So, is junit4 going to be a separate port or what's going on?
I was the one holding out for junit3 and 4 ports, but on thinking
about it, anybody that's truly dependant on 3.8 will likely have it
and the other jars that depend on 3.8 cached in their project source/lib
directory
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:51:47PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
Hi Kili@ !
can you please test with this diff?
https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/commit/371f4c352abd96a2aef99bcf5beffbb9575cf91d
I can add the latest junit 4.9 and update postgresql-jdbc geo/jeoip
to github if
I'ld like to move the java ports to a non-version jar install. If they
install
multiple jars, put them into ${MOJAVA_JAR_DIR}/project_name/ (without
version). That way you prevent needing to touch other ports just because
you
updated one.
I was planning to do it today.
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:24:38AM -0400, Ian Darwin wrote:
I'ld like to move the java ports to a non-version jar install. If they
install
multiple jars, put them into ${MOJAVA_JAR_DIR}/project_name/ (without
version). That way you prevent needing to touch other ports just
Your and kurt@ design of MODJAVA et al. is simply superb. It allows
much flexibility in choosing versions.
I agree with that sentiment.
Thanks :)
So, is junit4 going to be a separate port or what's going on?
I was the one holding out for junit3 and 4 ports, but on thinking
about it,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:45:22PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
See diff to postgresql-jdbc below
and now with updated pkg/PLIST_docs
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/postgresql-jdbc/Makefile,v
retrieving
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 07:29:31PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
I was the one holding out for junit3 and 4 ports, but on thinking
about it, anybody that's truly dependant on 3.8 will likely have it
and the other jars that depend on 3.8 cached in their project source/lib
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 10:09:27PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 07:29:31PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
I was the one holding out for junit3 and 4 ports, but on thinking
about it, anybody that's truly dependant on 3.8 will likely have it
and the other
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 06:10:41PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 04:25:10PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
I was planning on working on the newest pgsql-jdbc (which is a dev
version) since
Hi Kili@ !
can you please test with this diff?
https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/commit/371f4c352abd96a2aef99bcf5beffbb9575cf91d
I can add the latest junit 4.9 and update postgresql-jdbc geo/jeoip
to github if somebody is willing to test them out.
thanks
I hadn't noticed you were
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 04:25:10PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
I was planning on working on the newest pgsql-jdbc (which is a dev
version) since it works with jdk1.7.
Doesn't postgresql-jdbc 9.0 Build 801 work
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:40:55PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
kili@,
I was planning on working on the newest pgsql-jdbc (which is a dev
version) since it works with jdk1.7.
Doesn't postgresql-jdbc 9.0 Build 801 work with jdk1.7? I'm not a big
fan of updating the port to a version that's still
kili@,
I was planning on working on the newest pgsql-jdbc (which is a dev
version) since it works with jdk1.7.
Doesn't postgresql-jdbc 9.0 Build 801 work with jdk1.7? I'm not a big
fan of updating the port to a version that's still under development.
From
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 04:25:10PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
I was planning on working on the newest pgsql-jdbc (which is a dev
version) since it works with jdk1.7.
Doesn't postgresql-jdbc 9.0 Build 801 work with jdk1.7? I'm not a big
fan of updating the port to a version that's still
COMMENT= regression testing utility for use with the Java language
-VERSION= 3.8.2
+VERSION= 4.8.2
You cannot eliminate JUnit 3.8 because there are still things that
use it that don't work on 4, at least last time I checked.
COMMENT= regression testing utility for use with the Java language
-VERSION= 3.8.2
+VERSION= 4.8.2
You cannot eliminate JUnit 3.8 because there are still things that
use it that don't work on 4, at least last time I checked.
Can you elaborate what things? I will report if
On 07/13/11 16:09, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
COMMENT= regression testing utility for use with the Java language
-VERSION= 3.8.2
+VERSION= 4.8.2
You cannot eliminate JUnit 3.8 because there are still things that
use it that don't work on 4, at least last time I checked.
Can you
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:33:17PM +0100, Nigel Taylor wrote:
You cannot eliminate JUnit 3.8 because there are still things that
use it that don't work on 4, at least last time I checked.
Can you elaborate what things? I will report if they still don't work,
or if they work now.
There
COMMENT= regression testing utility for use with the Java language
-VERSION= 3.8.2
+VERSION= 4.8.2
You cannot eliminate JUnit 3.8 because there are still things that
use it that don't work on 4, at least last time I checked.
Can you elaborate what things? I will report if
19 matches
Mail list logo
