Re: abusive language by Reindl

2013-01-14 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2013-01-14 Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.01.2013 23:18, schrieb Matthias Andree: Sorry for the noise, and apologies for confusing two persons. One has apparently learned their lesson, the other jumped to defend the trespasser and has now resorted to insults rather than limiting himself to

Re: Please end - Re: Learning how to respecth REPLY-TO headers

2013-01-14 Thread Benny Pedersen
Robert Moskowitz skrev den 2013-01-13 19:49: I did take this off list to Wietse, but it is worst than you make it out to. It can even vary by sender to a list. reply-all in roundcube sends ONLY to maillist not private while reply ONLY reply private why cant all others copy that ? :)

Re: Naming a master.cf attribute (RFC: postconf user interface)

2013-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Robert Moskowitz: It does raise a question if there is an uncomment option? For example submission is commented in the master.cf and a very frequent uncomment target. I don't understand how that would work. Wietse

Re: Question about SMTP Relay per destination

2013-01-14 Thread Rafael Azevedo - IAGENTE
Thanks Wietse, but I think I was not clear enough. I'm already doing what you told me to do, but what I'm trying to do is to have one specific SMTP to relay for these specific domains. I've already done the homework and now have 100% of all domains to this specific destination mapped (it has

Re: Question about SMTP Relay per destination

2013-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Rafael Azevedo - IAGENTE: Thanks Wietse, but I think I was not clear enough. I'm already doing what you told me to do, but what I'm trying to do is to have one specific SMTP to relay for these specific domains. As far as I know, SMTP is a protocol defined in RFC 5321 and its predecessors. -

Re: Question about SMTP Relay per destination

2013-01-14 Thread Rafael Azevedo - IAGENTE
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: - If you mean something else, please stop wasting my time. Thank you for your time. - Rafael

Ignore inet if unavailable

2013-01-14 Thread l...@airstreamcomm.net
I prepared a script to work with check_policy_service using inet, however I find that when the service is unavailable Postfix dies and no longer accepts messages. Is there a method that would allow Postfix to ignore the inet connection if it were unavailable and continue checking other rules?

Re: Ignore inet if unavailable

2013-01-14 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 14.01.2013 15:25, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net: I prepared a script to work with check_policy_service using inet, however I find that when the service is unavailable Postfix dies and no longer accepts messages. Is there a method that would allow Postfix to ignore the inet connection

Re: Naming a master.cf attribute (RFC: postconf user interface)

2013-01-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/14/2013 03:59 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Robert Moskowitz: It does raise a question if there is an uncomment option? For example submission is commented in the master.cf and a very frequent uncomment target. I don't understand how that would work. Actually, I don't either! SInce both

Gotcha (Naming a master.cf attribute (RFC: postconf ...))

2013-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Robert Moskowitz: On 01/14/2013 03:59 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Robert Moskowitz: It does raise a question if there is an uncomment option? For example submission is commented in the master.cf and a very frequent uncomment target. I don't understand how that would work. Actually, I

Re: Gotcha (Naming a master.cf attribute (RFC: postconf ...))

2013-01-14 Thread Pau Amma
On Mon, January 14, 2013 4:46 pm, Wietse Venema wrote: I did not expect that Postfix would end up with little-endian versus big-endian issues, but there we are. JANET (dammit!) (Probably showing my age on several counts.)

Re: Gotcha (Naming a master.cf attribute (RFC: postconf ...))

2013-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Pau Amma: On Mon, January 14, 2013 4:46 pm, Wietse Venema wrote: I did not expect that Postfix would end up with little-endian versus big-endian issues, but there we are. JANET (dammit!) The puzzled reader may want to look up http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/mail-directories/janet.sites

saslauth configuration question

2013-01-14 Thread Charles Bradshaw
I am considering switching my smptd from sendmail to postfix, but I am a little confused. The following snip from http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html /etc/sasl2/smtpd.conf: pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN Do not specify any other mechanisms in mech_list than PLAIN

SASL authentication fails

2013-01-14 Thread Muzaffer
Hi, I'm trying to get postfix/dovecot working on a Webmin enabled server and I can't get SASL working for the life of me. Below are my logs and postconf -n. Logs --- Jan 14 19:47:12 ommuse postfix/smtpd[8911]: connect from mail-da0-f45.google.com[209.85.210.45] Jan 14 19:47:12 ommuse

Re: SASL authentication fails

2013-01-14 Thread Brian Evans
On 1/14/2013 3:02 PM, Muzaffer wrote: Hi, I'm trying to get postfix/dovecot working on a Webmin enabled server and I can't get SASL working for the life of me. Below are my logs and postconf -n. Logs --- Jan 14 19:47:12 ommuse postfix/smtpd[8911]: connect from mail-da0-f45.google.com

Re: Naming a master.cf attribute (RFC: postconf user interface)

2013-01-14 Thread mouss
Le 11/01/2013 21:47, Wietse Venema a écrit : Viktor Dukhovni: The only part that is tricky is the command + args column, where users arguably may want to add/delete -o flags, but in general the various -o flags one may want to add are not necessarily othogonal, and it is not always safe to

postfix rejecting mail: 555 5.5.4 Unsupported option: AUTH=

2013-01-14 Thread Jaap van Wingerde
/var/log/old/mail.log-20121219.gz: ... Dec 18 20:12:33 gaugino postfix/smtpd[1954]: Anonymous TLS connection established from ch1gmehub08.msn.com[207.46.200.12]: TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits) Dec 18 20:12:34 gaugino policyd-spf[1956]: spfcheck: pyspf result: ['None', '', 'helo'] Dec

Re: saslauth configuration question

2013-01-14 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Charles Bradshaw b...@bradcan.homelinux.com: I am considering switching my smptd from sendmail to postfix, but I am a little confused. The following snip from http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html /etc/sasl2/smtpd.conf: pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN Do

Re: postfix rejecting mail: 555 5.5.4 Unsupported option: AUTH=

2013-01-14 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 01/14/2013 10:55 PM, Jaap van Wingerde wrote: Is microsoft.com and versatel.nl sending mail with invalid AUTH? What means: SPF Permanent Error: Too many DNS lookups'? Permanent Error seems fairly self-explanatory to me. That said, postfix contains no SPF functionality. You'll have to

Re: postfix rejecting mail: 555 5.5.4 Unsupported option: AUTH=

2013-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Jaap van Wingerde: Dec 18 20:12:34 gaugino postfix/smtpd[1954]: warning: proxy 127.0.0.1:10025 rejected MAIL FROM:account-security-nore...@microsoft.com SIZE=5696 AUTH=: 555 5.5.4 Unsupported option: AUTH= Easy fix: don't announce AUTH support on the MX service port. Harder fix: turn on AUTH

Just more complaining about mail headers that impact replying

2013-01-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Part of my real job is working on IEEE 802 standards. They have had their own listserv for a while now (not too long about they did everything on paper), and although I am the chair of 802.15.9, I have no control over my own mailing list. Thunderbird is not recongnizing this as a list and

Re: Copy email with ALL headers (inc. BCC)

2013-01-14 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 01/10/2013 02:05 AM, Jean-Luc Wasmer wrote: Hi, I've searched the mailing lists but every time the proposed solution involves using sender_bcc_maps (or other form of bcc'ing). The problem with adding a BCC to the incoming email is that other BCC headers will be dropped to the recipient of

Re: Just more complaining about mail headers that impact replying

2013-01-14 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 01/14/2013 11:48 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Just complaining while listing to a MAC simulation presentation for 802.15.8. :) Complaining about... what ? This is the postfix-users mailing list, for help with the postfix MTA. -- J.

Re: saslauth configuration question

2013-01-14 Thread jeffrey j donovan
On Jan 14, 2013, at 5:09 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter p...@sys4.de wrote: Is there a rational explanation or do I just put it down to a ghost in the machine? I am confused too, because I had it first hand from Alexey Melnikov, who is one of the main developers of Cyrus SASL, and he told me

OT - Re: Just more complaining about mail headers that impact replying

2013-01-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/14/2013 03:37 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 01/14/2013 11:48 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Just complaining while listing to a MAC simulation presentation for 802.15.8. :) Complaining about... what ? This is the postfix-users mailing list, for help with the postfix MTA. Sorry,

Rewrite delivery address if spam

2013-01-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
For some users I would like to redirect spam to special addresses. For example, if I were to get spam (like 500/day) I would like it to go to rgm-s...@htt-consult.com. My search fu is weak, and I have not found any guidance on this. To further the complexity, I would have a mysql table for

Re: Rewrite delivery address if spam

2013-01-14 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.01.2013 01:23, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: Oh, my wife is regularly insulted by the spam she gets. It would really bring some peace in the house if she no longer saw ANY spam, and I did the checking once a week of a different mail account if there was something she should see...

Re: Rewrite delivery address if spam

2013-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Robert Moskowitz: For some users I would like to redirect spam to special addresses. If the content filter can add a header, then Postfix can trigger a REDIRECT action with header_checks. This will override all recipients. Wietse

Re: Rewrite delivery address if spam

2013-01-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/14/2013 04:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 15.01.2013 01:23, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: Oh, my wife is regularly insulted by the spam she gets. It would really bring some peace in the house if she no longer saw ANY spam, and I did the checking once a week of a different mail account

Re: Rewrite delivery address if spam

2013-01-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/14/2013 04:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Robert Moskowitz: For some users I would like to redirect spam to special addresses. If the content filter can add a header, then Postfix can trigger a REDIRECT action with header_checks. This will override all recipients. OK. I will read up on

Re: Rewrite delivery address if spam

2013-01-14 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.01.2013 02:14, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: I am already doing the filtering and watching lots of messages go to spam and every so often, when I need to search for a message, I search junk and trash, and there it is. I get maybe 1 important false postive per 10,000 spams. poor, on hard

Postfix incoming mail spooling taking a long time

2013-01-14 Thread Fred Ho
Hi, I found there're quite a lot of cleanup processes running and found that the incoming mails are still being spooled to /var/spool/postfix/incoming which started hours ago. May I ask why the spooling is taking so long? Is it the network? Thanks. [root@mailgate2 ~]# ps -ef|grep cleanup

Re: Postfix incoming mail spooling taking a long time

2013-01-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Fred Ho: Hi, I found there're quite a lot of cleanup processes running and found that the incoming mails are still being spooled to /var/spool/postfix/incoming which started hours ago. May I ask why the spooling is taking so long? Is it the network? Thanks. You haven't even tried to find

Re: Postfix incoming mail spooling taking a long time

2013-01-14 Thread Fred Ho
Hi, The CPU usage is low: [root@mailgate2 incoming]# uptime 09:36:24 up 77 days, 23:19, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.00, 0.00 top - 09:47:30 up 77 days, 23:30, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Tasks: 151 total, 1 running, 150 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.3% us,

Re: Postfix incoming mail spooling taking a long time

2013-01-14 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:48:32AM +0800, Fred Ho wrote: While other incoming mails are delivered, these incoming mails are slowly being spooled for hours and the file size are growing: [root@mailgate2 incoming]# ls -l total 106988 -rw--- 1 postfix postfix 34369536 Jan 15 09:40

Re: Rewrite delivery address if spam

2013-01-14 Thread Noel Jones
On 1/14/2013 7:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 01/14/2013 04:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Robert Moskowitz: For some users I would like to redirect spam to special addresses. If the content filter can add a header, then Postfix can trigger a REDIRECT action with header_checks. This will

Re: SASL authentication fails

2013-01-14 Thread Muzaffer Tolga Ozses
myPhone'dan gönderdim 14 Oca 2013 tarihinde 22:37 saatinde, Brian Evans grkni...@scent-team.com şunları yazdı: On 1/14/2013 3:02 PM, Muzaffer wrote: Hi, I'm trying to get postfix/dovecot working on a Webmin enabled server and I can't get SASL working for the life of me. Below are my logs