 21 Oct 2014, at 19:18, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > --- patches/patch-Makefile_in 18 Aug 2012 22:06:49 - > 1.2 +++ patches/patch-Makefile_in 21 Oct 2014 18:17:05 - > @@ -1,7 +1,22 @@ > $OpenBSD: patch-Makefile_in,v 1.2 2012/08/18 22:06:49 avsm Exp $ > Makefile.in.orig Fri A

Re: [UPDATE] devel/utop

On 21 Oct 2014, at 19:21, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:04:05 +0100 Anil Madhavapeddy > wrote: > >> I think this needs a corresponding lambda-term 1.7 update (that now >> makes camlp4 optional -- not sure if necessary or not). > > > Wel

Re: [UPDATE] lang/ocaml

ok me, but it needs to go in with the ocaml-camlp4 port as they are paired. This also needs revision bumps across the board for ocaml ports, right? -anil On 21 Oct 2014, at 17:56, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > like my last proposal, but also update to 4.02.1. The NO_TEST > --enable-

Re: [UPDATE] lang/ocaml-camlp4

There is a newer upstream release available, which is camlp4-4.02.1+1 (a bugfix release over the 4.02.1 release). We should bump to that instead, but it should be a trivial upgrade against your patch below. -anil On 21 Oct 2014, at 18:00, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > straightforw

Re: [UPDATE] devel/utop

I think this needs a corresponding lambda-term 1.7 update (that now makes camlp4 optional -- not sure if necessary or not). On 21 Oct 2014, at 18:25, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > straightforward update of devel/utop. OK? > > > Christopher > > > Index: Makefile >

Re: [NEW] OCaml oasis and Janestreet Core and Async

On 10 Oct 2014, at 11:48, Kenneth Westerback wrote: > On 10 October 2014 14:46, Kenneth Westerback wrote: >> On 10 October 2014 13:03, Christopher Zimmermann >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> attached you find many new OCaml ports. Mainly the following two and >>> their dependencies: >>> >>> * Oasis

Re: [FIX] lang/ocaml

On 10 Oct 2014, at 09:59, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > here are some fixes and a new CONFIGURE_STYLE for lang/ocaml. > > * add an oasis_setup CONFIGURE_STYLE, see the port-modules doc below. > > * Set CONFIGURE_ARGS += --enable-tests depending on NO_TEST in oasis > CONFIGURE_STYLE

Re: [UPDATE] lang/ocaml 4.02

On 3 Sep 2014, at 13:44, Kenneth Westerback wrote: > > "opam install ssl" followed by "opam install async_graphics" worked. > And looking at 'opam list' on my other, as-yet-un-upgraded, box I see > that ssl was present there. Great -- this will be fixed by the external solver being ported. The

Re: [UPDATE] devel/ounit 2.0.0

On 3 Sep 2014, at 09:33, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > +share/examples/Makefile > +share/examples/example.ml > +share/examples/test_list.ml > +share/examples/test_list2.ml > +share/examples/test_stack.ml > +share/examples/test_suite.ml The examples need to be installed to a subdirectory, other

Re: [UPDATE] lang/ocaml 4.02

On 3 Sep 2014, at 09:32, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:14:00 +0200 Anil Madhavapeddy > wrote: > >> On 3 Sep 2014, at 06:53, Kenneth Westerback wrote: >>> >>> Got OCaml and OCaml-camlp4 built and installed. Some confusion about >>

Re: [UPDATE] lang/ocaml 4.02

On 3 Sep 2014, at 06:53, Kenneth Westerback wrote: > > Got OCaml and OCaml-camlp4 built and installed. Some confusion about > 'pkg_add -u' not working for OCaml or opam so I deleted the packages > and re-installed. Also installed OCaml-graphics since it was there so > I assumed it was necessary e

Re: [NEW] lang/ocaml-camlp4

This shouldn't need findlib in the build depends any more since it's installed directly. -anil > On 2 Sep 2014, at 06:50, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 23:34:18 -0400 Kenneth Westerback > wrote: > >>> On 1 September 2014 07:12, Christopher Zimmermann >>> wrote: >>> H

Re: [UPDATE] lang/ocaml 4.02

On 1 Sep 2014, at 14:35, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 14:21:56 +0200 Anil Madhavapeddy > wrote: > >> This is a huge update, thanks Christopher! Do you also want to take >> joint MAINTAINER on OCaml? Main reason this should go in is that >>

Re: [UPDATE] lang/ocaml 4.02

still work, or repair them. > # Don't forget to bump version in ocaml.port.mk, too! > -VERSION=4.01.0 > -REVISION = 0 > +VERSION=4.02.0 > > PKGNAME-main =ocaml-${VERSION} > PKGNAME-graphics =ocaml-graphics-${VERSION} > -PKGNAME-camlp4 = ocam

Re: [NEW] lang/ocaml-camlp4

This needs to wait until we tag a non RC version of camlp4. Jeremie: since we decided against installing camlp4 via findlib, can the 4.02.0+rc1-no-findlib tag be turned into 4.02.0 release? I don't think there are any source changes involved, so the below should work once the tag is created. -an

Re: add OCaml camlp4 as build depends where needed

On 27 Aug 2014, at 12:24, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:08:40 +0200 Christopher Zimmermann > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> those are the packages build_depending on camlp4 I found so far. >> This shouldn't need a REVISION bump since those ports already depend on >> lang/ocaml,

Re: UPDATE: devel/ocaml-camomile to 0.8.5

Is cppo difficult to port? Minimising diffs here is preferable as cppo has some features that cpp doesn't (and can be easy to miss). > On 25 Aug 2014, at 16:32, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi, > > here comes an update to Camomile 0.8.5. > The Camomile build system relies on the cppo OCam

Re: UPDATE: devel/ocaml-batteries

Ok avsm, except consider bumping the version number with a suffix to indicate it's not vanilla 2.2.0 due to the backported patches (which are significant). > On 25 Aug 2014, at 20:22, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi, > > this is a straightforward update for batteries included. > Patches f

Re: UPDATE: sysutils/findlib

; -REVISION=2 > +DISTNAME=findlib-1.5.2 > MASTER_SITES= http://download.camlcity.org/download/ > > MAINTAINER= Anil Madhavapeddy > @@ -12,11 +11,11 @@ > # MIT/X11 > PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= Yes > > -WANTLIB =c m > -MODULES+=lang/ocaml x11/tk > -BU

Re: [UPDATE] ocaml-4.01.0

On 15 Nov 2013, at 06:42, David Coppa wrote: > > netcamlbox and netmulticore are not being built anymore because we > lack POSIX named semaphores (sem_open(), sem_close(), etc). > > Is it right to put netsys_c_outofheap.o into PFRAG.native instead > of PLIST? Hrm, I believe that's a C binding,

Re: new: opam-1.0.0

On 17 Mar 2013, at 22:34, James Turner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:49:57PM -0400, James Turner wrote: >> Attached is a new port for opam an OCaml source-based package manager. >> Tested on amd64 and loongson. On amd64 the binaries produced are native >> code while on loongson they are OCa

Re: [update] lablgtk2-2.16.0

On 8 Oct 2012, at 08:08, David Coppa wrote: > This is the old META file. > > patches/patch-META is gone: > > --- patches/patch-META 22 May 2012 13:56:33 - 1.3 > +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 - > oops, diffsofdiffs...sorry! -anil

Re: [update] lablgtk2-2.16.0

On 19 Sep 2012, at 01:52, David Coppa wrote: > -SHA1 (lablgtk-2.14.2.tar.gz) = /RhEGMy8VCgldIymP7p1E40upWE= > -SHA256 (lablgtk-2.14.2.tar.gz) = SYGr7avcRiMD80UQQELIivInzNUP0wqb9I/TU6sC0Lo= > -SIZE (lablgtk-2.14.2.tar.gz) = 779803 > +SHA256 (lablgtk-2.16.0.tar.gz) = oOqXUuslfa3PwpFECP/zOdTDQ1eALwL

Re: renaming ports and upgrades

On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:27:52PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/08/18 16:42, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > > Are there any special considerations for renaming a port (e.g. > > security/cryptokit -> security/ocaml-cryptokit) in terms of binary upgrades > > betwee

renaming ports and upgrades

Are there any special considerations for renaming a port (e.g. security/cryptokit -> security/ocaml-cryptokit) in terms of binary upgrades between releases? It would seem that as long as all the dependent ports also have the new name, there shouldn't be, but I thought I'd check... -anil

Re: [new] devel/camlp5 --> needed for BROKEN math/coq

On 15 Aug 2012, at 12:40, Yozo TODA wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > >> math/coq also can work with camlp4. I have a working port of it at >> https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/math/coq > > good news! > I'll try Chris port later. > anyway, I expect m

Re: OCaml 4.00 updates

I sent you a bunch of updates on breakage by mail, and also some patches here; https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/pull/17 There is still some breakage on non-native (e.g. math/facile), but it's getting closer to be ready for cvs. -anil On 12 Aug 2012, at 22:27, Christopher Zimmermann wrote

Re: Add PROPERTIES for ocaml native and native dynlink archs

Can you call this ocaml_native_dynlink instead, to match the upstream term? I'm just doing a bunch of testing of OCaml-4.00.0 with all the in-tree ports, so this is a good time to sort this out too. -anil On 26 Jul 2012, at 04:00, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > ocaml can compile to n

Re: dovecot-antispam

simple if you have a working SpamAssassin setup -anil On 27 Dec 2011, at 07:33, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > I've attached a port of the Dovecot antispam plugin. Any comments/tests > are welcome --- I've been using it for a month and it works great. &g

dovecot-antispan

I've attached a port of the Dovecot antispam plugin. Any comments/tests are welcome --- I've been using it for a month and it works great. -- Anil Madhavapeddy http://anil.recoil.org dovecot-antispam.tar.gz Description: application/tar-gz

add .tbz to EXTRACT_SUFX

I've got a few new OCaml ports that use .tbz as their distribution suffix. Is the below patch ok to put in, to invoke bunzip2 on them? Index: mk/bsd.port.mk === RCS file: /cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk,v retrieving revision

Re: [update] ocaml-3.12.1

I've got a similar diff, but after the lock. There are a bunch of other version updates and new OCaml ports to go in as well (most usefully, ocaml-lwt) -anil On 3 Aug 2011, at 09:24, Richard Bonichon wrote: > Hi folks, > > The attached diff (or the archive) contains the update from ocaml > 3.1

Re: Updating ocaml to 3.12.0

> > I'd like to hear some words from Anil about what archs support > native dynamic linking, besides i386 and amd64 (powerpc? alpha? > sparc?) > x86 and x86_64 platforms only for the moment; see http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5049 for more information. -anil

Re: [UPDATE] Bump ocaml to 3.12

On 4 Nov 2010, at 15:08, Richard Bonichon wrote: >> I did the lang/ocaml update in my tree and started checking the >> dependent ports, but gave up due to not having enough time for a >> daunting task like this... > I hear you, David. But in my ocaml experience, only a handful of > programs will b

Re: python 2.5: time to go?

On 17 Jun 2010, at 04:32, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > 2.4 is in particularly for Zope and we have some messy stuff to > provide the few libraries that this requires. (see py-ldap). > > If we move system Python to 2.6 and keep 2.5 in, 2.5 will only be > useful for software which does not depend on

Re: ocaml update (Was Re: Fwd: [Lablgtk] LablGtk 2.14.1)

The usual plaintive "can anyone test this on sparc64 please?" :-) Although I've just unpacked my sparc64 after moving house, the wires are in the wrong city... -anil On 3 Jun 2010, at 08:47, David Coppa wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2010, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > >> On 05/20/10 12:29, David Coppa w

Re: tendra

On 9 Apr 2010, at 13:34, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 02:22:26AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: >> time to die? > seems fine to me. > > anil, thierry? yes, this port is past its time. -anil

Re: gtk+1 deprecation

On 26 Mar 2010, at 02:43, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> >> There is a lablgtk2 available based on gtk+2, but if the existing port >> isn't being used, is it worth the time to port the new one? >> >> http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/soft/olabl/lablgtk.html >> > > it's in /usr/ports/x11/lablgtk2;

Re: splitting ocaml package

On 28 Oct 2009, at 15:52, Vincent Gross wrote: Okay, I tested the build on a Sun Ultra 5, everything goes smoothly. Ocaml itself is fully functional (no pun intended), I built and used mldonkey without any problem. new patch with two subpackages, -main and -tk : http://www.screwball-coders.net

Re: x11/lablgtk2: fix "GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated" warning message

Have you sent this one upstream? -anil On 21 Oct 2009, at 15:28, David Coppa wrote: Hello, This diff for lablgtk2 fixes the GtkSpinButton "adjustment with non-zero page size" deprecation message, which is very annoying. ciao, david Index: Makefile =

Re: splitting ocaml package

On 20 Oct 2009, at 02:20, Popov, Alex wrote: I finaly got my sparc64 box up and and running and tried building OCaml from 4.6-current. It fails on with the following error: gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/obj/ports/ocaml-3.11.1p0/ocaml-3.11.1/otherlibs/num' gmake[2]: Entering directory `/u

Re: Best way to compile specific php5-extensions. Flavors or Subpackages?

On 26 Aug 2009, at 04:36, David Taveras wrote: a.) Iam confused with subpackages and flavors. Which method should apply to accomplish what I want? If its the flavors then.. Iam expected to feed it the packages I dont want ? Like: env FLAVOR="-dba -dbase -imap -ldap -mhash -ncurses -odbc -

Re: Update: postgresql 8.4.0

On 21 Jul 2009, at 20:47, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: The new PostgreSQL is in. As said in the commit log, it's a major upgrade ! Dump/restore is REQUIRED for this upgrade !!! Thanks to all who tested this upgrade. Most users wont read the commit log, but do will a binary package upgrade wh

Re: testing: ocaml-3.11.1RC1

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:17:08PM -0700, Alex Popov wrote: > On 5/19/2009 12:07, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> Here is an early diff for anyone who wants to try out OCaml 3.11.1RC1 >> > Anil, > > I have built and installed ocaml-3.11.1RC1 using your diff, but when I

testing: ocaml-3.11.1RC1

Here is an early diff for anyone who wants to try out OCaml 3.11.1RC1 on OpenBSD-current: http://recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-3.11.1RC1.diff I've pasted the changelog below; it contains an important fix to threading/fork which may affect mldonkey. Good tests would be on PowerPC/

Re: ocaml-3.11.0 update + dependent port fixes

On 16 Feb 2009, at 16:28, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009/02/16 14:52, Richard Bonichon wrote: Hi I've attached an update to OCaml 3.11.0 , which is a significant bump over our existing 3.0.9 version. Works here on i386. Testing soon on amd64 only if nobody else does it. However shouldn'

ocaml-3.11.0 update + dependent port fixes

I've attached an update to OCaml 3.11.0 , which is a significant bump over our existing 3.0.9 version. I've done only light testing on non-i386, and in particular could use access to a sparc64 to test it out (and other ports). Or even better, someone else to take the diffs below and put th

Re: Update of ocaml to 3.10.2

ortunately my Netra decided to explode a few months ago. -anil On 4 Dec 2008, at 14:09, Frank Denis wrote: Hello Anil, How to do an arch-dependant PLIST? Le Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 10:35:54AM +0000, Anil Madhavapeddy ecrivait : The sparc64 port of OCaml doesnt have a native code compil

Re: Update of ocaml to 3.10.2

The sparc64 port of OCaml doesnt have a native code compiler, so the PLISTs are probably wrong in the update. Anything with .opt wont exist there. -anil On 26 Nov 2008, at 00:27, Alex Popov wrote: On 11/25/2008 10:42, Frank Denis wrote: Here's an update of OCaml from version 3.09.3 to

Re: Ocaml and OpenBSD's port system

ut no native code) to check for regression. It's attached against OpenBSD-current and fixes a string termination error in yacc which Ray Lai found as well. Incidentally, you can just do 'make clean && make patch' and skip all the intermediate steps when messing around wi

php5-fastcgi testing

Already mailed the maintainers, but this could probably use slightly wider testing anyway. PHP5 FastCGI port, http://recoil.org/~avsm/fastcgi.tgz $ cd /usr/ports/www/php5/ untar fastcgi.tgz in there $ cd fastcgi $ make install You'll have /usr/local/bin/php-fastcgi to use, I'm using it under

Re: math/coq updating...

When you have both bytecode and native code compilers, You can choose to compile Coq in bytecode only or native code mode. My intention is to provide a chance to select FLAVOR when two ocaml compilers available... I'd strongly prefer it if all possible versions were compiled up. e.g. both byt