The upgrade to 3.1 was uneventful. I noticed you don't need to select an option
for Dovecot.
Nice work.
As an FYI, I ran the online DROWN test without blocking SSLv2 but using the
updated openssl. No DROWN issue detected.
Apologies for the top post due to use of a smartphone.
Original
I hate to bug you gurus, but can you guys mention which config file parameters
go in, that is main or master. I simply don't know postfix that well, and
RTFMing requires knowing which document to read.
I've been hesitant to upgrade to postfix 3 given that everything is working on
2.11, but the
Sorry about the top posting, but I'm on my phone.
Is this supposed to be 2 and 3 also rather than 20 and 30?
in master.cf submission and smtps
-o smtpd_soft_error=20
-o smtpd_hard_error=30
Original Message
From: Benny Pedersen
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 4:13 AM
To:
Actually I have a xyz domain that mirrors my com domain. I use it for test
purposes.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Sebastian Nielsen
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 3:53 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: SV: SV: Blocking TLDs
1: REJECT tells the
Regarding Spamhaus, I am periodically blacklisted on my hosted Web service
provider because somebody sets up an account on the same service, then spews
spam. Because I share the same IP, I'm declared toxic.
I have set up a VPS, which of course has its own IP, not to get in this boat.
But I
If wishes were horses. ;-)
My xyz domain is on the VPS. I'm going to switch systems in a few days.
Original Message
From: Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 2:45 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Reply To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Feedback on Postscreen Whitelist
FWIW, I have the same problem. I saw it as intermittent, but now that you
tracked it down to the width of the lines , this makes sense. I do have access
to my server console at the moment, but I'm running the highest rev of postfix
2. I believe it is rev 11.
So is this problem present in
I get the body hash failure on plain text.
Original Message
From: Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 10:24 AM
To: Postfix users
Reply To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: DKIM Signature fails
Andy A:
>Following is the original message which?fails?the DKIM verification
>at the
Ignore my comment. I was thinking s/mime. Sorry about that.
Original Message
From: Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 12:33 PM
To: Postfix users
Reply To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: DKIM Signature fails
yahoogro...@lazygranch.xyz:
> I get the body hash failure on plain text.
FWIW, I keep an xyz tld for test purposes. Point dot com to production and dot
xyz for test. Yes I know there are ways to do this with a subdomain, but dot
xyz is really cheap.
I never investigated if there production users of xyz.
Original Message
From: Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Monday,
http://disablessl3.com/
When I ran a series of email server checks, I was surprised that one claimed to
disable ssl3 to avoid the poodle hack. Seems very unlikely to me. Anyway, the
link above does suggest doing that.
Original Message
From: Alice Wonder
Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015
Note that Domain Keys is not the same as DKIM. DKIM supercedes Domain Keys.
http://support2.constantcontact.com/articles/FAQ/2213
I'm no guru on this, so correct away if I'm wrong.
I can pass DKIM, but not Domain Keys. I don't know if it is possible to pass
both tests in one implementation,
12 matches
Mail list logo
