2013/11/8 Stuart Cassoff :
> On 10/01/13 14:41, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>> On 10/01/13 12:07, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>>> 2013/10/1 Stuart Cassoff :
On 07/11/13 18:39, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> On 07/11/13 17:21, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>> 2013/7/7 Stuart Cassoff :
>>> Tested by me for all typ
On 10/01/13 14:41, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> On 10/01/13 12:07, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>> 2013/10/1 Stuart Cassoff :
>>> On 07/11/13 18:39, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
On 07/11/13 17:21, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2013/7/7 Stuart Cassoff :
>> Tested by me for all types of substitution.
>> Also, I'
On 10/01/13 12:07, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2013/10/1 Stuart Cassoff :
>> On 07/11/13 18:39, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>>> On 07/11/13 17:21, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
2013/7/7 Stuart Cassoff :
> Tested by me for all types of substitution.
> Also, I've been running with it for a while with no adver
2013/10/1 Stuart Cassoff :
> On 07/11/13 18:39, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>> On 07/11/13 17:21, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>>> 2013/7/7 Stuart Cassoff :
Tested by me for all types of substitution.
Also, I've been running with it for a while with no adverse effects.
I don't know which ports this
On 07/11/13 18:39, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> On 07/11/13 17:21, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>> 2013/7/7 Stuart Cassoff :
>>> Tested by me for all types of substitution.
>>> Also, I've been running with it for a while with no adverse effects.
>>> I don't know which ports this will affect. Can't be too many.
>
On 07/11/13 17:21, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2013/7/7 Stuart Cassoff :
>> Tested by me for all types of substitution.
>> Also, I've been running with it for a while with no adverse effects.
>> I don't know which ports this will affect. Can't be too many.
>> Does your previous patch cover them?
>
> Yes
2013/7/7 Stuart Cassoff :
> Tested by me for all types of substitution.
> Also, I've been running with it for a while with no adverse effects.
> I don't know which ports this will affect. Can't be too many.
> Does your previous patch cover them?
Yes, it is; it contains all necessary bumps there.
On 05/26/13 06:25, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2013/5/25 Stuart Cassoff
>
>> On 05/06/13 15:10, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>>> This patch cleans up path adjustments in Tcl/Tk ports. List of changes:
>>
>> Thanks for taking time to work on this.
>>
>>
>>> * MODTCL_WISH_ADJ is renamed to MODTK_WISH_ADJ and mo
Tested by me for all types of substitution.
Also, I've been running with it for a while with no adverse effects.
I don't know which ports this will affect. Can't be too many.
Does your previous patch cover them?
Stu
On 07/07/13 14:48, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 15.06.2013 9:03 пользователь "Stuart Ca
15.06.2013 9:03 пользователь "Stuart Cassoff" написал:
>
> After some discussion with Vadim Zhukov (takes 3 and 4)
> and reviewing everything everyone else said.
Sorry for the late answer, missed this letter in my backlog.
Looks fine to me. If this version is tested, and with adding bumps to por
After some discussion with Vadim Zhukov (takes 3 and 4)
and reviewing everything everyone else said.
Stu
Index: tcl.port.mk
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/tcl/tcl.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.14 tcl.port.mk
On 05/27/13 14:34, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> So here is a second try, after input from stu@. Differences from
> previous version:
>
> * More compact and correct whitespace handling (with some ideas from
> stu@'s diff);
>
> * Rewrite both tclsh and wish lines in both macros;
>
> * Use MODTC
So here is a second try, after input from stu@. Differences from
previous version:
* More compact and correct whitespace handling (with some ideas from
stu@'s diff);
* Rewrite both tclsh and wish lines in both macros;
* Use MODTCL_BIN also for rewritting "exec" lines in shell snippets;
2013/5/25 Stuart Cassoff
> On 05/06/13 15:10, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > This patch cleans up path adjustments in Tcl/Tk ports. List of changes:
>
> Thanks for taking time to work on this.
>
>
> > * MODTCL_WISH_ADJ is renamed to MODTK_WISH_ADJ and moved to a more
> > appropriate place - tk.por
On 2013/05/25 16:53, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 02:01:04PM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> > > On 05/06/13 15:10, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > >> * MODTCL_TCLSH_ADJ and MODTCL_WISH_ADJ now use full path for
> > >> replac
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 02:01:04PM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> > On 05/06/13 15:10, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> >> * MODTCL_TCLSH_ADJ and MODTCL_WISH_ADJ now use full path for replacement
> >
> > Others have requested this as well. Ok.
> >
On 2013/05/25 14:01, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> > On 05/06/13 15:10, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> >> * MODTCL_TCLSH_ADJ and MODTCL_WISH_ADJ now use full path for replacement
> >
> > Others have requested this as well. Ok.
> >
> >
> >> instead
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> On 05/06/13 15:10, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>> * MODTCL_TCLSH_ADJ and MODTCL_WISH_ADJ now use full path for replacement
>
> Others have requested this as well. Ok.
>
>
>> instead of "#!/usr/bin/env ..." trick;
>
> It's not a trick, it's a p
On 05/25/13 05:40, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> On 05/25/13 05:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2013/05/25 03:47, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
instead of "#!/usr/bin/env ..." trick;
>>>
>>> It's not a trick, it's a perfectly cromulent way to start a script
>>> and some people write their scripts like
On 05/25/13 05:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/05/25 03:47, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>>> instead of "#!/usr/bin/env ..." trick;
>>
>> It's not a trick, it's a perfectly cromulent way to start a script
>> and some people write their scripts like that.
>
> Using the full path protects against
On 2013/05/25 03:47, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> > instead of "#!/usr/bin/env ..." trick;
>
> It's not a trick, it's a perfectly cromulent way to start a script
> and some people write their scripts like that.
Using the full path protects against certain cases of blundering
numbskullery where PAT
On 05/06/13 15:10, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> This patch cleans up path adjustments in Tcl/Tk ports. List of changes:
Thanks for taking time to work on this.
> * MODTCL_WISH_ADJ is renamed to MODTK_WISH_ADJ and moved to a more
> appropriate place - tk.port.mk;
This has come up before.
I like t
On 05/14/13 12:12, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>
> Thanks for taking the time for this.
> Looking at it today; estimated time for my reply is 6 hrs from now.
> I'm not sure I agree with all the changes, but we'll see soon enough.
>
Apologies.
I should never estimate.
rsn,
Stu
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 16:48 CEST, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2013/5/6 Vadim Zhukov
>
> > This patch cleans up path adjustments in Tcl/Tk ports. List of changes:
> >
> > * MODTCL_WISH_ADJ is renamed to MODTK_WISH_ADJ and moved to a more
> > appropriate place - tk.port.mk;
> > * MODTCL_
On 05/14/13 10:48, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2013/5/6 Vadim Zhukov
>
>> This patch cleans up path adjustments in Tcl/Tk ports. List of changes:
>>
>> * MODTCL_WISH_ADJ is renamed to MODTK_WISH_ADJ and moved to a more
>> appropriate place - tk.port.mk;
>> * MODTCL_TCLSH_ADJ and MODTCL_WISH_ADJ
2013/5/6 Vadim Zhukov
> This patch cleans up path adjustments in Tcl/Tk ports. List of changes:
>
> * MODTCL_WISH_ADJ is renamed to MODTK_WISH_ADJ and moved to a more
> appropriate place - tk.port.mk;
> * MODTCL_TCLSH_ADJ and MODTCL_WISH_ADJ now use full path for replacement
> instead
This patch cleans up path adjustments in Tcl/Tk ports. List of changes:
* MODTCL_WISH_ADJ is renamed to MODTK_WISH_ADJ and moved to a more
appropriate place - tk.port.mk;
* MODTCL_TCLSH_ADJ and MODTCL_WISH_ADJ now use full path for replacement
instead of "#!/usr/bin/env ..." trick;
*
27 matches
Mail list logo
