Postfix won't start when adding additional daemon entries in main.cf

2009-08-06 Thread James Hankins
Greetings, I'm a new postfix user, I've got a working postfix implementation and trying to get integrate with Amavisd for Spamassassin and clamav. As soon as I try to add a daemon entry such as # = = # service

Re: Postfix won't start when adding additional daemon entries in main.cf

2009-08-06 Thread James Hankins
mmand=yes-o disable_dns_lookups=yes-o max_use=20" Jim On Aug 6, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: James Hankins: = = = = amavisfeed unix- - n- 2 lmtp -o lmtp_data_done

Re: Postfix won't start when adding additional daemon entries in main.cf

2009-08-06 Thread James Hankins
: -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org ] On Behalf Of James Hankins Sent: 06 August 2009 16:01 To: postfix-us...@cloud9.net Subject: Postfix won't start when adding additional daemon entries in main.cf Greetings, I'm a n

Re: Postfix won't start when adding additional daemon entries in main.cf

2009-08-06 Thread James Hankins
DOH! Thank you! On Aug 6, 2009, at 12:15 PM, d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote: Quoting James Hankins : If I do your first line I get host1 postfix[14047]: fatal: /etc/postfix/main.cf, line 34: missing '=' after attribute name: "smtp-amavis unix - - n -

huge volume of SMTP > Tactical AUTH traffic??

2009-08-07 Thread James Hankins
On a new postfix install, I noticed an uptick in bandwidth consumption for a period of time (ended up being about 6 hours). Bulk of traffic was from one host and it sourced from port 2392 (Tacical Auth). From a search on google it stated that this is a vulnerability scanner. Destination

Re: Forged Emails

2009-09-12 Thread James Hankins
One way, albiet expensive on CPU util is reject_unverified_sender. Sends probes to determine if address is valid before accepting delivery. Very effective but if a very busy system you will want to limit it's use. Also exceptions will need to be made for noreply type senders, otherwise man

Re: Forged Emails

2009-09-13 Thread James Hankins
arger amount of probes get sent for one particular domain due to volume of spam coming from that particular domain. But no black lists. Thanks for the response in advance! Regards Jim On Sep 12, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 9/12/2009 1:00 PM, James Hankins wrote: One way, albi