Hi, there. The problem has solved by itself or maybe the ISP has made a
change or an improvement due to my request after you captured that the problem
is the "router or upstream". Thank you for your great support, and sparing me
your valuable time.
Engin YILMAZ
* Stan Hoeppner [2012-07-30 14:35]:
> On 7/29/2012 6:57 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
>
> > Actually it is not router. It is only BPL modem. After Static IP hiring the
> > ISP send me an email how to configure the server with this IP addresses
> > information. The 10.138.9.201 internal IP address sele
Am 31.07.2012 21:50, schrieb Engin qwert:
>> Unfortunately there is no English option on their website so I'm unable
>> to locate and read their terms of service document. You will need to do
>> so. You're looking for a clause WRT hosting a mail server/web server on
>> your broadband circuit. You
> Unfortunately there is no English option on their website so I'm unable
> to locate and read their terms of service document. You will need to do
> so. You're looking for a clause WRT hosting a mail server/web server on
> your broadband circuit. You are broadband yes? Your server is not
> co
On 7/31/2012 4:12 AM, Engin qwert wrote:
>
>
>> Engin what country are you in? Who is your ISP?
> I am living in Turkey, Istanbul Tuzla. and my ISP is Metronet. (Sorry for
> shutting downing the server since last post.)
> I also want to re send the IP information that is relevant to situation.
>
On 31/07/2012 10:12, Engin qwert wrote:
> Engin what country are you in? Who is your ISP?
I am living in Turkey, Istanbul Tuzla. and my *ISP is Metronet*.
(Sorry for shutting downing the server since last post.)
I also want to re send the IP information that is relevant to situation.
Externa
> Engin what country are you in? Who is your ISP?
I am living in Turkey, Istanbul Tuzla. and my ISP is Metronet. (Sorry for
shutting downing the server since last post.)
I also want to re send the IP information that is relevant to situation.
External İp adress : 31.44.198.247Lan İp adress
On 7/30/2012 8:19 AM, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
> On 07/30/2012 03:34 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Engin what country are you in? Who is your ISP?
>
> Stan, *whois* your friend:
>
> netname: MTRNT-NET
> descr: Metronet Iletisim Teknoloji A.S.
> country: TR
>
> TR stands
Den 2012-07-30 14:34, Stan Hoeppner skrev:
Eingin, once you give us the ISP name we should be able to quickly
find
the TOS and know whether or not they allow you to host your own
outbound
mail server. Assuming the web site is in a language one of us
speaks.
I'm English only.
if this is the
On 07/30/2012 03:34 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Engin what country are you in? Who is your ISP?
Stan, *whois* your friend:
netname: MTRNT-NET
descr: Metronet Iletisim Teknoloji A.S.
country: TR
TR stands for Turkey. Domain registered for Engim Yılmaz from Istanbul.
I'm
On 7/29/2012 6:57 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
> Actually it is not router. It is only BPL modem. After Static IP hiring the
> ISP send me an email how to configure the server with this IP addresses
> information. The 10.138.9.201 internal IP address selection was not made by
> myself.
Engin what co
Den 2012-07-30 01:57, Engin qwert skrev:
Actually it is not router. It is only BPL modem. After Static IP
hiring the ISP send me an email how to configure the server with this
IP addresses information. The 10.138.9.201 internal IP address
selection was not made by myself.
ask isp if this shit
Den 2012-07-30 01:49, Engin qwert skrev:
I think my ISP won't care my situation. Changing it may be better.
ask for a better router ?
or just ignore there problem and run your own router with linux
But now I 've left with configuration that even cannot send mail even
outside the network :(
Den 2012-07-30 01:46, Reindl Harald skrev:
The internal IP address of the Server PC: 10.138.9.201
says there is a NAT-router in front of your box
so the wan ip is ?, add proxyhost in main.cf now
Den 2012-07-30 01:36, Reindl Harald skrev:
no, so call your ISP and scream loud in the phone
or just ask for there relayhostname, so if there users is spamming
wild, there ip ends up in global blacklists :)
Den 2012-07-30 00:43, Engin qwert skrev:
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# telnet 168.100.189.2 25
Trying 168.100.189.2...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
firewalled ?
netstat -nr
ip route show
ip addr show
if more help is needed
Den 2012-07-30 00:20, Wietse Venema skrev:
Confirmed. Inbound SMTP connectivity appears to work. You may need
a network sniffer to find out why outbound SMTP fails.
are syslog not working ?
>What output do you get from the command
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# telnet 10.138.9.254 25 Trying 10.138.9.254...telnet:
Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
> call it how you like
>
> it is a device making NAt because you machines address is
> a local one and not your public and if this thing has a
> however broken setup it may be the root-cause
>
Ok. Sorry for my weak knowledge. The modem is actually provided by the ISP in
this situation modem or
On 30/07/2012 01:02, Engin qwert wrote:
> Does your ISP provide you with a mail gateway address to use ?
>
>
They did'nt informed me such an aspect. But I don't think they will.
They are still claiming that they are not blocking any port so in this
point of view they would not give any gateway
Am 30.07.2012 01:57, schrieb Engin qwert:
>
>> before you insist make sure that you are allowed to
>> run a server and that your NAT-gateway is not broken
>>
>> > The internal IP address of the Server PC: 10.138.9.201
>>
>> says there is a NAT-router in front of your box
>>
>>
>
> Actually it
> Does your ISP provide you with a mail gateway address to use ?
>
>They did'nt informed me such an aspect. But I don't think they will. They are
>still claiming that they are not blocking any port so in this point of view
>they would not give any gateway address I believe.
I think my ISP won't care my situation. Changing it may be better.
But now I 've left with configuration that even cannot send mail even
outside the network :(
Does your ISP provide you with a mail gateway address to use ?
> before you insist make sure that you are allowed to
> run a server and that your NAT-gateway is not broken
>
> > The internal IP address of the Server PC: 10.138.9.201
>
> says there is a NAT-router in front of your box
>
>
Actually it is not router. It is only BPL modem. After Static IP
>
> as said a month ago
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Betreff: Re: "no route to host" error message
> Datum: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:58:06 +0200
> Von: Reindl Harald
> Organisation: the lounge interactive design
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
&
Reindl Harald:
> before you insist make sure that you are allowed to
> run a server and that your NAT-gateway is not broken
>
> > The internal IP address of the Server PC: 10.138.9.201
>
> says there is a NAT-router in front of your box
Reindl has a good point. If the NAT router maps only inboun
ISP is blocking port 25. This way I can
> insist that they are blocking port 25. Due
> to my weak knowledge I had to accept what they claimed that it is not
> blocked.
>
>> Subject: Re: no route to host
>> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Date: Sun, 29
Thank you all clarifiyng that my ISP is blocking port 25. This way I can insist
that they are blocking port 25. Due to my weak knowledge I had to accept what
they claimed that it is not blocked.
> Subject: Re: no route to host
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012
as said a month ago
Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: "no route to host" error message
Datum: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:58:06 +0200
Von: Reindl Harald
Organisation: the lounge interactive design
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
BOAH DO NOT SWITCH TO TOP-POSTING
Am 13.07.
Engin qwert:
> root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# telnet 168.100.189.2 25Trying
> 168.100.189.2...telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
Then your ISP is blocking your outbound SMTP connections.
I was able to connect to your server's SMTP port from 168.100.189.2
(you should see that
-
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:13:55 +0100
> From: p...@netpresto.co.uk
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: 回覆： Re: no route to host
>
> In my opinion TCP port 25 (smtp) is being blocked by either
> your router or the upstream provider
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nting to server) > Mail Server > The mail sent.
but ;
Mail Server (Icedove program pointing to itself) > Cannot send mail (the error
message were "no route to the host")
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:13:55 +0100
From: p...@netpresto.co.uk
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: 回
-
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100
> From: p...@netpresto.co.uk <mailto:p...@netpresto.co.uk>
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org>
> Subject: Re: 回覆： Re: no route to host
>
> What is the output from the command
>
> traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2
>
-
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100
> From: p...@netpresto.co.uk <mailto:p...@netpresto.co.uk>
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org <mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org>
> Subject: Re: 回覆： Re: no route to host
>
> What is the output from the command
>
> traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2
>
@postfix.org
Subject: Re: 回覆： Re: no route to host
And now
traceroute -T -p 80 168.100.189.2
and
traceroute -T -p 587 168.100.189.2
On 29/07/2012 23:57, Engin qwert wrote:
root@xn
138.9.254) 39.993 ms !X * *
>
>
>
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:55:06 +0100
> From: p...@netpresto.co.uk
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: 回覆： Re: no route to host
>
> What is the output from
： Re: no route to host
What is the output from the command
traceroute -T -p 25 168.100.189.2
On 29/07/2012 23:47, Engin qwert wrote:
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# nslookup hotmail.com
Server
Address: 65.55.72.167
> Name:hotmail.com
> Address: 65.55.72.183
> Name:hotmail.com
> Address: 65.55.72.135
> Name:hotmail.com
> Address: 65.55.72.151
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:25:53 +0800
> > Subject: 回覆： Re: no route to host
> > From: little...@tcssh.tc.edu.tw
I commented the line you told. It did'nt changed the result.
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:29:54 +0800
> Subject: 回覆： Re: no route to host
> From: little...@tcssh.tc.edu.tw
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org; mjw...@kapu.net
>
> Just comment the transport field and reload
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:25:53 +0800
> Subject: 回覆： Re: no route to host
> From: little...@tcssh.tc.edu.tw
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org; mjw...@kapu.net
>
> Hi there,
>
>Could you please tried to use the command "nslookup" or "dig" to get the
&
If the problem cannot resolved I will re run the echp script. It may solve the
mysql problem.
> Subject: Re: no route to host
> From: mjw...@kapu.net
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:25:27 -0700
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>
>
> On Jul 29, 2012, at 2:13
root@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~# telnet 168.100.189.2 25Trying
168.100.189.2...telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
> Subject: Re: no route to host
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:30:20 -0400
> From: wie...@porcupine.org
>
> Engin
origin.sn134w.snt134.mail.live.com (65.55.72.183):PORT STATESERVICE25/tcp
filtered smtp
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.97
seconds---
> Subject: Re: no route to host
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:20
Engin qwert:
> Yes, I can receive mails :) I also want to add an additional information
> that. "On the server machine I can reach the internet. (web browsing, can
> ping hotmail etc.)"
>
What happens when you type this command on the server with the problem:
telnet 168.100.189.2 25
That
Just comment the transport field and reload your postfix before you are going
to re-do the test!
LittleCho@My Xperia
Michael J Wise 提到：
>
>On Jul 29, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
>
>> transport_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_transports.cf
>
>… any from other logs, yer My
Hi there,
Could you please tried to use the command "nslookup" or "dig" to get the
mail handlers and then use "telnet" to test one of the mail handlers at port
25? I think it os necessary to check whether the problem is happening as a mail
routing issue or a host routing issue. Also,please c
On Jul 29, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
> transport_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_transports.cf
… any from other logs, yer MySQL is pooched in some way.
I think I see the problem.
I have no idea how to fix it, sorry.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
"Please have your Internet Licens
Yes, I can receive mails :) I also want to add an additional information that.
"On the server machine I can reach the internet. (web browsing, can ping
hotmail etc.)"
> Subject: Re: no route to host
> From: mjw...@kapu.net
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:08:25 -0700
Michael J Wise:
>
> On Jul 29, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
>
> > Hello, sorry for sending too many information which may be irrelevant but
> > I want to post anything I think it causes the problem.
>
> 220 xn--hadibakalm-5ub ESMTP Postfix powered by Easy Hosting Control Panel
> (ehcp
On Jul 29, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
> Hello, sorry for sending too many information which may be irrelevant but I
> want to post anything I think it causes the problem.
220 xn--hadibakalm-5ub ESMTP Postfix powered by Easy Hosting Control Panel
(ehcp) on Ubuntu, www.ehcp.net
Well,
898884: to=,
relay=none, delay=6920, delays=6907/0.04/13/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred
(connect to mx4.hotmail.com[65.55.92.168]:25: No route to
host)-------------
> Subject: Re: no route to host
> From: mjw...@kapu.net
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 20
On Jul 29, 2012, at 1:32 PM, Engin qwert wrote:
> But the new installation suffers the same problem, I cannot send mail ( no
> route to host error).
That means … that the server is attempting to get to a host IP address that
doesn't exist.
Somehow, I suspect this isn't as such a Postfix proble
l_uid_maps =
static:5000---
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 22:53:25 +0200
> From: h.rei...@thelounge.net
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: no route to host
>
>
>
> Am 29.07.2012 22:32, schrieb Engin qwert:
> > Hello
Den 2012-07-29 22:32, Engin qwert skrev:
The ISP still claims they are not blocking any port. Any help would
be
apprecriated. Thanks :)
show postconf -n to resolve this problem if you belive postfix users
care of no spam to maillist with no route to host :=)
you already reinstalled debian,
Am 29.07.2012 22:32, schrieb Engin qwert:
> Hello again. About one month later I decided to make a clean Debian 6
> install. This time I did'nt do much
> modification to the system. Only installed OS and ehcp control panel.
>
> But the new installation suffers the same problem, I cannot send ma
Am 17.07.2012 19:08, schrieb Alvin Wong:
> [Forgot to reply all, resend]
>
> No route to host means your IP cannot reach the remote IP, not port
> related.
that is not really true
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m multiport --destination-port 25 -j REJECT
--reject-with icmp-host-unreachable
i still
From: eng...@hotmail.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: "no route to host" error message
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:33:40 +
Sorry for asking everything but I want to make sure there isn't any rejection.
I run the command you told me. To my weak understan
BOAH DO NOT SWITCH TO TOP-POSTING
Am 13.07.2012 16:33, schrieb Engin qwert:
> --
>> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:25:54 +0200
>> From: h.rei...@thelounge.net
>> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Subject: Re: "no route to host" error message
>>
> From: h.rei...@thelounge.net
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: "no route to host" error message
>
>
>
> Am 13.07.2012 16:20, schrieb Engin qwert:
> > Hello and sorry for asking again.
> >
> > I telnet'ted the hotmail.com from both
Am 13.07.2012 16:20, schrieb Engin qwert:
> Hello and sorry for asking again.
>
> I telnet'ted the hotmail.com from both port 25 and port 587 when I telnet
> directly from server or any other
> location in Istanbul
> --
> engin@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~$ telnet hotmail.com 25
> Trying 65.
lients of the mail server
could both Pop3 and SMTP successfully but the local machine itself cannot send
mail but could Pop3.
> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:49:50 +0100
> From: dun...@presidium.org
> To: h.rei...@thelounge.net
> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: "no route
machine itself cannot send
mail but could Pop3.
> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:49:50 +0100
> From: dun...@presidium.org
> To: h.rei...@thelounge.net
> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: "no route to host" error message
>
>
> On Fri
Am 13.07.2012 12:49, schrieb Duncan B.:
> You're not on a RedStation dedicated server are you, per-chance? The reason
> I ask, is that I encountered this
> exact error yesterday and investigating into it with a tcpdump, showed
> RedStation's gateway was filtering SMTP
> connections, forcing it
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
--
679D8120710 611 Fri Jul 13 12:34:05 some_sender@some_domain.tld
(connect to mx2.hotmail.com[65.55.92.184]:25: No route to host)
some_receip...@hotmail.com
--
thi
elounge.net
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: "no route to host" error message
>
>
>
> Am 13.07.2012 12:39, schrieb Engin qwert:
> > Hello, I set my postfix server using a ready made shell script. The Mail
> > server is working as excepted excep
Am 13.07.2012 12:39, schrieb Engin qwert:
> Hello, I set my postfix server using a ready made shell script. The Mail
> server is working as excepted except the
> localhost it self. So the Mail Server can not send mail using Icedove, Telnet
> nor PHP' mail () function. When I run
> "mailq" comma
66 matches
Mail list logo
