retired in
> 2021.
>
>
>
> Every main.cf config I've seen uses commas. Ive added them to your quote
> below.
>
> On 7/6/2024 11:18 PM, Nick Edwards via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> Main:
> submission_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_rbl_client cbl
Thanks John! You nailed it, made the two changes you suggested, and it is
now blocking, client will be happy,
On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 8:52 PM John Fawcett via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On 07/07/2024 06:18, Nick Edwards via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> Howdy,
Howdy,
I've never seen the point in this before, but i've been asked by a client
to implement it if possible, that is, place dnsbl checks on submission and
smtps connections, I've tried a few combinations but it does not seem to be
working, no doubt someone can see the error and slap me a new one
Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On 24.10.23 14:35, Nick Edwards via Postfix-users wrote:
> > I need a refresher hand with DKIM, we have in main.cf
> >
> >smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891,inet:127.0.0.1:8892
> >non_smtpd_milters = $smtpd_milters
Howdy,
been out of sysadmining for a few years as I was promoted to network ops,
but with dose of that-virus going round our office the sysadmin teams are
all evicted for 2 weeks :)
I need a refresher hand with DKIM, we have in main.cf
smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8891,inet:127.0.0.1:8892
On 10/28/13, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 10/27/2013 4:30 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
submission_client_restrictions =
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/submission.hosts
Typically this first line is all that would be used here to reject
unwanted clients
Following from Charles's thread, but, not directly related, did not
want to hijack it so I'll ask for clarification here.
Having Seen Viktors statement about submission_*_restrictions = and
not putting all that crud into master.cf (yes, my bad too)
If I use:
submission_client_restrictions =
On 3/10/12, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 11:08 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
what type of entries are you using in your SPF record?
i found out that a/mx entries sometimes making troubles and since
we
Hi,
I gave a secondary mx with 2 ipv4 and 2 ipv6 ip's.
I have dns'd one of each protocol for mx and ns
Trying to get postfix to play nice with mx on outbound. hostname,
mynetworks etc all setup right.
I have tried smtp_bind_address(6) but for some reason, although it
uses the correct IP, the
On 3/10/12, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Nick Edwards:
I have tried smtp_bind_address(6) but for some reason, although it
uses the correct IP, the relays are denied for spf failure on the
main server, even though they are all permitted in spf RR, ok, evident
So we know
On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 09.03.2012 16:01, schrieb Nick Edwards:
Hi,
I gave a secondary mx with 2 ipv4 and 2 ipv6 ip's.
I have dns'd one of each protocol for mx and ns
Trying to get postfix to play nice with mx on outbound. hostname,
mynetworks etc all
On 3/10/12, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Nick Edwards:
Is the smtp bind address correct method? or inet_interfaces?
Everybody already knows that smtp_bind_address and smtp_bind_address6
set the correct IP address for SENDING mail.
If the RECEIVING server flags an error
On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 09.03.2012 17:23, schrieb Nick Edwards:
On 3/10/12, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
logs are no good because it simply says rejected (ip) spf -all method.
all other settings wont help either since the two new settings
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Sahil Tandon sahil+post...@tandon.netwrote:
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 13:37:52 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
I am wondering why I have two different errors for same reason?
: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client host
rejected
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.orgwrote:
Sahil Tandon:
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 13:37:52 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
In the absence of full information, here's a WAG:
...
: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client
host
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 12/24/2011 9:37 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
Merry Christmas All!
I am wondering why I have two different errors for same reason?
: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client
host rejected
Merry Christmas All!
I am wondering why I have two different errors for same reason?
: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[41.203.141.1]: 450 4.7.1 Client host
rejected: cannot find your hostname,
: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[115.153.142.125]: 550 5.7.1 Client
host rejected: cannot find
Hello,
This error triggers only with postfix and milter-regex with ipv6
connections.
warning: milter unix:/var/smfs/milter-regex.sock: can't read SMFIC_CONNECT
reply packet header: Success
postfix 2.8.3
relevant section:
smtpd_milters = unix:/var/smfs/milter-regex.sock
milter_default_action =
I know this is a few days old, but i've been away on holidays
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Andrew Beverley a...@andybev.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 13:25 -0500, Kris Deugau wrote:
Gary Smith wrote:
As already stated, there's not a huge amount that you can do on your
own.
Make sure your PTR and A records match. For every IP address, there should
be a matching PTR record in the in-addr.arpa domain. If a host is
multi-homed, (more than one IP address) make sure that all IP addresses have
a corresponding PTR record (not just the first one).
Apparently, I'm led to
24, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.comwrote:
On 2010-09-22 6:03 PM, Nick Edwards wrote:
By the way, I need to thank you, given your discussion with Timo was one
that had set alarm bells off on this, and the thread with Eddie
confirmed the risks, can't understand
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 09/22/2010 02:22 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:47 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
wrote:
Thanks, we have over the weekend ran
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.netwrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:47 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
wrote:
Thanks, we have over the weekend ran two testbeds at full thrashing
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
On 9/10/2010 00:32, Nick Edwards wrote:
Good day all,
I apologize in advance if the moderators consider this slightly OT.
We have many users moved to a MySQL database, planned for moving away
from Cyrus on Sunday
Good day all,
I apologize in advance if the moderators consider this slightly OT.
We have many users moved to a MySQL database, planned for moving away from
Cyrus on Sunday Oct 3, we are almost ready to go but found a problem with
pop3 software we were going to use.
So basically, using postifx's
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.comwrote:
Nick Edwards put forth on 9/10/2010 2:32 AM:
Before the fans cry foul of why not Dovecot. we have followed the list
thread of what may be a problem with Dovecot its author has identified
but
decided is a tuff
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Nick Edwards:
Another quick question before I depart for work, I understand also (from
that other lists thread) that postfix does not support maildir++ , with
that
curiosity, I googled and found mention
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.comwrote:
On 2010-09-10 5:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Indexes can speed up IMAP performance a decent amount, but they don't
help POP performance at all.
As far as I know, Courier's speed issues
28 matches
Mail list logo
