Hi there,
I thought this is a Postfix setting. Postfix 2.3.3.
Say, my postfix server manages domain1 and domain2. If I send a message
to X@domain1 and Y@domain2. Right now I get two separate messages (both
identical), how can I get just one single message for ALL domains?
Thanks
Yan
Co
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:03:53PM -0400, Zhou, Yan wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I thought this is a Postfix setting. Postfix 2.3.3.
>
> Say, my postfix server manages domain1 and domain2. If I send a message
> to X@domain1 and Y@domain2. Right now I get two separate messages (both
> identical), h
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 3:09 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: setting for one single message with multiple domain
On 2011-07-21 21:08, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:03:53PM -0400, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
I thought this is a Postfix setting. Postfix 2.3.3.
Say, my postfix server manages domain1 and domain2. If I send a message
to X@domain1 and Y@domain2. Right now I get two separ
On 2011-07-21 21:39, Zhou, Yan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 3:09 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: setting for one single message with
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:39:19PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> For mail others send, you can't. For mail you send, if it is important
>> (I would suggest not), configure the same transport:nexthop for both
>> domains:
>>
>> example.com smtp:example.com
>> example.net smtp:exa
On 2011-07-21 21:47, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:39:19PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
For mail others send, you can't. For mail you send, if it is important
(I would suggest not), configure the same transport:nexthop for both
domains:
example.com smtp:example.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:00:35PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> It is useful, when you want envelopes with recipient in both domains
>> to be handled in a single transaction with the target nexthop, rather
>> than a separate transaction for each domain (default).
>
> I understood that part, but
On 2011-07-21 22:02, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:00:35PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
It is useful, when you want envelopes with recipient in both domains
to be handled in a single transaction with the target nexthop, rather
than a separate transaction for each domain (def
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> Now my application is connecting to a local Postfix, which then relays
> to the same remote Postfix.
>
> *Now this same remote Postfix is delivering two messages.*
> -
>
>
> He needs to configure domain-dependent transports on t
Victor Duchovni:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:00:35PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>
> >> It is useful, when you want envelopes with recipient in both domains
> >> to be handled in a single transaction with the target nexthop, rather
> >> than a separate transaction for each domain (default).
> >
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:27:00PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The alternative would require what is called MX piggy-backing, where
> the MTA looks up the MX records for all the recipients of a message,
> and sorts the recipients by the MX IP address (instead of the
> next-hop domain name like P
On 2011-07-21 22:23, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Now my application is connecting to a local Postfix, which then relays
to the same remote Postfix.
*Now this same remote Postfix is delivering two messages.*
-
He needs to configur
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:10:31PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> Ah - does setting a relayhost= not make that a single destination, then ?
Sure, if all remote mail goes to the same place. Anything that causes
the domains in question to resolve to the same transport:nexthop.
--
Viktor.
On 2011-07-21 23:14, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:10:31PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Ah - does setting a relayhost= not make that a single destination, then ?
Sure, if all remote mail goes to the same place. Anything that causes
the domains in question to resolve to the
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:19:16PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-07-21 23:14, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:10:31PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>>
>>> Ah - does setting a relayhost= not make that a single destination, then ?
>> Sure, if all remote mail goes to the
16 matches
Mail list logo
