for this particular IP?
Thanks in advance,
Ray
We are load balancing our Postfix servers and as part of that there is a
connection test to ensure the services are running. So the logs fill with
connection checks. Is there a way to suppress those connections from the logs?
Thanks in advance,
Ray
end
> directly, relay host) configurable via tables?
> Ray:
> > Right now the only thing I am able to do is use dnsmasq and create fake MX
> > records for destination domains. Which works, but It would be nice to have
> > it directly within postfix too, as not to relay
for destination domains. Which works, but It would be nice to have it
directly within postfix too, as not to relay on another piece of software.
Thank you
Best
Ray
--
- Original Message -
> From: "Ray" <r...@toolfactory.net>
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 3:27:01 PM
> Subject: Is it possible to have different systems for sending email (send
> directly, relay host) configu
I was wrong :-). Could you
consider implementing this feature, it would be more convenient than messing
with command filters.
Thank you,
Best
Ray
--
sending DSN to the from (which
could be no-reply, etc.) and sending every DSN (including success) only to a
pre-defined email address .
I hope I did miss something in the documentation,
thank you,
Best
Ray
--
parameter). 2Bounce is really
secondary for me, what I would like is the possibility to also receive the
Success DSN in some parameter defined email.
VERP would handle the bounces, but not the success deliveries, right?
Thanks
Best
Ray
DSNs are sent to the envelope sender, VERP changes the envelope
sender, therefore VERP has effect for all DSNs.
Wietse
OK, I will checkout VERP, sounds exactly like what I would need indeed. My
remaining question would be on how to activate the Success DSN reports?
Best
Ray
--
Hi,
I have a configuration change to make to our postfix relays and I want to
confirm it will work as intended (before I mis-route email for 1,000 people).
I think I have what is a fairly common Postfix environment -
Dual instances -
Instance 1 for inbound - AmavisD, Spamassassin, and some
, it would be a waste of time
to have the milter listen on the internet interface.
Thanks all,
Mike Ray
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 1:26:29 PM
Subject: Re: best approach to filtering one specific case?
Mike Ray:
The basic condition I'm trying to deal with is a message that has
On 18. Sep 2014, at 19:01 Uhr, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Ray Davis:
A customer wants a mail relay for testing to SAP applications. It should
take all relayed email and save it to a local mailbox (or forward it to
another email address) - but it should not actually send
be more than welcome!
Thanks,
Ray
using this account because my postfix gateway can no longer send or receive
mail.
upgraded from v2.10.1 to v2.10.3 this morning.
Since that time, unable to send or receive mail. If anyone can help me debug
this issue, much appreciated.
Errors seen:
Apr 12 14:33:02 portus
not
sure how to fix.
On Saturday, April 12, 2014 2:54 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 02:39:15PM -0700, Edward Ray wrote:
Apr 12 14:33:02 portus postfix/smtpd[10743]: initializing the
server-side TLS engine
Apr 12 14:33:02 portus postfix/master[10667
main.cf looks like this:
virtual_alias_domain=regexp:/etc/postfix/valias
the valias file looks like this:
/ray@ourdomain\.com\.au/ @ourdomain.local
/.*/ mailtest/
mailtest is a local mailbox in the maildir format.
Any help is appreciated. I do not necessary need to use the
virtual-alias-maps
Thanks Viktor.
I managed to get it working...
Not sure why recursive address rewriting is required but it seems to be
working now.
Thanks
Ray
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/regexp-using-virtual-alias-maps-does-not-work-tp64892p64894.html
Sent from
On 19. Aug 2011, at 15:11 Uhr, Wietse Venema wrote:
Ray Davis:
What would cause valid email addresses to be unknown periodically?
They are valid before and after the following log entries and
nothing on the server was changed.
This happens to something like 1-4 emails per day (sometimes 0
On 19. Aug 2011, at 15:56 Uhr, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ray Davis ray-li...@carpe.net:
On 19. Aug 2011, at 15:09 Uhr, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ray Davis ray-li...@carpe.net:
What would cause valid email addresses to be unknown periodically?
They are valid before and after
On 19. Aug 2011, at 16:22 Uhr, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse:
Postfix does not use virtual aliases UNLESS if you configure it to do so.
Please follow instructions in http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
as requested in the mailing list welcome message.
Ray Davis
the second interface as I am already bound to port
25 on all 3 interfaces. I am assuming I am missing something silly here.
Thanks to all in advance.
Ray
### Primary INBound Instance ###
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
alternate_config_directories = /etc/postfix
Hello and sorry for the delay, I wanted to re-examine my logs and assumptions.
On December 21, 2010 03:00:02 pm Wietse Venema wrote:
Ray:
Hello,
I'm having an issue with email just disappearing.
I have been looking at the documentation and logs. I have made the logs
more verbose
On December 23, 2010 10:48:07 am Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/23/2010 11:33 AM, Ray wrote:
I believe that the message is being accepted by Postfix due to lines like
the following in the logs
Dec 23 10:12:20 wserver amavis[15273]: (15273-12) Passed CLEAN,
[70.65.***.***] [70.65.***.***]r
On December 23, 2010 03:00:29 pm Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/23/2010 2:08 PM, Ray wrote:
On December 23, 2010 10:48:07 am Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/23/2010 11:33 AM, Ray wrote:
I believe that the message is being accepted by Postfix due to lines
like the following in the logs
Dec 23 10:12
or documentation on the next stages
of the process. I have done manual pop\smtp transactions over telnet before
and have no problem doing the equivilent, but I need some documentation.
Thanks,
Ray
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:24:03PM +0100, Michael Grimm wrote:
Is there maybe an even more simple approach to this using standard
postfix functionality? The distribution lists are very static and do
not require adjustments very often.
/etc/aliases? :)
Ray
version in CentOS-extras (or
maybe it's centosplus, I forget).
You're other RedHat'ish option would be to rebuild the Fedora 13
SRPM's for CentOS. Could be a bit of a learning curve there though. :)
If possible, just stick with 2.3 unless there's some specific feature
you're missing.
Ray
On July 21, 2009 06:49:09 pm Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Ray wrote:
I have a solution, and It seems to work, just want to know if I'm going
to shoot myself in the foot.
I'm running postfix 2.6 with a number of virtual domains, all data stored
in a MySql database. Server
or is it real?
Thanks for your help.
Ray
was Postfix not
closing
mysql connections back on 08/12/07, and it did help, but it didn't fully
answer my question.
Any help, including links to the docs appreciated.
Ray
Sample log lines:
May 7 13:46:35 wserver postfix/cleanup[27554]: warning: connect to mysql
server localhost: Too many connections
On May 8, 2009 10:31:37 am Wietse Venema wrote:
Ray:
Hello,
System is FreeBSD 7.0, postfix 2.6.2, mysql storage of user info,
amvisd-new, and dovecot for authentication and pop/imap. postconf -n at
end of post.
Just Yesterday I started receiving a lot of
warning: connect to mysql
or
...?
any suggestions including alternate mail lists or google search terms very
much appreciated.
Ray
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
Ray wrote:
Hello,
I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was hoping
that someone here would give me an idea on where to get started.
here's the situation. (Made up names)
server is postfix with amavis-new
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:35:01 Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
Ray r...@stilltech.net wrote:
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
Ray wrote:
Alice (al...@example.com) sends Bob an Email (b...@myserver.com) CC
(b
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:37:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
Ray wrote:
Hello,
I'm having an issue with mail being blocked (I think) and I was
hoping that someone here would give me an idea
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 18:10:22 Bill Weiss wrote:
Ray(r...@stilltech.net)@Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:46:21PM -0700:
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:37:37 /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed March 4 2009 17:26:01 Ray wrote:
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:12:32 Terry Carmen wrote:
Ray wrote
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 17:49:57 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Ray r...@stilltech.net wrote:
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 16:35:01 Magnus Bäck wrote:
On Thursday, March 05, 2009 at 00:26 CET,
Ray r...@stilltech.net wrote:
On Wednesday
a resolution, I'll post back.
Ray
39 matches
Mail list logo
