p searching the web but I couldn't find a resonable cause of this.
(I turned of antispam software and the problem continuous, so it's not
spam filtering - related).
Does anyone come accross this?
Thanks in advanced!
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting fo
ible for this
domains, the
transport is not enough because it may be used for mail-routing and
things
like "error: i told you often enough that this domain does not
exist" too
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer ngtech.co.il
ing and
things
like "error: i told you often enough that this domain does not
exist" too
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2012.0.1913
ould be avoided. I think the decision was made
because the systems are 3000 miles from each other and when the
systems were created more than ten years ago it was thought it would
be better to separate the services.
Thanks Stan,
Alex
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consultin
27;t.
it's collision between directives...
remove the mydestination from relay domains.
domain is either one of three: local(mydestiation), virtual,relay
Regards,
Elizer
Thanks,
Alex
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer ngtech.co.il
about this option.
if i will add a hash: or mysql: table to relayhost with a list of
servers i will need to have parallel records in the
"smtp_sasl_password_maps".
so what in the case of i dont have a record for the domain\server the
default value of relay will be used?
Thanks,
Eliezer
5.1.2 relay transport not permitted
Is there a way to also redirect any attempt to send anything to any
domain other than what has been defined in relay_domains to a defined
email address?
Thank you again!
Eric
--
Eric Kimminau
eak at kimminau dot org
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer ngtech.co.il
stards who
always try auth logins ;-)
tobi
in any case you should get the "postfix/smtpd[***]: connect from...IP"
in a case a connection is initiated from any host to your server.
Regards,
Eliezer
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer ngtech.co.il
ng to put together and integrate will
involve openldap for the user authentication store, dovecot imap,
postfix and SOGo groupware and I'm driving myself crazy figuring out how
to integrate it smoothly.
so what is your question?
which is the difficult part?
Eliezer
--
Eliezer Croitoru
ht
Session aborted, reason: lost connection
For other details, see the local mail logfile
-------
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer ngtech.co.il
_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-users.cf
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:500
========
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer ngtech.co.il
On 03/05/2012 11:04, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 3/5/2012 10:29 πμ, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
just out of curiosity, does this KVM host uses some nas\san for VMs HD?
Yes. It is a cluster of physical servers using a SAN/NAS for data
storage. However, I don't know much more, because it is ope
it seems that this problem is not postfix specific but a more runtim\io
or other low level problem.
Eliezer
On 03/05/2012 11:56, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 3/5/2012 11:43 πμ, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
the thing is it seems like a FS issue or VM cpu\clock issues from the
log.
It might. In the
le lists only a subset"
WAG: Looks like you're missing a hash mark (#) at the beginning of the
line to denote a comment.
queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix
That's not the line it's talking about.
Peter
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting
7) and not port 25 that
is protected by postscreen.
if you get this problem from a client machine it can be caused by
AV|FIREWALL|antispam filtering other then postscreen.
Eliezer
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer ngtech.co.il
CT,
EHLO, HELO, MAIL,MESSAGE, VRFY or ETRN ???
i am able to get RCPT and END-OF-MESSAGE but none of the others.
Thanks,
Eliezer
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer ngtech.co.il
On 7/11/2012 7:35 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Eliezer Croitoru:
i am working on a policy Daemon like policyD
i started reading : www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
but i'm not sure on what phases i can declare a "ceck_policy_service"
i know i can use it on: smtpd_end_of_da
On 1/15/2013 3:10 PM, Alexander Farber wrote:
sorry for the stupid question, but how to use
tcpdump to check for incoming connections?
I've come up only with these commands sofar:
# netstat -an |grep -w 25
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:250.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
# iptables -L|gre
On 1/29/2013 8:07 PM, Mike. wrote:
I implemented the postscreen capability on a small MTA I run for
friends and family. Once I got postscreen configuration producing the
results I wanted, I soon tired of watching the detailed maillog to see
how postscreen was operating. So I wrote a quick shel
ve wrote a script to analyze squid\apache logs before and it's more
complicated then just match a line to a string.
grep in general is faster for exact matches in most cases I have seen
yet and it's amazing.
The same lookup on any other scripting lang will take *3-4 or more.
--
Eliezer Croitoru
Hey,
I am using postfix with spamassassin and a relayhost directive.
The way I am using spamassassin is by the content_filter option.
When I am applying delivery confirmation on a message I am receiving a
confirmation but from spamassassin
I want to get delivery confirmations from my upstream
Hey,
I have a situation with a working postfix install which I am not sure
how to implement.
the main problem is that from time to time I get a "rejected" mail from
a remote system and which I cannot do a thing about.
the setup is like this:
Local client(sasl) ->(submission 587)Local POSTFIX
the
On 09/08/2013 11:47 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>
> Did you ask any other question than the one about transport(5) I
> answered above ?
> If so, I am afraid it was lost in the noise.
Thanks,
No my setup is working perfectly and I know how to ask questions most of
the time.
If I do ask it do mean I
On 11/03/2013 05:41 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
and how is this different to any other e-mail you send over SMTP?
if it fails you get a bounce from your postfix server to the envelope sender
and if you do not get a bounce after 5 days it was delivered - nothing new
Or dropped...
which is like a
I have a recommendation for you:
http://workaround.org/ispmail
It teaches you how it works and not just do a step by step for it to work.
Maybe the old tutorials are nicer but all of them are very good.
Regarding using mysql as DB or not using it as DB it will teach you the
basics of how it all
On 05/27/2014 11:33 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 15:32, Bennett Todd wrote:
>Two thoughts.
>
>I've received legitimate email from a registrar where I was listed as a
>contact for a domain. If no one uses an email address in your domain to
>register, that's not a problem.
Well y
I Have been reading:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html
And I am still unsure on how to go one step forward..
I want to allow my local SMTP authenticated users to be able to s
On 06/15/2014 11:11 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
what you describe is*the minimum* requirement of a sane MTA
you must not allow senders you would not accept incoming messages
and no - there are no exceptions for whatever user
I am not sure you understand it but there is little doubt we are talkin
On 06/16/2014 01:09 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
the point is "relaying via the foreign domain's MSA service"
thats why "sender_dependent_relayhost_maps" exists in postfix
we do the same and feed "sender_dependent_relayhost_maps" as well
as "local_recipient_maps" and "smtpd_sender_login_maps" fro
You can implement a RBL system to share with others.
Eliezer
On 06/19/2014 05:23 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
I sort of do this myself... except I dont use automated stuff like
fail2ban. When I see a pattern, I investigate, and if it comes down to a
known (or "somewhat known") spammer-hosting or
I have modified a script that verifies one IP against a list of RBL that
can be found here:
http://www1.ngtech.co.il/rbl/rblcheck.rb
The tool can download the rbl from the online RBL servers list at:
http://www1.ngtech.co.il/rbl/rbl.csv
If someone has some more RBL to add the list please send m
Hey Peter,
The other alternative to just trust you or distrust you is the
availability of the src.rpm package which will clarify for those who
knows how to look at them, how secure are these packages.
Eliezer
On 08/02/2015 04:19, Peter wrote:
Please note that these packages are not endorsed
While running my mail server I noticed that couple mail servers on the
path identify themselves as "HyperSendmail v2007.08"(mta??).
Anyone heard about such a software? What is this software?
Eliezer
Thanks Fernando,
I have even tried to google "HyperSendmail" but even in the 10th+++ page
I didn't found anything that was meaningful.
At the beginning I was thinking about smtpd_banner but it didn't add up
to me.
In the past I have tried to lookup for hypermail but it was not adding up.
So
OS:Gentoo latest built with kernel 3.2.1 with hardened profile
POSTFIX: v 2.9.1
when i'm configuring on master.cf some listening to port on ip address
that doesn't exist on any interface such as for communicating with
amavis (as if my ip is 192.168.0.20 and i will put 192.168.0.21:25 )
postfix w
On 06/03/2012 21:10, Wietse Venema wrote:
Eray Aslan:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 11:48:35AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
I think that making everyone wait would be another example of
well-meaning people doing things that give Postfix a bad reputation.
postfix start exits successfully but postfix
On 06/03/2012 21:30, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 03/06/12 14:10, Wietse Venema wrote:
Eray Aslan:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 11:48:35AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
I think that making everyone wait would be another example of
well-meaning people doing things that give Postfix a bad reputation.
p
On 06/03/2012 14:17, Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:37:02 +0200
Eliezer Croitoru articulated:
OS:Gentoo latest built with kernel 3.2.1 with hardened profile
POSTFIX: v 2.9.1
when i'm configuring on master.cf some listening to port on ip
address that doesn't exist on any interfa
On 07/03/2012 02:33, Wietse Venema wrote:
Eliezer Croitoru:
i dont care about any init scripts on whatever else then when there is
this specific problem of mismatching binding an ip that dosnt exist to
be checked using the "postfix check" method on terminal and not only on log.
S
On 07/03/2012 03:00, Wietse Venema wrote:
I have uploaded a feature patch that changes "postfix start"
so that it returns after the master daemon has initialized.
This works around a problem on some Linux systems. These don't use
"postfix status" to find out if the mail system still runs. Instea
40 matches
Mail list logo
