All clear ! thanks.
On Friday, March 17, 2017 5:19 PM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
* chaouche yacine 2017.03.17 14:52:
> Thank you Thomas, so if I understand correctly in Viktor's config dovecot is
> only used by postfix as a backend to query
* chaouche yacine 2017.03.17 14:52:
> Thank you Thomas, so if I understand correctly in Viktor's config dovecot is
> only used by postfix as a backend to query for valid virtual email addresses ?
Hi Yassine,
one of the benefits of using Dovecot's MDAs besides Sieve,
> On Mar 17, 2017, at 9:52 AM, chaouche yacine wrote:
>
> Thank you Thomas, so if I understand correctly in Viktor's config dovecot is
> only used by postfix as a backend to query for valid virtual email addresses ?
Dovecot is used as an IMAP server. Postfix does
Thank you Thomas, so if I understand correctly in Viktor's config dovecot is
only used by postfix as a backend to query for valid virtual email addresses ?
* chaouche yacine 2017.03.17 10:25:
> > Or similar, yes. I have:
> >
> >userdb {
> >args = uid=500 gid=500 home=/var/spool/virtual
> > mail=maildir:/var/spool/virtual/%n
> >driver = static
> >}
>
>
> Sorry for asking this on a postfix list but Viktor
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 4:09 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>> The problem is then getting dovecot to understand what to do with that
>> fully qualified user once it gets it. For my case, since the 'user' that
>> postfix is mapping to is the same as the local Unix
On Thu, 3/16/17, Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
Subject: Re: Problems with lmtp
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Thursday, March 16, 2017, 8:08 AM
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at
08:56:20AM +, Doug
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:56:20AM +, Doug wrote:
> > > $ postconf -d mail_version
> > >
> > > Yes, 3.1.0, thank you.
> >
> > Cool. I would expect that this likely contains backports of later
> > patches, but unfortunately the Linux distros tend to avoid backporting
> >
On March 16, 2017 1:15:54 AM EDT, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:02:58AM +, Doug wrote:
>
>> $ postconf -d mail_version
>>
>> Yes, 3.1.0, thank you.
>
>Cool. I would expect that this likely contains backports of later
>patches, but
ct: Re: Problems with lmtp
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2017, 10:15 PM
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at
04:02:58AM +, Doug wrote:
> $ postconf -d mail_version
>
> Yes, 3.1.0, thank you.
Cool. I would expect that this likely contains backports of
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:02:58AM +, Doug wrote:
> $ postconf -d mail_version
>
> Yes, 3.1.0, thank you.
Cool. I would expect that this likely contains backports of later
patches, but unfortunately the Linux distros tend to avoid backporting
upstream version number updates, so it
[ apologies to everyone for the formatting below, the Yahoo! webmail client is
simply awful ]
On Wed, 3/15/17, Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
Subject: Re: Problems with lmtp
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Wednesday,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 02:06:37AM +, Doug wrote:
> [ Trying this again as I think I sent to the wrong address the first time ]
FWIW, it got through both times.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 02:01:07AM +, Doug wrote:
> I'm on Ubuntu Server 16.04 (up to date) and using the stock postfix
[ Trying this again as I think I sent to the wrong address the first time ]
Greetings,
First I'd like to say thank you to all of the developers and contributors to
Postfix. I've used it for many years with great success and happiness. :)
I'm on Ubuntu Server 16.04 (up to date) and using the
Hi-
We upgraded to a much newer version of Postfix, and have one stubborn
problem I can't seem to fix. Any help would be much appreciated.
RedHat Linux ES4
Were using RH's postfix: postfix-2.2.10-1.2.1.el4_7
Downloaded source for 2.7.2. Built, and did a make upgrade.
Everything appears to
Steve Cooper:
8A30B52465235124 Thu Jan 6 11:08:31 g...@wti.com
(conversation with opus.allegro.com[10.84.2.10] timed out while
sending end of data -- message may be sent more than once)
o...@allegro.com
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:41:28AM -0800, Steve Cooper wrote:
Here's the line from our trans.exp file:
/^om_.*/ lmtp:inet:opus.allegro.com:24
And, the corresponding line in main.cf:
transport_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/trans.exp
This all worked fine with the old
17 matches
Mail list logo