On Jul 8, 2009, at 10:00 PM, ram wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 19:10 +0200, Ignacio Garcia wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys. I've been googling around looking for info on this without
much
sucess. Here we are: Some of my customers insist on sending bulk-
email
Hi,
I've got a postfix server with spamassassin running. If one of my
customers is on vacation he can turn on auto reply. For this I created a
script /usr/local/bin/responder.
It always worked but the last days it is stopped. I get the following
error in the maillog:
status=deferred (temporary
Hello,
a user of my mail gateway has got the following messages while have
tried to send a message to
recipie...@recipdomain.tld,recipie...@recipdomain.tld:
- Original Message -
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem mailer-dae...@recipserver.tld
To: sen...@senddomain.tld
Sent: Tuesday, July 07,
On 7/9/2009, Rocco Scappatura (rocco.scappat...@infracom.it) wrote:
# postconf -d | grep tls
? This shows defaults... please use postconf -n output - and no need to
filter it, it won't (shouldn't) be all that long...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Wim Groen:
Hi,
I've got a postfix server with spamassassin running. If one of my
customers is on vacation he can turn on auto reply. For this I created a
script /usr/local/bin/responder.
It always worked but the last days it is stopped. I get the following
error in the maillog:
Rocco Scappatura:
# postconf -d | grep tls
What web page is telling you to use postconf -d for
trouble shooting? It should say postconf -n instead.
Wietse
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Charles Marcus
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:43 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: TLS handshake failed
On 7/9/2009, Rocco Scappatura
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:47 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: TLS handshake failed
Rocco Scappatura:
# postconf -d | grep tls
What web
Hi Wietse,
I don't use AppArmor and i disabled SELinux but it didn't helped.
Kind Regards,
Wim
Wim Groen:
Hi,
I've got a postfix server with spamassassin running. If one of my
customers is on vacation he can turn on auto reply. For this I created
a script /usr/local/bin/responder.
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:17:20AM +0200, Wim Groen wrote:
This is the master.cf:
vacationunix- n n - - pipe
flags=FRq user=vmail argv=/usr/local/bin/responder ${sender}
${recipient}
When I look at the file it looks good:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:11:26AM +0200, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
a user of my mail gateway has got the following messages while have
tried to send a message to
recipie...@recipdomain.tld,recipie...@recipdomain.tld:
- Original Message -
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
Thanks Victor,
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 2:11 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: TLS handshake failed
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:11:26AM
Hello,
i try to set up safe etrn.
i use in main.cf
smtpd_etrn_restrictions = check_etrn_access hash:/etc/postfix/etrn-domains
reject
if etrn-domain is found /etc/postfix/etrn-domains returns name of 2nd
restriction which checks by check_client_access other file for clientip and
returns ok if
Looking for some clarification to help me understand. Are
smtpd_*_restrictions processed in this order:
smtpd_client_restrictions
smtpd_helo_restrictions
smtpd_sender_restrictions
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
smtpd_data_restrictions
If these restriction mechanisms share a common
Andre H?bner:
Hello,
i try to set up safe etrn.
i use in main.cf
smtpd_etrn_restrictions = check_etrn_access hash:/etc/postfix/etrn-domains
reject
if etrn-domain is found /etc/postfix/etrn-domains returns name of 2nd
restriction which checks by check_client_access other file for
Andre Hübner wrote:
setup works but there is still security-problem that a client ip which
is allowed for etrn is requesting mails for other domain.
is there a combination of restrictions to make it safe or is an own
policy-service better solution?
As of ETRN works this is not to be
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:04:33PM -0400, wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
alias_maps = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases, dbm:/etc/newcompany/aliases,
nis:mail.aliases
Are you sure you want a local aliases(5) file and not a virtual(5) aliases
file? Generally, and especially for non-system users, the
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Jonjo...@iotk.net wrote:
Looking for some clarification to help me understand. Are
smtpd_*_restrictions processed in this order:
smtpd_client_restrictions
smtpd_helo_restrictions
smtpd_sender_restrictions
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
Jon wrote:
Looking for some clarification to help me understand. Are
smtpd_*_restrictions processed in this order:
smtpd_client_restrictions
smtpd_helo_restrictions
smtpd_sender_restrictions
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
smtpd_data_restrictions
If these restriction mechanisms
On 7/9/2009, Robert Lopez (rlopez...@gmail.com) wrote:
If these restriction mechanisms share a common hash file for their check,
for example:
/etc/postfix/main.cf
...
smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access
hash:/etc/postfix/access_hash ...
...
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:25:40 +1000
Barney Desmond barneydesm...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't done this myself, but I hear policy servers are quite
popular for this sort of thing (the usual question is how to setup
sending quotas for users, so this would be a slight modification).
Yes,
Hello,
I've implemented a milter (SNFMilter), and when I use it with postfix, and send
postfix multiple messages over one SMTP connection, I get the following warning
in the log file:
Jun 18 10:32:58 skidmark postfix/smtpd[11622]: warning: milter unix:/snf-
milter/socket: unexpected filter
Alban Deniz:
Hello,
I've implemented a milter (SNFMilter), and when I use it with postfix, and
send
postfix multiple messages over one SMTP connection, I get the following
warning
in the log file:
Jun 18 10:32:58 skidmark postfix/smtpd[11622]: warning: milter unix:/snf-
On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:01:28 pm Wietse Venema wrote:
Alban Deniz:
Hello,
I've implemented a milter (SNFMilter), and when I use it with postfix,
and send postfix multiple messages over one SMTP connection, I get the
following warning in the log file:
Jun 18 10:32:58 skidmark
Alban Deniz:
On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:01:28 pm Wietse Venema wrote:
Alban Deniz:
Hello,
I've implemented a milter (SNFMilter), and when I use it with postfix,
and send postfix multiple messages over one SMTP connection, I get the
following warning in the log file:
Jun 18
Hi,
I have repeating problem with delivering mail to one of our customers. It looks
like e-mail stays endlessly in active queue. At first I've thought that it might
be some network issue on customer side as my netstat shows something waits for a
long time in Send-Q:
tcp0 86284
Thanks all for the previous help getting postfix up and running with
ldap / tls.. Finally after I don't even know how many build attempts,
,it's up and running :)
My setup is all mail is delivered from a mail host to my postfix from
another server. They do ldap lookups which is working fine.
On Jul 9, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Jon jo...@iotk.net wrote:
Looking for some clarification to help me understand. Are
smtpd_*_restrictions processed in this order:
smtpd_client_restrictions
smtpd_helo_restrictions
smtpd_sender_restrictions
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
smtpd_data_restrictions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there. We use both postgrey and policyd-weight to block spam.
policyd-weight checks against several RBL and DNSBL so each time a mail
is received several queries are done in order to get a score. On the
other side, we have a filter with postgrey
Ignacio Garcia wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there. We use both postgrey and policyd-weight to block spam.
policyd-weight checks against several RBL and DNSBL so each time a mail
is received several queries are done in order to get a score. On the
other side, we have
Jakub Nadolny:
Jul 8 12:43:33 zonk postfix/qmgr[7095]: DF7C21811E53:
from=sender.n...@mycompany.pl, size=4254293, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
Jul 8 13:33:40 zonk postfix/qmgr[16317]: DF7C21811E53: skipped, still being
delivered
Jul 8 13:34:41 zonk postfix/qmgr[16317]: DF7C21811E53: skipped,
Alban Deniz:
It seems to me that if postfix is expecting an SMFIR_ADDHEADER
milter response after invoking the xxfi_envfrom application
1) Postfix does not invoke xxfi callbacks. Instead, Postfix sends
messages to the milter application, where libmilter invokes
the application callbacks.
2)
Hello, I have been looking into this for the better part of today. I
am using a proxy in front of postfix. In order to be able to AUTH a
user through the proxy, the proxy needs the 250-AUTH credentials to
show up.
I discovered that mynetworks disables this for those hosts listed in
Scott Haneda:
Hello, I have been looking into this for the better part of today. I
am using a proxy in front of postfix. In order to be able to AUTH a
user through the proxy, the proxy needs the 250-AUTH credentials to
show up.
I discovered that mynetworks disables this for those
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009, brian moore wrote:
I haven't done this myself, but I hear policy servers are quite
popular for this sort of thing (the usual question is how to setup
sending quotas for users, so this would be a slight modification).
Yes, postfixpolicyd can do this.
The real trick
35 matches
Mail list logo
