On 11/12/2013 2:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Noel Jones:
>> On 11/12/2013 10:45 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>>> As for 'fixing' Postfix recipient address validation, doing a
>>> half-assed job that handles only @domain->@domain and other 1-1
>>> canonical/virtual alias mappings may not be hard, bu
Noel Jones:
> On 11/12/2013 10:45 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > As for 'fixing' Postfix recipient address validation, doing a
> > half-assed job that handles only @domain->@domain and other 1-1
> > canonical/virtual alias mappings may not be hard, but doing a
> > complete job would require a rede
On 11/12/2013 10:45 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> As for 'fixing' Postfix recipient address validation, doing a
> half-assed job that handles only @domain->@domain and other 1-1
> canonical/virtual alias mappings may not be hard, but doing a
> complete job would require a redesign.
>
> Wietse
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:45:51AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> /dev/rob0:
> > As Viktor said, while a domain aliasing feature might be
> > worth considering for an eventual Postfix 3.0, it's probably
> > not worth implementing here in Postfix 2.x. Maybe a few
> > examples added to VIRTUAL_README?
/dev/rob0:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 03:59:11PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > On 2013-11-11 2:30 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> > wrote:
> > >It is not entirely unreasonable to expect address validation
> > >to handle 1-to-1 aliasing of @example.org with @example.net.
> >
> > Postfixadmin, an excell
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 03:59:11PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2013-11-11 2:30 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
> >It is not entirely unreasonable to expect address validation
> >to handle 1-to-1 aliasing of @example.org with @example.net.
>
> Postfixadmin, an excellent tool for managing use
helpful.
Kind regards,
Christoph
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Charles Marcus
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 9:59 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Catch-all virtual alias
On 2013-11-11 2:30 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
On 2013-11-11 2:30 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
It is not entirely unreasonable to expect address validation to handle
1-to-1 aliasing of @example.org with @example.net.
Postfixadmin, an excellent tool for managing userdbs in
mysql/postgresql, has had 1-to-1 domain aliasing for a long time, and
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 07:18:01PM +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> > I consider this a bug, not a feature. Neither the manual for
> > virtual_mailbox_maps nor the one for virtual_alias_maps says that the
> > restriction from virtual_mailbox_maps is being ignored if there is a
> > valid virtual_ali
On 2013-11-11 Christoph Kling wrote:
>> User mappings, including catch-alls, should go into the respective
>> map. In case of virtual mailboxes you must map the catch-all to an
>> existing mailbox in $virtual_mailbox_maps, e.g.:
>>
>> f...@example.net example.net/foo
>> b...@example.net example.
Dear Ansgar and everybody else,
in short: I think postfix' behavior reflects a bug, not a feature.
Please, read again my first email. I hope to make it clear with the
following remarks:
> $virtual_mailbox_domains lists *domains*, so its content should look
like
> this:
>
> example.net
I am sor
On 2013-11-10 Christoph Kling wrote:
> virtual_alias_domains =
>
> virtual_alias_maps = hash file with contents:
> "@domain @anotherdomain"
>
> virtual_mailbox_domains = hash file with contents:
> "@anotherdomain"
>
> virtual_mailbox_maps = hash file with contents:
> "foo@anotherdomain"
$virtu
Hello,
I experience undesired strange of Postfix 2.10.2 using the following
configuration:
--
virtual_alias_domains =
virtual_alias_maps = hash file with contents:
"@domain @anotherdomain"
virtual_mailbox_domains = hash file with contents:
"@anotherdomain"
virtual_mailbox_maps = hash file wit
13 matches
Mail list logo
