Wietse:
Again. if something can already be done with smtpd plus milter or
policy plugin or content filter then I urge you to keep using that
already existing functionality.
and also said,
Postscreen's purpose is to keep zombies away so that you can keep
using the existing smtpd features.
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:43:30PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The lookup is always a cache miss. Then an SMTP probe is sent. Dictionary
attacks always yield cache misses.
You are forgetting that dictionary attacks are almost exclusively queries
for non-existent
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Your syntax is bad. And this question was answered on the amavisd-new
mailing list, though it probably should have been asked on the
spamassassin list. Please do not cross-post.
I am sorry but I do not wanted to do cross-post but also on the SpamAssassin
ml have told
Thanks for the config hint.
It works fine if I add an email address like this to generic
laserjetscan...@domain.local notificati...@domain.com
It does not work if I want to do the following:
@domain.com notificati...@domain.com
It then appears to rewrite the recipients address as well and
Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz put forth on 12/2/2010 2:40 AM:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:43:30PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The lookup is always a cache miss. Then an SMTP probe is sent. Dictionary
attacks always yield cache misses.
You are forgetting that dictionary
Hi!
I'm using postfix 2.5 and configured LDAP as lookup table for my virtual map
like this:
ldapvirtualfoobar_server_host = ldap://myserver:389
ldapvirtualfoobar_search_base = dc=my,dc=ldap,dc=base
ldapvirtualfoobar_query_filter = ((objectClass=someClass)(someAttribute=%s))
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz put forth on 12/2/2010 2:40 AM:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:43:30PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The lookup is always a cache miss. Then an SMTP probe is sent. Dictionary
attacks always yield cache misses.
You are forgetting
On 02/12/2010, at 06:25, DTNX/NGMX Postmaster wrote:
On 01/12/2010, at 23:18, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Martin Kellermann put forth on 12/1/2010 9:19 AM:
so, is it still (seven years later) The right thing™ to do ?
will it work proper with exchange 2007/2010 ?
since the usage of script-generated
but i see a strange double-bounce in mail.log which i don't understand:
double-bounce is account used for validation of user account.
--
Eero
Am 02.12.2010 13:11, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
but i see a strange double-bounce in mail.log which i don't understand:
double-bounce is account used for validation of user account.
thank you for explaining this... so everything seems to be fine so far...
is this user name configurable?
Hi Sönke
to check for aliases we use the following ldap-config-file for postfix
2.5.6:
# virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf
server_host = ldaphost.mydomain.com
server_port = 389
search_base = ou=postfix,dc=mydomain,dc=com
query_filter = ((mail=%s)(objectclass=qmailuser))
On Thu, December 2, 2010 7:20 am, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
They have corrected it, the infected source for download is
replaced, but no warning at all for the ones who already downloaded and now
using the trojaned version...
Not very encouraging to use Proftpd.
Andreas,
fwiw, I got this
Victor Duchovni:
Because I am not thinking about normal loads that don't matter. One
needs to survive hostile loads.
LDAP tables are supported and not discouraged, but high volume sites
may want to dedicate some LDAP replicas to MTA queries.
I'm not discouraging anyone from using
Wietse Venema:
Victor Duchovni:
Because I am not thinking about normal loads that don't matter. One
needs to survive hostile loads.
LDAP tables are supported and not discouraged, but high volume sites
may want to dedicate some LDAP replicas to MTA queries.
I'm not
Sönke Schwardt-Krummrich schwa...@univention.de writes:
Hi!
I'm using postfix 2.5 and configured LDAP as lookup table for my virtual map
like this:
ldapvirtualfoobar_server_host = ldap://myserver:389
ldapvirtualfoobar_search_base = dc=my,dc=ldap,dc=base
ldapvirtualfoobar_query_filter =
Hi:
I'm running Postfix 2.3.3 for a domain 'mydomain.com' with some users
hosted locally (with Cyrus IMAP) and some others are hosted by a MS
Exchange server.
I configured a transport map for all users that need to be relayed to
the MS exchange like this:
exchangeus...@mydomain.com
On 12/2/2010 9:32 AM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
Hi:
I'm running Postfix 2.3.3 for a domain 'mydomain.com' with some users
hosted locally (with Cyrus IMAP) and some others are hosted by a MS
Exchange server.
I configured a transport map for all users that need to be relayed to
the MS exchange like
On 12/02/2010 09:40 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
In order for this to work, you should add non-local user aliases to
virtual_alias_maps using the fully qualified addresses on both the
left and right sides.
virtual_alias_maps are global and you *should not* add anything to
On 12/2/2010 10:08 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/02/2010 09:40 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
In order for this to work, you should add non-local user aliases to
virtual_alias_maps using the fully qualified addresses on both the
left and right sides.
virtual_alias_maps are global
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
grkni...@scent-team.com wrote:
On 12/2/2010 9:32 AM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
Hi:
I'm running Postfix 2.3.3 for a domain 'mydomain.com' with some users
hosted locally (with Cyrus IMAP) and some others are hosted by a MS
Exchange
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:28:47AM +0100, S??nke Schwardt-Krummrich wrote:
I'm using postfix 2.5 and configured LDAP as lookup table for my virtual map
like this:
ldapvirtualfoobar_server_host = ldap://myserver:389
ldapvirtualfoobar_search_base = dc=my,dc=ldap,dc=base
On 12/02/2010 10:10 AM, michael.h.gr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for the config hint.
It works fine if I add an email address like this to generic
laserjetscan...@domain.local notificati...@domain.com
It does not work if I want to do the following:
@domain.com notificati...@domain.com
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:23:33PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 12/02/2010 10:10 AM, michael.h.gr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for the config hint.
It works fine if I add an email address like this to generic
laserjetscan...@domain.local notificati...@domain.com
It does not work if
Hello All,
I have a mail server (postfix 2.2.10, Devecot, IMSS/SPS 7.0).
I noticed recently that some emails are delivered with very late (some
hours, one or 2 days) even if the emails are sent from a local domain user
to a local domain user.
In the mailq, i can see the bounced emails with
hiii
Check the main.cf conf file and open the postfix sending socket connection.
Try this below commands
postqueue -f
postsuper -r ALL
Thanks Regards,
Ravindra Gupta
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Rachid Abdelkhalak rac...@mtds.com wrote:
Hello All,
I have a mail server (postfix
On 12/2/2010 1:14 PM, Rachid Abdelkhalak wrote:
Hello All,
I have a mail server (postfix 2.2.10, Devecot, IMSS/SPS 7.0).
Note: this is quite old. While considered stable, it will be no longer
updated.
I noticed recently that some emails are delivered with very late (some
hours, one or 2
Rachid Abdelkhalak:
Hello All,
I have a mail server (postfix 2.2.10, Devecot, IMSS/SPS 7.0).
I noticed recently that some emails are delivered with very late (some
hours, one or 2 days) even if the emails are sent from a local domain user
to a local domain user.
In the mailq, i can
Thank you Ravindra
What do you meen by 'Check the main.cf conf file and open the postfix
sending socket connection.' ?
Thank you
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Ravindra Gupta // Viva wrote:
hiii
Check the main.cf conf file and open the postfix sending socket connection.
Try this below commands
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Rachid Abdelkhalak wrote:
Thank you Ravindra
What do you meen by 'Check the main.cf conf file and open the postfix sending
socket connection.' ?
Thank you
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Ravindra Gupta // Viva wrote:
hiii
Check the main.cf conf file and open the postfix
--On December 2, 2010 11:11:40 AM -0500 Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
In the LDAP email schemas I am familiar with, mail is the *primary*
email address, and is not multi-valued. It is unfortunate that it is
multi-valued in your particular schema. We have:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:01:45AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
In the LDAP email schemas I am familiar with, mail is the *primary*
email address, and is not multi-valued. It is unfortunate that it is
multi-valued in your particular schema. We have:
mail:
--On Thursday, December 02, 2010 2:31 PM -0500 Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
It is sensible to have a designated attribute for the primary (canonical
if you like) email address. If the RFC LDAP schemas don't support this,
that's too bad for the RFC schemas.
Part of
Hi good people
It's a special case I know but I would like in postfix to restrict
incoming emails from outside world by the senders from domain?
(not by senders mailserver ip - we already do spf to insure that)
Cheers Martin
* Martin Schiøtz mali...@gmail.com:
Hi good people
It's a special case I know but I would like in postfix to restrict
incoming emails from outside world by the senders from domain?
Like what for example? Anything check_sender_access can'T do?
(not by senders mailserver ip - we already do
Wietse Venema put forth on 12/2/2010 7:35 AM:
Victor Duchovni:
Because I am not thinking about normal loads that don't matter. One
needs to survive hostile loads.
LDAP tables are supported and not discouraged, but high volume sites
may want to dedicate some LDAP replicas to MTA queries.
Martin Kellermann put forth on 12/2/2010 6:08 AM:
and there's a 5 sec. delay ... seems way too long to me for just
checking the recipient...!?
That delay should be no longer than what a typical delivery to the
Exchange server would be. Since no message is sent, it should be
shorter by quite a
Stan Hoeppner:
Yes, as always. I've simply been looking at this from the premise that
our countermeasures which stop spam connections before the RCPT TO stage
will also stop dictionary attacks before the RCPT TO stage since such
attacks typically come from the same types of sources. ...
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 04:08:09PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Martin Kellermann put forth on 12/2/2010 6:08 AM:
and there's a 5 sec. delay ... seems way too long to me for just
checking the recipient...!?
That delay should be no longer than what a typical delivery to the
Exchange
On 12/02/2010 10:29 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 12/2/2010 10:08 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/02/2010 09:40 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
In order for this to work, you should add non-local user aliases to
virtual_alias_maps using the fully qualified addresses on both
Martin Kellermann put forth on 12/2/2010 6:08 AM:
relay=IP[IP]:PORT, delay=5.7, delays=0.6/0/0.03/5.1, dsn=5.1.1,
--
and there's a 5 sec. delay ... seems way too long to me for just
checking the recipient...!?
Completion of support for time stamps from different stages
Victor Duchovni put forth on 12/2/2010 4:27 PM:
The OP is really far better off querying the LDAP server:
That may be Viktor. I think he should test both and pick the solution
that works best in his environment, both from a performance and
management perspective. Choice is usually a good
OT, sorry, just to finish up this thread:
myself:
I'm working on a SpamAssassin plugin to implement Spamhaus DWL
(and other 'SA tag'- based DNS lookups).
Done.
Available in the SpamAssassin SVN trunk (on its way to become 3.4.0):
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6518
Hi All,
I have configured backup server, which is working as expected when ever primary
not reachable mail are queued in back Mail server, later pushes to primary mail
server.
I would like to know, how to make backup to primary mail server, in case
primary is down due to major issues. so
On 12/02/2010 11:15 PM, Ramesh wrote:
Hi All,
I have configured backup server, which is working as expected when
ever primary not reachable mail are queued in back Mail server, later
pushes to primary mail server.
I would like to know, how to make backup to primary mail server, in
case
44 matches
Mail list logo
