-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In IRC, many of us help people test their installations. One of the
important tests we stress is using telnet to understand what isn't
working as expected. Unfortunately, we haven't been able to find a
clear and complete explanation of how to use tel
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Please file a ZFS bug reportug. As per POSIX, when the O_CREAT is
> > specified to open(),
> > The third argument does not affect whether the file is open
> > for reading, writing or for both.
> > In other words, read/write access is controlled with the O_RDWR fla
Le 23/03/2011 01:30, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> Steve Jenkins:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Didn't I write that Postfix will attempt the unextended name first,
>>> before trying the name without the text after $recipient_delimiter?
>>
>> I'm assuming you meant "exten
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen van Aart
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 2:21 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: bcc: header
>
> > The post service doesn't care what Cc: you write on your lett
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 1:00 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: bcc: header
>
> Am 23.03.2011 20:55, schrieb Jeroen van Aart:
> > I t
Hi
I'm still trying to get Postfix to use deliverquota to deliver the mails to my
Maildirs.
The only thing I could find on the net was a comment from Magnus
http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0412/1673.html that I had to make my own
pipe.
So this is my attempt:
deliverquota unix -
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:07:06PM -0700, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
> > If all you changed was adding a local DNS cache, unless your previous
> > cache was >100ms away, you'll not see much change.
>
> Actually, after doing some tests with d
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> If all you changed was adding a local DNS cache, unless your previous
> cache was >100ms away, you'll not see much change.
Actually, after doing some tests with dig on our colo provider's DNS
servers we noticed that they were taking an av
What I want:
on a 10.10 ubuntu minimal system install
postfix/dovecot configured w/ smtp for outgoing
fetchmail works
procmail works
My trouble surrounds smtp auth and since I have never used imap I'll deal with
that last.
Ultimately I want all my email in one place so clients can connect from
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:07:43PM -0300, Odilo Schwade Junior wrote:
>
> > It is not my IP address. I don't know if it's a zombie.. I just think it may
> > be.. XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX = random IPs address. Most of Brazil, Portugal
> > and US as I said earlier.
>
> You can restri
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:07:43PM -0300, Odilo Schwade Junior wrote:
> It is not my IP address. I don't know if it's a zombie.. I just think it may
> be.. XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX = random IPs address. Most of Brazil, Portugal
> and US as I said earlier.
You can restrict SASL to TLS only, then perhaps
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:41:25AM -0700, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
> > A LAN DNS server with a 2ms lookup delay is fine. Unbound, bind, ...
> > does not matter.
>
> Thanks for all the nudges in the right direction. We're now running
> Unbou
It is not my IP address. I don't know if it's a zombie.. I just think it may
be..
XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX = random IPs address. Most of Brazil, Portugal and US as I
said earlier.
thanks
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 a
Carlos Mennens:
> and I think I need SASL authentication (correct me please if I'm
> wrong) and since both Postfix 2.8.1 & Dovecot 2.0.11 are configured /
> using TLS, is there anything else I would need beyond SASL or that you
> recommend for sending email from my Android powered mobile?
TLS + SA
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> A LAN DNS server with a 2ms lookup delay is fine. Unbound, bind, ...
> does not matter.
Thanks for all the nudges in the right direction. We're now running
Unbound on the same box as Postfix, getting cached responses in 0 msec
from the Pos
So I have Postfix working great and I've always used webmail if I
needed to send email from PC's outside of $mynetworks. So fast forward
to today where I got my 1st Android powered mobile phone and I can
configure the Android mail client to send/receive IMAP email but my
question is do I need to be
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:42:58AM -0300, Odilo Schwade Junior wrote:
> Mar 24 10:17:10 mailserver postfix/smtpd[9301]: warning: SASL authentication
> failure: All-whitespace username.
> Mar 24 10:17:10 mailserver postfix/smtpd[9301]: warning:
> unknown[XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX]: SASL LOGIN authentication
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:28:21AM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>> Thx, Joe. Any advantage IYNSHO to running a full blown bind server as
>> opposed to something simpler like dnsmasq or nsd (or anything else
>> you're recommend)?
> Most of the time "simple" caching resolvers are faster at cor
Hi, our mail server started to show up a warning about the SASL auth, and
I'm starting to get some issue with pop3 and smtp. I'm not able to download
the messages on my mail client, and there is some messages that weren't send
by our system.
I did some research, but couldn't find any useful inform
On 3/24/2011 3:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Then trigger on the sender address.
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_access
/etc/postfix/sender_access:
user@example 450 4.7.0 Please see http://www.example/whatever for
Tom Kinghorn:
> On 3/24/2011 3:10 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > If you make the rule too specific, no-one will fix their application.
> > The following moves the pain to the party that is making the problem:
> >
> > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> > smtpd_client_restrictions =
> > check_clien
Hi postfix users list ,
I just light a candle for Japan Victims.
Join us to pray for those who have lost their lives and hope for the best for
those who have survived.
It is time to light a candle and Pray...
Please Light a Candle Now at: http://www.socialkonnekt.com/Tsunami/
Warm Regards,
On 3/24/2011 3:10 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
If you make the rule too specific, no-one will fix their application.
The following moves the pain to the party that is making the problem:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_acc
On 3/24/2011 3:09 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:54:03AM +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
If you can figure out how to do this without relying on content,
other options are available, including restriction classes and
policy servers:
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_READM
Tom Kinghorn:
> Good afternoon list.
>
> We have a number of clients who have misconfigured applications on their
> network, which is sending
> anything from warning to info messages to the developer.
>
> Our servers are used as an outbound relay (smarthost) for our clients.
>
> Is there a wa
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:54:03AM +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> We have a number of clients who have misconfigured applications
> on their network, which is sending anything from warning to info
> messages to the developer.
>
> Our servers are used as an outbound relay (smarthost) for our
> clie
Good afternoon list.
We have a number of clients who have misconfigured applications on their
network, which is sending
anything from warning to info messages to the developer.
Our servers are used as an outbound relay (smarthost) for our clients.
Is there a way to filter messages before the
Zitat von Steve Jenkins :
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Joe wrote:
IMNSHO it's standard practice to run a dns server on the MX host. If you
don't want a full blown bind server, at least run some sort of caching dns
server; the difference in the lookup times has a big impact when you're
send
* Jeroen van Aart :
> I am curious if postfix would be able to send out 30 emails in
> one hour, to different recipients of course. Taking into account
> http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html and other such performance
> tuning guides. This would only happen once a week or so. The
> importa
29 matches
Mail list logo
