Forgive me if this is a FAQ, but I've looked all over and I don't see
it addressed.
I have a wildcard MX record for *.example.com which points to
mail.example.com. I know how to configure postfix to accept
individual virtual domains such as host1.example.com, but how can I
set it up to handle any
I was wondering...
>>> smtpd_banner = Infracom Mail Server
>>>
>> Don't change this unless you have a really good reason.
>> Some functionality can be lost by those connecting to you and the
>> current line breaks the SMTP standard.
> Ok, thx I'll revert this to the default then ;-)
>
>> There are
Hi All.
I want to restrict the smtpd with reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch
when the sasl login name and the sender mismatch.
So I need to set a lookup tables for the smtpd_sender_login_maps.
But I only want to check if the login name and the user that the first part of
the sender(u..
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:43 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> > I need a sender dependent smtp service for my shared postfix servers
> > This is similar to what was discussed in the thread a month ago
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg18419.html
> >
> >
> > This i
ram:
> I need a sender dependent smtp service for my shared postfix servers
> This is similar to what was discussed in the thread a month ago
> http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg18419.html
>
>
> This is because some of our clients require a dedicated outgoing IP
> ( for se
Stefan Foerster:
> from /var/log/mail.log:
> Dec 31 01:49:47 nemea postfix/postscreen[2994]: PASS OLD 168.100.1.4
>
> # postmap -q 168.100.1.4 btree:/var/lib/postfix/ps_cache
> 1262188493
>
> # date --date "Dec 31 01:49:47" "+%s"
> 1262220587
>
> # echo $(((1262220587-1262188493)/3600))
> 8
>
>
from /var/log/mail.log:
Dec 31 01:49:47 nemea postfix/postscreen[2994]: PASS OLD 168.100.1.4
# postmap -q 168.100.1.4 btree:/var/lib/postfix/ps_cache
1262188493
# date --date "Dec 31 01:49:47" "+%s"
1262220587
# echo $(((1262220587-1262188493)/3600))
8
If a client that has passed postscreen in
* Wietse Venema :
> Systems that run close to the capacity limit probably should not
> expire caches but simply rotate them. I already have a version of
> Postfix that allows you to turn off cache cleanup.
I deployed 20091230-nonprod before I went to town this evening and
until now, the
As a side note:
* Stefan F??rster :
I took care of that problem - permanently. I understand that an UTF-8
encoded realname might pose serious problems to some MUAs and I don't
want to cause any, erm, "inconveniences".
Stefan
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 05:08:23PM +0100, Stefan F??rster wrote:
>
> > > What database type are you using?
> >
> > Berkeley DB 4.6.21-11 from libdb4.6_4.6.21-11_amd64.deb.
>
> That's software package not database type. Is it "hash" or "btree"?
$ postconf postscreen_cache_m
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:49:24PM +0100, Philippe Cerfon wrote:
> When havin a domain that hast just aliases on no real maliboxes, on
> could either use virtual_alias_domains or virtual_mailbox_domains and
> in the later case simply not creating any mailboxes but just
> configuring addresses in v
Hi.
When havin a domain that hast just aliases on no real maliboxes, on
could either use virtual_alias_domains or virtual_mailbox_domains and
in the later case simply not creating any mailboxes but just
configuring addresses in virtual_alias_maps.
Is there any performance benfit or something like
Bryan Allen wrote:
+--
| On 2009-12-30 10:43:48, Port Able wrote:
|
| I am currently consulting for a small retailer. They have been using
| an online email service provider for the past few years to blast
| personaliz
On 12/30/2009 3:19 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Geert Hendrickx wrote:
>> Then do the recipient domain validity check *before* accepting and
>> queuing the message: put "reject_unknown_recipient_domain" in your
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions. This will make Postfix respond with:
>>
>> 450 4.1.2
--- On Wed, 12/30/09, Bryan Allen wrote:
[a lot of useful points]
--
bda
cyberpunk is dead. long live cyberpunk.
This is very helpful information - thanks a bunch! This gives me the
confidence to go ahead to build a test environment based on Postfix.
--- On Wed, 12/30/09, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
You really should ask this question on spam-l. There is an ESP discussion
currently taking place. Would be perfect timing.
Far more important that the software platform you choose to do this is your
deliverability. Good ESPs know how to keep their cu
--- On Wed, 12/30/09, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Software such as mailman or ezmlm is more suited to mailing lists.
> All such software can use Postfix to do the delivery.
Well. usually people use sql+php style software for generating this kind
of spam messages ;)
--
Eero
That is a good point.
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:07:01PM -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
My understanding is a MUA (for convenience, call it Thunderbird) will talk
to a local MTA (Postfix, of course!) to send mail. After authentication and
any other local checks, the local MTA accepts respon
Thx for the reply.
>> postconf -n
>>
>> smtpd_banner = Infracom Mail Server
>>
> Don't change this unless you have a really good reason.
> Some functionality can be lost by those connecting to you and the
> current line breaks the SMTP standard.
Ok, thx I'll revert this to the default then ;-)
>
On 12/30/09 8:49 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 12/30/2009 1:43 PM, Port Able wrote:
I am currently consulting for a small retailer. They have been using
an online email service provider for the past few years to blast
personalized emails to their customers (opt-in, and 100-200 thousa
+--
| On 2009-12-30 10:43:48, Port Able wrote:
|
| I am currently consulting for a small retailer. They have been using
| an online email service provider for the past few years to blast
| personalized emails to their cus
Port Able put forth on 12/30/2009 12:43 PM:
> I am currently consulting for a small retailer. They have been using an
> online email service provider for the past few years to blast
> personalized emails to their customers (opt-in, and 100-200 thousand
> emails at a time). They have asked me to s
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Port Able wrote:
> I am currently consulting for a small retailer. They have been using an
> online email service provider for the past few years to blast personalized
> emails to their customers (opt-in, and 100-200 thousand emails at a time).
> They have asked m
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 05:08:23PM +0100, Stefan F??rster wrote:
> > What database type are you using?
>
> Berkeley DB 4.6.21-11 from libdb4.6_4.6.21-11_amd64.deb.
That's software package not database type. Is it "hash" or "btree"?
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 07:42:28PM +0530, ram wrote:
> use in your transport file
> domain.comsmtp:mailhost.domain.com
>
> for mailhost.domain.com , create 2 MX records
At that rate the OP could simply use an alternate DNS view, set the
MX for the parent domain as needed, and skip the trans
On 12/30/2009 1:45 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> This only changes if *you* tell Postfix not to. The config below does
> not follow this.
Should read:
This only changes if *you* tell Postfix not to. The config below does
not show any such weakness.
On 12/30/2009 1:43 PM, Port Able wrote:
> I am currently consulting for a small retailer. They have been using
> an online email service provider for the past few years to blast
> personalized emails to their customers (opt-in, and 100-200 thousand
> emails at a time). They have asked me to see i
On 12/30/2009 1:43 PM, Port Able wrote:
> I am currently consulting for a small retailer. They have been using an
> online email service provider for the past few years to blast
> personalized emails to their customers (opt-in, and 100-200 thousand
> emails at a time). They have asked me to see i
On 12/30/2009 11:21 AM, Serge Fonville wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install a postfix server and everything seemed to work ok.
> Until I tried to mail from a remote domain to a remote domain, but
> from 'telnet localhost 25'
> I understand (suspect) this works because 127.0.0.0/8 is in mynetworks
I am currently consulting for a small retailer. They have been using
an online email service provider for the past few years to blast
personalized emails to their customers (opt-in, and 100-200 thousand
emails at a time). They have asked me to see if we can install an
email server in house to acc
Hi,
I'm trying to install a postfix server and everything seemed to work ok.
Until I tried to mail from a remote domain to a remote domain, but
from 'telnet localhost 25'
I understand (suspect) this works because 127.0.0.0/8 is in mynetworks.
How do I ensure that my mail server can only send mail
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:26:45AM +0100, Stefan F??rster wrote:
> > I've noticed a vast deterioration of the databases's performance,
> > though. 20091209 only emitted some timing warnings for updates from
> > time to time (database rotated every Saturday as per your
> > reco
Stefan F?rster:
> * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > * Wietse Venema :
> > > Dec 29 04:20:17 spike postfix/postscreen[44900]: cache
> > > /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db full cleanup: retained=134 dropped=19 entries
> > > Dec 29 06:19:33 spike postfix/verify[46072]: cache
> > > /var/lib/postfix/verify.db full
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:58:32AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> - When validating the recipients, normalisation and all other rewritings
> (canonical and virtual aliases) are taken into account?
> Is it here where the probe messages are sent?
No probe messages. Don't confuse passive t
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:26:45AM +0100, Stefan F??rster wrote:
> I've noticed a vast deterioration of the databases's performance,
> though. 20091209 only emitted some timing warnings for updates from
> time to time (database rotated every Saturday as per your
> recommendation). With the new cod
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:38 +0300, Luis Conrado Andrade wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> But my server use an DNS server where the MX for domain.com points to them.
> In the relay_domain, I have domain.com and to send this message I have to use
> the transport file. How can I set internal MX servers and
I need a sender dependent smtp service for my shared postfix servers
This is similar to what was discussed in the thread a month ago
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg18419.html
This is because some of our clients require a dedicated outgoing IP
( for sender accreditation
Hi Ralf,
But my server use an DNS server where the MX for domain.com points to them. In
the relay_domain, I have domain.com and to send this message I have to use the
transport file. How can I set internal MX servers and set postfix to check the
domain again?
Thanks.
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Luis Conrado Andrade :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have this situation
> >
> > 2 postfix accting as a relay for domain.com and 2 internal exchange
> > servers as mailbox server. I have MX records pointing to both postfix
> > servers, so if one is down the message is sent to t
* Luis Conrado Andrade :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have this situation
>
> 2 postfix accting as a relay for domain.com and 2 internal exchange
> servers as mailbox server. I have MX records pointing to both postfix
> servers, so if one is down the message is sent to the other. I want to
> do the same for i
Hi,
I have this situation
2 postfix accting as a relay for domain.com and 2 internal exchange servers as
mailbox server. I have MX records pointing to both postfix servers, so if one
is down the message is sent to the other. I want to do the same for internal
servers, so I would like to now
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:07:01PM -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> My understanding is a MUA (for convenience, call it Thunderbird) will talk
> to a local MTA (Postfix, of course!) to send mail. After authentication and
> any other local checks, the local MTA accepts responsibility for the messag
Quoting Michael :
I have a couple of mail servers that act only as SMTP relay, and SMTP backup
servers.
How can I reject invalid recipient addresses at these servers?
I have investigated the manual on local_recipient_maps, however it appears
that this is only useful for email where the machine
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 22:09 +1300, Michael wrote:
> I have a couple of mail servers that act only as SMTP relay, and SMTP backup
> servers.
>
> How can I reject invalid recipient addresses at these servers?
>
> I have investigated the manual on local_recipient_maps, however it appears
> that th
I have a couple of mail servers that act only as SMTP relay, and SMTP backup
servers.
How can I reject invalid recipient addresses at these servers?
I have investigated the manual on local_recipient_maps, however it appears
that this is only useful for email where the machine involved is the fi
45 matches
Mail list logo
