Am 17.10.2014 um 07:49 schrieb Andre Rodier:
I have a few users who don't understand bounced messages, and consider
them as an error from our system. I won't even try to educate them.
I would like to know if there is a way to use HTML messages to send
beautiful bounces messages (internally)
Hello,
the documentation states:
The milter_header_checks mechanism could also be used for
whitelisting. For example it could be used to skip heavy content
inspection for DKIM-signed mail from known friendly domains.
I want to do that for mail that passes DMARC checks (with 2.11.2 DMARC
became
Andre Rodier:
Hi,
I have a few users who don't understand bounced messages, and consider
them as an error from our system. I won't even try to educate them.
I would like to know if there is a way to use HTML messages to send
beautiful bounces messages (internally) but continue to send
Sebastian Wiesinger:
Hello,
the documentation states:
The milter_header_checks mechanism could also be used for
whitelisting. For example it could be used to skip heavy content
inspection for DKIM-signed mail from known friendly domains.
I want to do that for mail that passes DMARC
John:
On 14/10/2014 11:14 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014, John wrote:
recipient address hidden host MX.cogeco.ca[216.221.81.26] said: 451
Postmaster
Code 5 - #4.1.8 Domain of sender addressj...@klam.ca does not
resolve.
Try again, it's just a temporary
Wietse Venema:
Sebastian Wiesinger:
Hello,
the documentation states:
The milter_header_checks mechanism could also be used for
whitelisting. For example it could be used to skip heavy content
inspection for DKIM-signed mail from known friendly domains.
I want to do that for
(This message is mostly of interest to Claus Assmann)
This week I fixed a problem or PREPEND actions in access maps or
policy server reponses that was giving problems with DMARC setups
that combine of SPF policy server with a DKIM Milter.
Meanwhile, Christian R??ner has pointed out that there
Am 17.10.2014 um 16:48 schrieb Wietse Venema:
(This message is mostly of interest to Claus Assmann)
This week I fixed a problem or PREPEND actions in access maps or
policy server reponses that was giving problems with DMARC setups
that combine of SPF policy server with a DKIM Milter.
On 17 Oct 2014, at 04:51 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
The harder you try, the fewer people will read your bounce message.
Honestly, I do not think it is possible for there to be fewer people who read
bounces.
Customized LOCAL bounce messages would be nifty. I don't want HTML
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:49:15 -0600
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 17 Oct 2014, at 04:51 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
The harder you try, the fewer people will read your bounce message.
Honestly, I do not think it is possible for there to be fewer people
who read
On 10/17/2014 12:32 PM, jdebert wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:49:15 -0600
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 17 Oct 2014, at 04:51 , Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
The harder you try, the fewer people will read your bounce message.
Honestly, I do not think it is possible for
On October 17, 2014 7:49:34 AM Andre Rodier an...@rodier.me wrote:
I have a few users who don't understand bounced messages, and consider
them as an error from our system. I won't even try to educate them.
So thay understand more if it was html ?, hmm
I would like to know if there is a way
Milter requests [...].
I have patches for evaluation:
Postfix 2.12 released 20140918 or later:
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto-header-hide-2.12.patch
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches
wietse:
I have patches for evaluation:
Postfix 2.12 released 20140918 or later:
just compiling ...
Postfix 2.8, 2.9. 2.10, 2.11, and Postfix 2.12 released before 20140918:
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto-header-hide-2.12.11
A. Schulze:
wietse:
I have patches for evaluation:
Postfix 2.12 released 20140918 or later:
just compiling ...
Postfix 2.8, 2.9. 2.10, 2.11, and Postfix 2.12 released before 20140918:
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto
Wietse Venema:
To avoid [incompatibility] with Sendmail, Postfix would have to
implement the same behavior as Sendmail: ignore the MTA's own
received header when reporting headers to Milters, but don't ignore
the MTA's own received header when receiving Milter requests [...].
I have
Andreas Schulze:
Wietse Venema:
To avoid [incompatibility] with Sendmail, Postfix would have to
implement the same behavior as Sendmail: ignore the MTA's own
received header when reporting headers to Milters, but don't ignore
the MTA's own received header when receiving Milter
17 matches
Mail list logo
