Vidar Salberg Normann:
> Does this mean you can't make postfix treat traffic on port 587 exactly like
> normal SMTP traffic on port 25, while also accepting SASL and/or AUTH
> LOGIN if used?
The only difference between 25 and 587 is in the Postfix master.cf file.
Wietse
Vidar Salberg Normann a écrit :
>>> My ISP, ATT blocks port 25. I think if I just send the email to port 587
>>> ( which is how I've configured Thunderbird ) this should work.
>> On 587, you will also need SASL authentication. This is a "submission"
>> service.
>
> Does this mean you can't make po
Le Fri 26/12/2008, mouss disait
>
> it's not required. but if you don't verify the cert, then you trust DNS.
> so a DNS attack (poisoning, ...) would make him send passwords to the
> wrong server.
But if you want to verify the cert the standard way of trusting any CA just
because it appears in th
>> My ISP, ATT blocks port 25. I think if I just send the email to port 587
>> ( which is how I've configured Thunderbird ) this should work.
>
> On 587, you will also need SASL authentication. This is a "submission"
> service.
Does this mean you can't make postfix treat traffic on port 587 exactl
Jan P. Kessler a écrit :
> mouss schrieb:
>> it's not required. but if you don't verify the cert, then you trust DNS.
>> so a DNS attack (poisoning, ...) would make him send passwords to the
>> wrong server.
>>
>
>
> If you use encryption you implicitly assume that there might be someone
> bet
mouss schrieb:
it's not required. but if you don't verify the cert, then you trust DNS.
so a DNS attack (poisoning, ...) would make him send passwords to the
wrong server.
If you use encryption you implicitly assume that there might be someone
between you and the target system. Unfortunate
Sahil Tandon a écrit :
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 08:25:12AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>
>>> sean darcy wrote:
>>>
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:08:20PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>
>> smtp_use_tls = yes
>>
> This is obsolet
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 08:25:12AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> > sean darcy wrote:
> >
> > > Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:08:20PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> smtp_use_tls = yes
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> This is obsolete. Set:
> > >>
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 08:25:12AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> sean darcy wrote:
>
> > Victor Duchovni wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:08:20PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> >>
> >>> smtp_use_tls = yes
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is obsolete. Set:
> >>
> >>smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
> >>
Sahil Tandon wrote:
sean darcy wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:08:20PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
smtp_use_tls = yes
This is obsolete. Set:
smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
or better (given suitable CAfile or CApath):
smtp_tls_security_level = sec
sean darcy wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:08:20PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>>
>>> smtp_use_tls = yes
>>>
>>
>> This is obsolete. Set:
>>
>> smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
>>
>> or better (given suitable CAfile or CApath):
>>
>> smtp_tls_security_level =
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:08:20PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
smtp_use_tls = yes
This is obsolete. Set:
smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
or better (given suitable CAfile or CApath):
smtp_tls_security_level = secure
So where would you get the certif
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:08:20PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> smtp_use_tls = yes
>
This is obsolete. Set:
smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
or better (given suitable CAfile or CApath):
smtp_tls_security_level = secure
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 7:02 PM, sean darcy wrote:
> I've have an asterisk voip server that receives faxes and converts them to
> pdf. What I then want to do is email the pdf's to my two mailboxes - one on
> 1and1.com, the other on gmail.
>
> My ISP, ATT blocks port 25. I think if I just send the
sean darcy wrote:
"postmap the transports file"?
as in
postmap /etc/postfix/transports ??
Yes
and reload postfix's configuration.
service postfix restart ??
Sure, or 'postfix reload', unless stated otherwise.
How do I set up postfix to provide SASL authentication
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 07:02:17PM -0500, sean darcy wrote:
>
>> I've have an asterisk voip server that receives faxes and converts them
>> to pdf. What I then want to do is email the pdf's to my two mailboxes -
>> one on 1and1.com, the ot
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 07:02:17PM -0500, sean darcy wrote:
> I've have an asterisk voip server that receives faxes and converts them
> to pdf. What I then want to do is email the pdf's to my two mailboxes -
> one on 1and1.com, the other on gmail.
>
> My ISP, ATT blocks port 25. I think if I ju
sean darcy wrote:
I've have an asterisk voip server that receives faxes and converts them
to pdf. What I then want to do is email the pdf's to my two mailboxes -
one on 1and1.com, the other on gmail.
My ISP, ATT blocks port 25. I think if I just send the email to port 587
( which is how I've
I've have an asterisk voip server that receives faxes and converts them
to pdf. What I then want to do is email the pdf's to my two mailboxes -
one on 1and1.com, the other on gmail.
My ISP, ATT blocks port 25. I think if I just send the email to port 587
( which is how I've configured Thunderb
19 matches
Mail list logo
