Kov?cs Albert:
Wietse:
>If you want forward to different recipient addresses, then don't
>use always_bcc.
>
>Instead, use recipient_bcc_maps which allows you to specify different
>addresses for different recipients.
[example deleted]
Kov?cs Albert:
>Thanks Wietse, it works. However, is there a cha
Dnia 2012-05-30, śro o godzinie 22:08 +0100, t t pisze:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm using postfix aliases for mapping incoming emails to my mailman
> mailing lists, as described in the "Adding MySQL aliases" of this
> guide:
>
>
> http://freemars.org/howto/mailman.html#conadd
>
>
> What I'd like to do is
Cool, thanks for the response. I'm in the process of setting this up right
now, but while I do that, I have a couple quick questions:
1) This seems like it might redirect *all* mail coming from
from_address@domain to new_to_address@anotherdomain. That's not quite what
I want. In my first example,
Hello,
I'm still looking for a reliable workaround to my alias >
external_address problem using postini for outbound relay...
I just realized that if there were a simple way to do the same as
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps, but for recipients (ie,
recipient_dependent_relayhost_maps), this w
Charles Marcus:
> Hello,
>
> I'm still looking for a reliable workaround to my alias >
> external_address problem using postini for outbound relay...
>
> I just realized that if there were a simple way to do the same as
> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps, but for recipients (ie,
> recipient_dep
On 2012-05-31 6:00 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
If this alias is a mailing list, you set the envelope sender
accordingly (like any mailing list).
No, these are simply aliases I have set up in my virtual alias maps.
There are two different uses for these aliases...
1. We have (currently) 3 accou
Charles Marcus:
> On 2012-05-31 6:00 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > If this alias is a mailing list, you set the envelope sender
> > accordingly (like any mailing list).
>
> No, these are simply aliases I have set up in my virtual alias maps.
> There are two different uses for these aliases...
>
On 2012-05-31 7:29 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
If you need a recipient-dependent override for outbound delivery,
consider using a transport map, and use relayhost for the remainder.
I guess you didn't bother reading my entire email (no worries, I tend to
ramble)... ;)
At the end, I asked about
Charles Marcus:
> On 2012-05-31 7:29 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > If you need a recipient-dependent override for outbound delivery,
> > consider using a transport map, and use relayhost for the remainder.
>
> I guess you didn't bother reading my entire email (no worries, I tend to
> ramble)... ;
Hello
We've been having huge problems delivering email to hotmail addresses
(Hotmail is blocking all our emails since yesterday without any
plausible reason). Microsoft's phone support is non-existant and they
don't reply to any of our emails, even those sent from Hotmail
addresses. Filled in
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:01:22PM +0100,
webmas...@elaconta.com wrote:
> Anyway, since hundreds of mailboxes in our server are unable right
> to to send emails to Hotmail, we need to find some alternative.
> Relaying emails with an @hotmail.com destination through another
> email server that
Em 2012-05-31 14:17, /dev/rob0 escreveu:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:01:22PM +0100,
webmas...@elaconta.com wrote:
Anyway, since hundreds of mailboxes in our server are unable right
to to send emails to Hotmail, we need to find some alternative.
Relaying emails with an @hotmail.com destination t
Em 2012-05-31 14:22, webmas...@elaconta.com escreveu:
Em 2012-05-31 14:17, /dev/rob0 escreveu:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:01:22PM +0100,
webmas...@elaconta.com wrote:
Anyway, since hundreds of mailboxes in our server are unable right
to to send emails to Hotmail, we need to find some alternat
I did review the
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#authorized_submit_users page and
it mentions that patterns can be negated, here are the relevant strings
of the docs I thought applicable to this case.
Specify a list of user names, "/file/name" or "type:table" patterns ...
Speci
Please don't top-post your replies here. It makes the conversation
much harder to follow.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:35:25AM -0400, JLP wrote:
> On 5/30/2012 7:24 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> >On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 05:05:16PM -0400, JLP wrote:
> >>Originally, I was trying to make "smtpd_sender_restri
Hello
I having problems with some emails that arrives 2 or 7 times to their
destination I have check the log and each time they generate a different ID,
other issue that probably is related is this error I get in my log
May 30 12:23:23 mail postfix/local[22794]: 1023A80188: to=,
relay=local, d
Hi everybody,
I would like to know if it's possible to prevent postfix to NOT send a
MAILER DAEMON email back to the sender if something is wrong?
thanks in advance,
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:24:31PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > I tried unsuccessfully making some
> > form of unix:group.byname work like these options:
> > authorized_submit_users=!unix:group.byname, static:all
> > authorized_submit_users=!unix:group.byname=badUnixGroup, static:all
> >
>
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:09:09AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >If you want forward to different recipient addresses, then don't
> >use always_bcc.
> >
> >Instead, use recipient_bcc_maps which allows you to specify different
> >addresses for different recipients.
> [example deleted]
>
> Kov?cs
Hello
Would it be possible with Postfix to have a file containing users
authorized to
use the .forward facility ?
We really need such utility , students are playing too much with forwarding
and this generate a lot of troubles with great free email providers, but
in the
same time our professo
Frank Bonnet:
> Hello
>
> Would it be possible with Postfix to have a file containing users
> authorized to
> use the .forward facility ?
No. You can
a) Specify a forward_path that does not include the UNIX home
directory, and move all .forward files there (leaving behind a
symlink so that user
On 5/31/2012 4:01 AM, t t wrote:
> Cool, thanks for the response. I'm in the process of setting this up
> right now, but while I do that, I have a couple quick questions:
>
> 1) This seems like it might redirect /all/ mail coming
> from from_address@domain to new_to_address@anotherdomain. That's n
On 5/31/2012 8:43 AM, webmas...@elaconta.com wrote:
> I previously had hotmail.com assigned to a slow transport to only
> send one email to hotmail every five minutes in order not to tax
> Microsoft's poor email servers:
>
> hotmail.com slow:
>
> Now i'm wondering, is there any way to combine
Noel Jones wrote:
On 5/31/2012 8:43 AM, webmas...@elaconta.com wrote:
I previously had hotmail.com assigned to a slow transport to only
send one email to hotmail every five minutes in order not to tax
Microsoft's poor email servers:
hotmail.com slow:
Now i'm wondering, is there any way
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:48:04PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Frank Bonnet:
> > Hello
> >
> > Would it be possible with Postfix to have a file containing users
> > authorized to
> > use the .forward facility ?
>
> No. You can
>
> a) Specify a forward_path that does not include the UNIX home
thank you wiese
Envoyé de mon iPhone.
Le 31 mai 2012 à 18:48, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> Frank Bonnet:
>> Hello
>>
>> Would it be possible with Postfix to have a file containing users
>> authorized to
>> use the .forward facility ?
>
> No. You can
>
> a) Specify a forward_path that does not
Adding a haproxy-to-postscreen adapter turns out to be pretty
trivial. However, a major code rewrite would be needed in the way
that postscreen(8) talks to smtpd(8).
Begin background:
Postscreen is optimized for the following case: a client connects,
postscreen looks up the client IP address in
Hi.
>From yesterday many servers to i admin has been banned to send
messages to hotmail. The error is related to said: 550 SC-001
Do you are experimenting the same issue today?
Thanks and regards.
* kazabe :
> Hi.
>
> From yesterday many servers to i admin has been banned to send
> messages to hotmail. The error is related to said: 550 SC-001
>
> Do you are experimenting the same issue today?
mail.python.org is working as before.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Ne
Le jeudi 31 mai 2012 à 13:37 -0500, kazabe a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> From yesterday many servers to i admin has been banned to send
> messages to hotmail. The error is related to said: 550 SC-001
>
> Do you are experimenting the same issue today?
>
> Thanks and regards.
I do not encounter any proble
Hi everybody,
I've thoght to use a kind of fishing, virus and bots RBL to stop (or almost)
spam sending by my users.
Any tip?
BR,
Alfredo
I experienced this last week ;
I changed the server that send to hotmail, live etc using transport
as the new server is not on the same subnet than the preceding
it seems to work ;-)
Le 31/05/2012 21:27, ml a écrit :
Le jeudi 31 mai 2012 à 13:37 -0500, kazabe a écrit :
Hi.
From yesterday
Hi,
On Thu, 31 May 2012 10:01:07 +0100
t t wrote:
> so I need to redirect based both on the sender and
> the mailing list
address rewriting is possible with qpsmtpd. The disadvantage is that it's a
second smtpd, but it works.
- Chris
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:37 PM, kazabe wrote:
> Hi.
>
> From yesterday many servers to i admin has been banned to send
> messages to hotmail. The error is related to said: 550 SC-001
>
> Do you are experimenting the same issue today?
>
> Thanks and regards.
Hi, you're not alone, we're having th
Hi Postfix users,
I have to apology: This is not a Postfix problem. But since there seem
to be not mailing list for GLD, I was thinking that maybe some of you
may be using postfix-gld and have some clue for me.
BTW, if you know of a mailing list that would be more appropriate for
this question
Den 2012-05-31 18:28, Frank Bonnet skrev:
Would it be possible with Postfix to have a file containing users
authorized to use the .forward facility ?
...
We really need such utility , students are playing too much with
forwarding
and this generate a lot of troubles with great free email pro
Hi,
I've got a weird configuration issue that I'm trying to track down.
I've got a partial ipv6 network where some machines have public
addresses and some of them only have link local (fe80::/10) addresses.
I just upgraded my mail server to a public v6 address and now a bunch of
my other machines
- Original Message -
From: "Masoumeh Izadi"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 1:14 PM
Subject: Telnet not authenticating
Hi;
We have a postfix Email server . when someone telnet to port 25 on our
server, it is possible to send email from any ID user1@ anydomain to any
user2@ mydo
Hi,
My Postfix setup works quite well blocking most spam. But I sometimes
get spam with (to my untrained eye) valid MAIL from: and RCPT to: email
addresses but in the DATA section there is a forged From:
. At least that's how it works when I use telnet to
port 25 on my Postfix box.
I tried the ex
Am 01.06.2012 02:07, schrieb Patrick Lists:
> My Postfix setup works quite well blocking most spam. But I sometimes
> get spam with (to my untrained eye) valid MAIL from: and RCPT to: email
> addresses but in the DATA section there is a forged From:
> . At least that's how it works when I use tel
Hello all having a problem getting postfix to send email, i think its sort of
related to virtual machine/LAN/WAN/MX i'm sure its a simple fix but i cannot
seem to get postfix to do what i want when i try to send email to myseld i get
the following errors in the mail.log
May 31 18:03:13 erp pos
Am 01.06.2012 02:15, schrieb RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN:
> This machine is on the same LAN as the server its ip is 10.0.0.108 and the
> server is 10.0.0.102 however these
> machines are all virtual on the same hardware. As seen in the logs postfix
> trys to deliver to the external ip
> 204.X.X.X whe
Hi Reindl,
On 01-06-12 02:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> I tried the example header_checks [1] from the BACKSCATTER_README which
>> work fine except that they also block my own email. What is the proper
>> way to block forged From: addresses in the DATA section?
>
> there is no proper way
>
> simpl
On 5/31/2012 7:15 PM, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
> Hello all having a problem getting postfix to send email, i think
> its sort of related to virtual machine/LAN/WAN/MX i'm sure its a
> simple fix but i cannot seem to get postfix to do what i want when i
> try to send email to myseld i get the fol
Thanks alot for your replies and i went with the easier fix for now using a
transport worked like a charm
However not before I messed around with my Bind server till i got super
confused i will get around to setting up a split DNS soon just not today, as i
have my hands full with other things.
Dnia 2012-05-31, czw o godzinie 10:01 +0100, t t pisze:
> an email from pers...@gmail.com to mail...@example.com should go
> to mailm...@lists.example.com,
>
>
> an email from pers...@gmail.com to another_l...@example.com should go
> to another_li...@lists.example.com,
>
>
> an email from pers
I was wondering if others on this list are also facing this , gmail
breaking off some connections
All my postfix mailq is increasing because gmail , sporadically , times
out some connections.
Jun 1 07:40:37 mmail14 postfix/smtp[17190]: 8D3CD5E6D00: conversation
with gmail-smtp-in.l.google.c
47 matches
Mail list logo
