Hi
im using smtp to send but filtering all with amavisd. The solution of
content-filter needs to create in main.cf or in master.cf?
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:08 AM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
deconya a écrit :
Hi
Im configuring a server with postfix amavisd and
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Brandon Hilkert:
We send out a pretty volume of emails right now using a combination
of SQL and IIS SMTP. We get rates now of about 5,000/min. We're
looking to not only improve the rates, but incorporate DKIM/Domainkey
Brandon Hilkert:
What's the best way to clearly identify that syslog is the issue?
Look in my reply. There is an example.
Wietse
- Original Message -
From: Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 11:12
* Brandon Hilkert bhilk...@vt.edu:
We send out a pretty volume of emails right now using a combination of
SQL and IIS SMTP. We get rates now of about 5,000/min. We're looking to
not only improve the rates, but incorporate DKIM/Domainkey signing into
the process. The choice has been made to go
On Friday 20 March 2009 02:52:42 Brandon Hilkert wrote:
As I mentioned, we're using the XFS system for the queue, does that provide
any additional benefit, or would ext3 perform the same? Keep in mind, we
will be dealing with 1,000,000 piece mailouts during a session. My findings
were that
Is a simple ext3 partition usually the recommend file system?
- Original Message -
From: Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) rainer.f...@inxmail.de
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
On Friday 20 March 2009 02:52:42 Brandon
* Brandon Hilkert bhilk...@vt.edu:
Is a simple ext3 partition usually the recommend file system?
Yes
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.computerbeschimpfung.de
C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it
On Friday 20 March 2009 12:04:22 Brandon Hilkert wrote:
Is a simple ext3 partition usually the recommend file system?
Please do not top post.
We use ext3 to have simple, repeatable, clear server setups without surprises
or pitfalls. Performance is good enough for our needs, so I never actually
What's the best way to clearly identify that syslog is the issue?
- Original Message -
From: Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:52:42PM
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:28 PM, David A. Gershman
dagershman_...@dagertech.net wrote:
from an external source. I'm trying to see if there is a setting in
master.cf (or other .cf file) which will reject any email from an
external IP (other than my own) *and* is claiming to be from a local
Victor Duchovni:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:58:52PM +0100, mouss wrote:
I would suggest separating relay control from other checks. something like
smtpd_relay_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated
This has been proposed before.
Yeah, Thought of that a little after mailing. Oh well, I guess I need
to keep my efforts in later defenses (spamassassin).
Thanks.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:28 PM, David A. Gershman
dagershman_...@dagertech.net wrote:
from an external source. I'm trying to see if there is a setting in
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
* Brandon Hilkert bhilk...@vt.edu:
We send out a pretty volume of emails right now using a combination of
SQL
Hello,
I'm trying to make additional conditions work on my system :
Suse 11.1 , postfix 2.5.5 and mysql 5.0.67.
Forwarding and delivering mails to V_USERS works fine for me but I need to
make additional condition
so I make new column mailactiv with default '1'.
If the mailactiv is set to '1' mail
- Original Message -
From: Brandon Hilkert bhilk...@vt.edu
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday,
Noel Jones wrote:
Chris Dos wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
It looks like I want to check for RCPT TO:VERP_Address
So I ran this check against the regexp table using postmap:
postmap -q RCPT TO:chris+no-one-home=chrisdos@chrisdos.com
regexp:header_checks.regexp
and it came back with a result
Brandon Hilkert wrote:
I also put the queue directory back on an ext3 partition and the rates
went up by about a factor of two.
Also, by default the syslog messages were already set with
-/var/log/mail.log. I disabled mail logging all together and found no
change in rates.
My disk is
Brandon Hilkert:
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but how do I go about this. I tried:
mkdir /ram
mount -t ramfs none /ram
and when I send a mail, postfix says there's not enough space in the queue.
Should I be doing it a different way?
Postfix requires that the amount of space is
Chris Dos wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
Chris Dos wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
It looks like I want to check for RCPT TO:VERP_Address
So I ran this check against the regexp table using postmap:
postmap -q RCPT TO:chris+no-one-home=chrisdos@chrisdos.com
regexp:header_checks.regexp
and it came back
Noel Jones wrote:
I was was reading the header_checks won't work on bounced mail. I
setup a regexp check_recipient_access map.
This is the regexp file verp_redirect.regexp :
/^RCPT TO:.+\+.+\=...@.+\..+$/ REDIRECTverpbounce
It's still not working. Here is the postconf -n:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 03:59:05PM +0100, Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
query = SELECT email FROM users WHERE email='%s'
AND mailactiv='1'
Is the mailactiv column integer-valued or string-valued?
NOT WORK.
You really should report output from tests with postmap -q. NOT WORK
is
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
To: Brandon Hilkert bhilk...@vt.edu
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
Brandon Hilkert:
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but how do I go about this. I
Chris Dos wrote:
Well, pointing the gun the wrong way is differently something that I don't want
to be doing. But in the case,
I'm confused. I'm having mail-dr send out to another server,
mail.chrisdos.com, on the internet. Mail-DR is
a separate mail server all together on a different
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] rw_loop: leaving rw loop, no progress
Date: Friday 20 March 2009
From: Mark Martinec mark.martinec+ama...@ijs.si
To: amavis-u...@lists.sourceforge.net
Ivan,
This is log in attached files
Thanks, interesting and strange.
I'll
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
To: Brandon Hilkert bhilk...@vt.edu
Cc: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org; postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
Brandon Hilkert:
and when I send a mail,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 01:01:55PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
I've been running everything from scripts, hoping to zero in on the
bottleneck.
How many messages are you sending in parallel in the injector scripts?
SMTP is a high latency half-duplex protocol, and a single injector will
never
- Original Message -
From: Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 01:01:55PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
I've been running everything from
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 01:32:26PM -0400, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
- Original Message - From: Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 01:01:55PM
Noel Jones wrote:
Chris Dos wrote:
Well, pointing the gun the wrong way is differently something that I
don't want to be doing. But in the case,
I'm confused. I'm having mail-dr send out to another server,
mail.chrisdos.com, on the internet. Mail-DR is
a separate mail server all together
Hello,
I need to only allow access to known addresses, and found that setting up
smtpd_recipient_restrictions in main.cf would reject unauthorized recipients. I
have this setting in main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/allowed_users,
reject_unauth_destination
I ran
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:13:21AM -0700, Post Freak wrote:
I need to only allow access to known addresses, and found that setting
up smtpd_recipient_restrictions in main.cf would reject unauthorized
recipients. I have this setting in main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
Hello,
Thank you for the configuration, but I am still able to send email to addresses
not listed in allowed_users. Here is my new config:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_destination,
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/allowed_users, reject
I've restarted postfix, but I can
Chris Dos wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
Okay, since the e-mail never finishes sending because the user is
unknown on the other end and it is rejected
right away, is there another way to do this.
The whole point of this exercise for me is to just intercept a bounce
back and process it internally
--
Chris Dos
Senior Engineer
Cell: 303-520-1821
Chris Dos wrote:
Chris Dos wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
Okay, since the e-mail never finishes sending because the user is
unknown on the other end and it is rejected
right away, is there another way to do this.
The whole point of this
Noel Jones wrote:
Okay, since the e-mail never finishes sending because the user is
unknown on the other end and it is rejected
right away, is there another way to do this.
The whole point of this exercise for me is to just intercept a bounce
back and process it internally instead
of
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:27:27AM -0700, J Sloan wrote:
For what it's worth, we've found ext3 to be far too slow for our needs.
The best setup we've found is reiserfs, mounted with noatime and
notail options -
Lets not start file system wars in this thread. The OP's problem is
largely
For what it's worth, we've found ext3 to be far too slow for our needs.
The best setup we've found is reiserfs, mounted with noatime and
notail options -
Joe
Brandon Hilkert wrote:
- Original Message - From: Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:39:05AM -0700, Post Freak wrote:
Thank you for the configuration, but I am still able to send email to
addresses not listed in allowed_users. Here is my new config:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_unauth_destination,
check_recipient_access
Hello,
Yes, postconf did respond with one line and 3 restrictions. Here are the
results:
[r...@myhost postfix]# postconf smtpd_recipient_restrictions
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_destination,
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/allowed_users, reject
Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:00:25PM -0700, Post Freak wrote:
Hello,
Yes, postconf did respond with one line and 3 restrictions. Here are the
results:
[r...@myhost postfix]# postconf smtpd_recipient_restrictions
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_destination,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Chris Dos wrote:
Chris Dos wrote:
Chris Dos wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
Okay, since the e-mail never finishes sending because the user is
unknown on the other end and it is rejected
right away, is there another way to do this.
The whole point of this exercise for me is to
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:49 AM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
That's possible. please do what I told you. if you did and you still
have a problem, feel free to ask. but it's annoying for us to help fix
problems that are known and for which the solution is as easy as to
follow well
OH sorry for that , heres more information:
Activmail is integer.
I checked the varchar mail column with default 'y' and got :
query = SELECT email FROM users WHERE email='%s'
AND mail='y'
serwersuse111:~ # postmap -q sebastian...@example.pl
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 08:19:42PM +0100, Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
OH sorry for that , heres more information:
Activmail is integer.
Then the correct SQL query syntax is:
activmail=1
NOT
activmail='1'
This is basic SQL, not Postfix.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer:
I'm trying to get my queue to ramfs. I mounted a volume. When I send mail to
it, it tells me there's insufficient storage.
I have set:
message_size_limit = 0
What do I need to do to get it to accept mail?
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 07:09:29PM +, Duane Hill wrote:
Though now I'm getting this error after sending bounce to pipe:
Mar 20 12:41:54 mail-dr postfix/pipe[10163]: warning: unexpected attribute
nrequest from bounce socket
(expecting: flags)
Mar 20 12:41:54
I made the syslog_name = postfix-test change, and pasted the contents below.
The postfr...@gmail.com isn't specified in allowed_users, but postfr...@yahoo
is. Also, where do I remove smtpd_access_maps? I don't see that setting in
main.cf.
/var/log/maillog:
Mar 20 13:43:37 slc-monitor1
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:45:50PM -0700, Post Freak wrote:
I made the syslog_name = postfix-test change, and pasted the contents below.
The postfr...@gmail.com isn't specified in allowed_users, but postfr...@yahoo
is. Also, where do I remove smtpd_access_maps? I don't see that setting in
Thanks for the feedback. I told the client the maximal_backoff_time and
maximal_queue_lifetime settings were way too high, and could cause issues, but
they didn't care.
How I make sure the master.cf doesn't override the recipient restrictions?
Here's everything from the maillog after I send
On Mar 20, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Post Freak postfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. I told the client the maximal_backoff_time
and maximal_queue_lifetime settings were way too high, and could
cause issues, but they didn't care.
How I make sure the master.cf doesn't override the
Brandon Hilkert wrote:
I'm trying to get my queue to ramfs. I mounted a volume. When I send
mail to it, it tells me there's insufficient storage.
Not sure about the error, but in general RAMFS sounds like a bad idea
for a number of reasons including the ability to crash your machine if
it
Hello Sahil,
I'm not as concerned about the locally delivered mail. My main concern is I can
email recipients outside the network even though I have specified the
restriction.
Thank you.
From: Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net
To: Post Freak postfr...@yahoo.com
On Mar 20, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Post Freak postfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello Sahil,
I'm not as concerned about the locally delivered mail. My main
concern is I can email recipients outside the network even though I
have specified the restriction.
I said locally SUBMITTED. Not locally
Sorry, I did not CC postfix-users...
- Forwarded Message
From: Post Freak postfr...@yahoo.com
To: Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 3:50:09 PM
Subject: Re: Issue with smtpd_recipient_restrictions
AH And the light comes on!
Thank you very much for the
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 01:41:22PM -0700, Post Freak wrote:
I'm not as concerned about the locally delivered mail. My main concern
is I can email recipients outside the network even though I have specified
the restriction.
The restriction is an *SMTP server* restriction and cannot possibly
- Original Message -
From: Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com
To: Brandon Hilkert bhilk...@vt.edu
Cc: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: Move queue to RAMFS
Brandon Hilkert wrote:
I'm trying to get my queue to ramfs. I mounted a
I knew it must be something I am missing but the mails are still delivered.
MYSQL cut :
mailactivint(1) 0
mailvarchar(1) n
email2email.cf :
query = SELECT email FROM users WHERE email='%s' AND mailactiv= 1
(checked as well : query = SELECT
hello,
in our postfix setup we use virtual_alias_maps to build some simple
mailing-/distribution lists. now we want to reject every mail to a list
where the sender is not a member of the list.
example:
virtual_alias_maps
li...@domaina.tld us...@domain1.tld us...@domain1.tld us...@domain1.tld
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:17:28PM +0100, Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
I knew it must be something I am missing but the mails are still delivered.
MYSQL cut :
mailactiv int(1) 0
mail varchar(1) n
email2email.cf :
query = SELECT email FROM
Hi
I'm green to Postfix. I have 2 anti-spam servers that I upgraded
MailScanner to the latest version and a completely new install of
MailScanner and postfix etc. All three have the same problems . the
one thing that is common to all servers is the original configs. For
the google-ing and digging
I am (almost ;) ) 100% sure that only mail could be delivered is in ONE
mysql db.
serwersuse111:~ # cat /etc/postfix/main.cf
queue_directory=/var/spool/postfix
command_directory=/usr/sbin
daemon_directory = /usr/lib/postfix
data_directory=/var/lib/postfix
mail_owner=postfix
myhostname =
Hello,
Today i had a mail that stuck in the queue with error:
lost connection with mail.someserver.xxx [xx.xxx.xxx.xxx] while
sending RCPT TO), so i looked at logs.
During the session, their server sent mail:
from= to=mail.someserver.xxx-1237585487-test...@mydomain.com
proto=SMTP
David A. Gershman a écrit :
Yeah, Thought of that a little after mailing. Oh well, I guess I need
to keep my efforts in later defenses (spamassassin).
Thanks.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:28 PM, David A. Gershman
dagershman_...@dagertech.net wrote:
from an external source. I'm trying to
Gregory Machin a écrit :
Hi
I'm green to Postfix. I have 2 anti-spam servers that I upgraded
MailScanner to the latest version and a completely new install of
MailScanner and postfix etc. All three have the same problems . the
one thing that is common to all servers is the original configs.
Brandon Hilkert:
what is best to look out and compare?
When the disk is 100% busy, then it is the bottle neck. Disks can
be 100% busy jumping around doing very little I/O.
As Noel suggested in earlier email, try running smtp-sink which
does no disk I/O at all. If things are still
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
* Brandon Hilkert bhilk...@vt.edu:
I was able to get it to mount to tmpfs and it showed no change in
* Brandon Hilkert bhilk...@vt.edu:
You said ext3 was faster, thus I think your ramfs test was flawed.
I was able to mount it to a tmpfs partition. There was no change in
throughput with my script on a tmpfs vs ext3 drive.
So that would mean my disk is not a contribution factor right?
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
I was able to mount it to a tmpfs partition. There was no change in
throughput with my script on a tmpfs vs ext3 drive.
So that would mean my disk is not a contribution factor right?
I'm just following this thread because of curiosity.
tmpfs? Or,
- Original Message -
From: Duane Hill d.h...@yournetplus.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: Performance tuning
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
I was able to mount it to a tmpfs partition. There was no change in
69 matches
Mail list logo
