Am 23. Jänner 2016 04:30:02 MEZ, schrieb Nguyen Nang Thang
:
>- Original Message -
>> From: "Wietse Venema"
>> To: "Postfix users"
>> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 9:57:40 AM
>> Subject: Re: Postfix Postscreen Pregreet Test
>
>> Nguyen Nang Thang:
>>> > Postfix sends:
>>> >
>>> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Wietse Venema"
> To: "Postfix users"
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 9:57:40 AM
> Subject: Re: Postfix Postscreen Pregreet Test
> Nguyen Nang Thang:
>> > Postfix sends:
>> >
>> >220-myhostname ESMTP
>> >
>> > Postfix waits $postscreen_greet_wait sec
Nguyen Nang Thang:
> > Postfix sends:
> >
> > 220-myhostname ESMTP
> >
> > Postfix waits $postscreen_greet_wait seconds.
> > Bad SMTP clients will greet before $postscreen_greet_wait seconds
> > have passed.
> >
> > 220 myhostname ESMTP
> >
> > Good SMTP clients will greet now.
>
> Wie
- Original Message -
> From: "Wietse Venema"
> To: "Nguyen Nang Thang"
> Cc: "Postfix users"
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 9:09:09 AM
> Subject: Re: Postfix Postscreen Pregreet Test
> Nguyen Nang Thang:
>> >> > domain zen.spamhaus.org as 127.0.0.4
>> >> > Jan 22 00:00:53 spike post
Nguyen Nang Thang:
> >> > domain zen.spamhaus.org as 127.0.0.4
> >> > Jan 22 00:00:53 spike postfix/postscreen[44350]: PREGREET 16 after 0.69
> >> > from
> >> > [177.231.207.212]:38026: HELO bryozoann\r\n
> >
> > That is a zombie that speaks before its turn.
>
> Ok, I'm clear about the operation
- Original Message -
> From: "Wietse Venema"
> To: "Postfix users"
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 8:21:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Postfix Postscreen Pregreet Test
> Nguyen Nang Thang:
>> > domain zen.spamhaus.org as 127.0.0.4
>> > Jan 22 00:00:53 spike postfix/postscreen[44350]: PREGREET 1
Richard B. Pyne:
> I am seeing thousands (19000 today) of Illegal address syntax errors in
> my logs that I suspect are coming from malware attempting to send spam.
> The IP address shown is from our corporate firewall. The mail server is
> outside.
>
> We require logging in to send mail, but I
I am seeing thousands (19000 today) of Illegal address syntax errors in
my logs that I suspect are coming from malware attempting to send spam.
The IP address shown is from our corporate firewall. The mail server is
outside.
We require logging in to send mail, but I can't figure out how to tra
Nguyen Nang Thang:
> > domain zen.spamhaus.org as 127.0.0.4
> > Jan 22 00:00:53 spike postfix/postscreen[44350]: PREGREET 16 after 0.69 from
> > [177.231.207.212]:38026: HELO bryozoann\r\n
That is a zombie that speaks before its turn.
Quoting from POSTSCREEN_README"
When an SMTP client sends a
- Original Message -
> From: "Wietse Venema"
> To: "Postfix users"
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org, u...@porcupine.org
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 7:29:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Postfix Postscreen Pregreet Test
> Nguyen Nang Thang:
>> I donot know how to demonstrate the test "postscree
Nguyen Nang Thang:
> I donot know how to demonstrate the test "postscreen_greet_wait" to know that
> Postscreen is protecting zombies/spambots that speak before its turn.
> Any tools or ways for this test?
Turn it on, and let the zombies be your testers.
Jan 22 00:00:53 spike postfix/postscreen[4
Hi all,
I've used Postfix/Postcreen to protect zombies/spambots to our email system.
Currently, I've setup the pregreet test of Postscreen as configuration below:
In main.cf:
postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks,
cidr:/etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr
postscreen_blacklist_action = enfo
In message <20160122213312.gk25...@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:14:22PM -0500, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
>
> > You might
> > also want to report that the keys they use are less than LOW security
> > but that might be a feature.
>
> You're mistaken
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:14:22PM -0500, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> You might
> also want to report that the keys they use are less than LOW security
> but that might be a feature.
You're mistaken. These ciphers are HIGH.
> Note that none of the ciphers used by comcast.net support even low
> s
In message <20160122041647.gh25...@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:55:19PM -0500, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
>
> > It took a while to get a dumpfile. My tcpdump command only covered a
> > subset of comcast.net mailhosts.
> >
> > This has a failed TLS
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 1:23 PM, Roman Doe wrote:
>
> Dear community,
> I'm trying to learn how to set a server using Postfix, this is a very complex
> craft and I can't grasp yet the full potential of this tool. I would need to
> know if it can do these actions :
It seems to me that for such
Dear community,
I'm trying to learn how to set a server using Postfix, this is a very
complex craft and I can't grasp yet the full potential of this tool. I
would need to know if it can do these actions :
*Filtering incoming messages on :* *Rewritting headers and envelops :*
*Restrict
allowed reci
On 01/02/2016 01:30 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
how does one tell postfix/submission what principal to use, when in a load
balanced environment and the keytab differs from the smtp/$(uname -n)@REALM
formula?
A single keytab file can contain keys for multiple principals. On the
Postfix side the s
On 22/01/16 23:38, Serhii Laskavyi wrote:
> Hi postfix users,
>
> I just noticed, that my postfix-2.10.1-6.el7.x86_64 under CentOS
> Linux release 7.1.1503 adds timezone name to the Date header.
>
> According to https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt (3.3. Date
> and Time Specification), time
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:33:53 +0200
Serhii Laskavyi wrote:
> This problem is visible when a third-party php
> script is sending email without "Date:" header.
fix it, or use another 3rd php script which is compliant
with RFC. i quote from that link (Patrick Ben Koetter)..
"By RFC the mail client
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:38:21 +0200
> Serhii Laskavyi wrote:
>> I wonder if this problem is still present in a current
>> version of Postfix.
22 січень 2016 р. о 18:28 +0700, k...@wijatmoko.name пише:
> few days ago, there similar question about "date".
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.p
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:38:21 +0200
Serhii Laskavyi wrote:
> I wonder if this problem is still present in a current
> version of Postfix.
few days ago, there similar question about "date".
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/253853
which MUA do you use?
--
Koko Wijatmoko
Thank you! I will give Postfix version 2.11.6 a try.
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/postfix-installation-and-make-error-ATTENTION-Unknown-system-type-tp81524p81532.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi postfix users,
I just noticed, that my postfix-2.10.1-6.el7.x86_64 under CentOS
Linux release 7.1.1503 adds timezone name to the Date header.
According to https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt (3.3. Date
and Time Specification), timezone name is not required and some MTA
(mdaemon) are rej
Thank you all for your prompt reply.
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/postfix-installation-and-make-error-ATTENTION-Unknown-system-type-tp81524p81530.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 02:44:54AM -0700, timos wrote:
> I'm new to Postfix. I tried to compile postfix-2.11.3 but ran into an error
> and failed with following message:
Support for Linux 4.x was added to the "makedefs" script in Postfix
versions 2.9.14, 2.10.8, 2.11.6, 3.0.2 and snapshot 3.1-20
On 2016-01-22 10:44, timos wrote:
I'm new to Postfix. I tried to compile postfix-2.11.3 but ran into an
error
and failed with following message:
Why don't you compile postfix 3.x?
make -f Makefile.in MAKELEVEL= Makefiles
(echo "# Do not edit -- this file documents how Postfix was built for
yo
* timos :
> I'm new to Postfix. I tried to compile postfix-2.11.3 but ran into an error
> and failed with following message:
>
> make -f Makefile.in MAKELEVEL= Makefiles
> (echo "# Do not edit -- this file documents how Postfix was built for your
> machine."; /bin/sh makedefs) >makedefs.tmp
> A
I'm new to Postfix. I tried to compile postfix-2.11.3 but ran into an error
and failed with following message:
make -f Makefile.in MAKELEVEL= Makefiles
(echo "# Do not edit -- this file documents how Postfix was built for your
machine."; /bin/sh makedefs) >makedefs.tmp
ATTENTION:
ATTENTION: Un
29 matches
Mail list logo
