1. This maybe off topic.
2. I am currently unable to get at the output of postconf -n etc.
In the past we have had occasional problems with DKIM signing not working.
It would be one or two emails and we would not find out about the problem
immediately. Often the sender would put it down a tran
In message <49c94ad9-3c94-4c48-9726-0e81e1109...@dukhovni.org>
Viktor Dukhovni writes:
> > On Jan 31, 2016, at 1:01 AM, Curtis Villamizar
> > wrote:
> >
> > I use tcsh so:
> >
> > # sh -c 'postconf -c $(postconf -dh config_directory ) \
> > -h multi_instance_directories'
> > postconf: w
On Jan 30, 2016, at 22:42, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> It would be:
>
> cd /usr/local/etc
> mv postfix postfix.old
> ln -s ../../../etc/postfix postfix
No, it most certainly would not. Your configuration files ARE in local, if you
want to pretend they are in /etc, then create a link in etc.
> Mailman requires local(8) delivery via an aliases(5) file that
> belongs to the mailman user. With any luck the OP will post actual
> configuration details to this list, rather than some website most
> readers won't bother to look at, and someone how knows Postfix<->mailman
> integration will p
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:35:51PM -0500, Steven Kiehl wrote:
> Another thing to try is running the 'postfix check' command to test if
> there are any obvious configuration errors.
Neither the debug level suggestion nor this one are likely to be
of any use.
> I'd have to defer to someone else mo
Another thing to try is running the 'postfix check' command to test if
there are any obvious configuration errors. As I said before, I'm not
familiar with a 'virtual_email2email' configuration, which is not
documented on the Postfix website; I believe people just use that as their
alias map config
dead steven
i ve just checked, bot variables virtual_alias_maps and
virtual_email2email point to the file
/var/lib/mailman/data/virtual_mailman,
which contains:
mail...@lists.ifkuk.org mailman
mailman-ad...@lists.ifkuk.org mailman-adm
Not having used Mailman in a Postfix setup before, I can only speculate a
bit. From what I can tell, all your mail is delivering through the dovecot
transport and no transport designation is being performed for the mailman
address aliases. I'm not familiar with a virtual_email2email configuration
Hey guys
since three days I am stuck with a problem and it seems to me I am blind
for the solution by digging
into it so much, so I need your help to have a look at it please!
our server is up and running dovecot/postfix on debian 8 for three years
by now, without any problems.
I urgently needed
Am 31.01.2016 um 18:04 schrieb Ron Garret:
>
> On Jan 31, 2016, at 1:28 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 31.01.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Ron Garret:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> What is the usual way to start a milter process? Can postfix be configured
>>> to spawn it automatically, or does the milter h
OK, that’s exactly what I needed to know. Thanks!
On Jan 31, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
> OK, but is there any way to get Postfix to restart a milter if it goes down?
> By default, if a milter goes down, it takes postfix down w
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
> OK, but is there any way to get Postfix to restart a milter if it goes
> down? By default, if a milter goes down, it takes postfix down with it.
The usual way to start a milter service is to have it autostart when the
server boots, just as y
On Jan 31, 2016, at 1:28 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 31.01.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Ron Garret:
>> Hello,
>>
>> What is the usual way to start a milter process? Can postfix be configured
>> to spawn it automatically, or does the milter have to be set up as a
>> separate service? If the f
Hi,
spot on: I did have indeed the override_options set not to do any
header_body_checks. I just removed the option which should hopefully fix my
problem.
Many thanks again. I didn’t think of this.
Best regards
Sebastian
> Am 31.01.2016 um 14:44 schrieb wilfried.es...@essignetz.de:
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
do you use amavis in before or after queue mode?
If before, you should possibly look to your master.cf, to the lines
who get the mail from amavis back. Do you have somthing like
-o receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks
or
-o header_checks=
there ?
Willi
Am 31.01.2
No, you can use PCRE lists with check_sender_access too.
I use it successfully to block certain tld's and partial domains.
However, I would suggest using DISCARD instead of REJECT. With REJECT, you tell
the spammer that he got blocked, thus he will switch to a new domain.
With DISCARD, it will si
Hi Sebastian,
yes but this would require me to actually know all the hostnames upfront, i.e.
I cannot use a PCRE regex if I am not mistaken, or?
Thanks.
Best regards
Sebastian
> Am 31.01.2016 um 12:52 schrieb Sebastian Nielsen :
>
> I would suggest use check_sender_access intead of header che
I would suggest use check_sender_access intead of header checks. Then you can
reject based on MAIL FROM:, since apparently the hosts are using their e**.
hostname in MAIL FROM.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
För S
Hi,
I have a problem with a PCRE-based rule in header_checks which seems to be
ignored and I can’t understand why this is the case. Hopefully you guys have an
idea on how to fix this :-)
So here is my setup: I am using Postfix 2.11.7 on FreeBSD 10 and as I am being
bombarded with emails from c
Am 31.01.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Ron Garret:
> Hello,
>
> What is the usual way to start a milter process? Can postfix be configured
> to spawn it automatically, or does the milter have to be set up as a separate
> service? If the former, how do you do it?
>
> Thanks,
> rg
>
milters are usual
Hello,
What is the usual way to start a milter process? Can postfix be configured to
spawn it automatically, or does the milter have to be set up as a separate
service? If the former, how do you do it?
Thanks,
rg
21 matches
Mail list logo
