Hi again Jasper... I think we are in the home straight, but I still
have a couple of questions:-)
On 13/09/2010 12:09 AM, Jasper Jongmans wrote:
On 2010-09-12 17:41, Richard Chapman wrote:
Thanks again Jasper. I have enabled local -v debug logging - and I
think we can see in more
On 13/09/2010 9:35 PM, Jasper Jongmans wrote:
On 2010-09-13 13:03, Richard Chapman wrote:
Hi again Jasper... I think we are in the home straight, but I still
It looks like a virus somewhere - but I'm not sure where. All the
windows boxes here look well protected - but it almost looks like
Hi Victor
On 13/09/2010 10:02 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 01:01:19PM +0800, Richard Chapman wrote:
Thanks to everyone who has helped with this. There are several of you nd
your help is much appreciated.
My recent posting on the trust issue with the google
Hi Jasper
I have found one of the remaining problems - and it isn't postfix
related. See below.
On 13/09/2010 11:39 PM, Richard Chapman wrote:
On 13/09/2010 9:35 PM, Jasper Jongmans wrote:
On 2010-09-13 13:03, Richard Chapman wrote:
Hi again Jasper... I think we are in the home
I think I have found two of the problems. See below.
On 13/09/2010 11:39 PM, Richard Chapman wrote:
On 13/09/2010 9:35 PM, Jasper Jongmans wrote:
On 2010-09-13 13:03, Richard Chapman wrote:
Hi again Jasper... I think we are in the home straight, but I still
It looks like a virus somewhere
Many thanks Victor. I am learning all the time...:-)
Richard.
On 14/09/2010 12:35 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:54:36PM +0800, Richard Chapman wrote:
relayhost = smtp.gmail.com:submission
That should probably be:
relayhost = [smtp.gmail.com]:submission
I
:00 C5 postfix/local[28073]: send attr sender =
Sep 12 23:01:00 C5 postfix/local[2
See also below:
On 12/09/2010 10:13 PM, Jasper Jongmans wrote:
On 2010-09-12 05:53, Richard Chapman wrote:
Hi again Jasper..
I do appreciate your help - but have not solved the problem yet.
Please see below
Hi again Jasper..
I do appreciate your help - but have not solved the problem yet. Please
see below.
On 9/09/2010 11:58 PM, Jasper Jongmans wrote:
On 2010-09-09 17:29, Richard Chapman wrote:
I have been doing address masquerading - and thought that only
applied to sender addresses. After
OK. I'm making some progress here:
After attempting a sasl/tls connection to smtp.gmail.com I get the
following in the logs:
Sep 10 17:12:32 C5 postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system
Sep 10 17:12:32 C5 postfix/master[20209]: daemon started -- version 2.3.3,
configuration
Thanks to everyone who has helped with this. There are several of you
nd your help is much appreciated.
My recent posting on the trust issue with the google certificates is
not sorted - but is a red herring as far as this issue is concerned.
I think I have it sorted - or at least working so
I'm not suer whether this is the correct place to report this - but if
not please advise:
In the document:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
In the section entitled:
Postfix SMTP/LMTP client policy - SASL mechanism /properties/
and the subsection:
Encrypted SMTP
postfix 2.3.3 under centos 5.5
I have had this postfix server running fine for ages with:
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, $mydomain
With this setting it receives mail addressed to
validu...@aardvark.com.au and validu...@c5.aardvark.com.au.
I want to restrict this server to
Thanks for your incredibly useful advice Victor... May I ask some
follow up questions?..
On 7/09/2010 10:06 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:53:13PM +0800, Richard Chapman wrote:
I am running postfix 2.3.3 as part of Centos 5.5.
I am trying to set up a hybrid mail
I am running postfix 2.3.3 as part of Centos 5.5.
I am trying to set up a hybrid mail system which involves postfix,
dovecot and Google Apps.
Ideally - I would like the email clients to use a authenticated TLS
connection to postifix (which is working fine) and then postfix to relay
the mail
14 matches
Mail list logo
