Re: valid email addresses being rejected

2014-10-11 Thread Benny Pedersen
On October 10, 2014 11:35:09 PM Robert Lopez rlopez...@gmail.com wrote: I looked at the Please see. Thanks! I will try this out. postfix stop postmap hash:/etc/postfix/hashfile postfix start Loosy workaround Better solution is to use a maptype that dont need posfix reload

Re: valid email addresses being rejected

2014-10-11 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 12.10.2014 um 01:35 schrieb Benny Pedersen: On October 10, 2014 11:35:09 PM Robert Lopez rlopez...@gmail.com wrote: I looked at the Please see. Thanks! I will try this out. postfix stop postmap hash:/etc/postfix/hashfile postfix start Loosy workaround that is *not* a workaround,

Re: valid email addresses being rejected

2014-10-11 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 01:43:19AM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: just generate your map file in a temp folder, map it there and move both files to /etc/postfix, you can easily do that for a lot of map files and only if the result have changed compared with the ones in /etc/postfix move them

Re: valid email addresses being rejected

2014-10-11 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 12.10.2014 um 02:59 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni: On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 01:43:19AM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: just generate your map file in a temp folder, map it there and move both files to /etc/postfix, you can easily do that for a lot of map files and only if the result have changed

Re: Compiling new postfix same as the old postfix

2014-10-11 Thread LuKreme
On 10 Oct 2014, at 18:42 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: A few minutes ago I updated the makedefs script so that it documents the make makefiles options in a comment at the beginning of the file makedefs.out which is usually installed in $config_directory. Is this something that

Re: Postfix 3.0

2014-10-11 Thread LuKreme
On 10 Oct 2014, at 11:55 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: However with the incompatible changes in 2), I think that a major version number change is necessary. This may cause some delays in adoption, but I think it is only fair to people who have come to expect that upgrading

Re: Thank you, Wietse

2014-10-11 Thread LuKreme
On 10 Oct 2014, at 18:49 , Stephen Satchell l...@satchell.net wrote: Sometimes we just need to say this. Probably every day, but then the list would get kinda spammy and boring. But yes, thanks. -- Cecil is made of blood and unfinished leather

Re: valid email addresses being rejected

2014-10-11 Thread LuKreme
On 11 Oct 2014, at 17:43 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote: Am 12.10.2014 um 01:35 schrieb Benny Pedersen: On October 10, 2014 11:35:09 PM Robert Lopez rlopez...@gmail.com wrote: I looked at the Please see. Thanks! I will try this out. postfix stop postmap hash:/etc/postfix/hashfile postfix

Re: Postfix 3.0

2014-10-11 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:11:20PM -0600, LuKreme wrote: If I were in charge, I think I would look at releasing 2.12 and 3.0 nearly concurrently, with the difference being mainly that 2.12 has the backward compatible checking of the conf files while 3.0 does not and moves forward with the new

Re: Thank you, Wietse

2014-10-11 Thread Venkat
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 7:12 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: On 10 Oct 2014, at 18:49 , Stephen Satchell l...@satchell.net wrote: Sometimes we just need to say this. Probably every day, but then the list would get kinda spammy and boring. But yes, thanks. -- Cecil is made of blood