Hi L.,
Like many folks - I get some long digests. W/ ver. 4.2 is it no longer
possible to search within a specified message skip to where that word
or string appears in the message? I thought it was possible in previous
version, but maybe my memory is foggy.
Look at 'Find in Current
hi all.
Like many folks - I get some long digests. W/ ver. 4.2 is it no longer
possible to search within a specified message skip to where that word
or string appears in the message? I thought it was possible in previous
version, but maybe my memory is foggy.
thanks
I can verify that auto-forwarding a message caused the message count to
go off track.Hope this helps;
Rick
--
G4/500 (DP) :: 768 MB RAM :: 10.2.6 :: PM 4.2 :: 3 pane mode
--
Original message:
Received from PowerMail info on 11/9/03 at 6:37 pm
If you any of you have fail-safe method
Ben Kennedy / 9/12/03 / 11:47 AM wrote:
I've just (like yesterday) received my brand new MOTU 828mkII and am duly
impressed thus far. :) Finally, no more need for OS 9.
This is getting off-topic, but since Wayne is also a DP user, be aware
that DP4.x on a single proc machine especially TiBook
On 12 9 2003 at 11:41 am -0400, Wayne Brissette wrote:
The sad part of this is I am in the same situation with my music
software/hardware
Which is that?
I've just (like yesterday) received my brand new MOTU 828mkII and am duly
impressed thus far. :) Finally, no more need for OS 9.
-b
--
A-NO-NE Music [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Friday, September 12, 2003 stated:
My setup won't allow me to go 100% OSX. Here is an expensive piece of
equipment which is the hart of my studio, MOTU Digital Time Piece. It's
a serial device which does not allow USB-Serial adaptor, and which
provide various
Scott at HobbyLink Japan / 9/12/03 / 10:11 PM wrote:
My vote is to do just that: Go Cocoa, and forget development for OS 8-9.
CTM can leave those versions around for people who want them, but they
should not invest any more resources into them.
Well, the main reason I switched to PM from
On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 10:02 AM, Janusz Buda wrote:
Let me see -- I replaced both application and scripts, allowed
SpamSieve
to update the corpus, then reset it. I then imported some seed spam and
retrained with a few dozen good/bad messages to the corpus.
I think that's the
Scott at HobbyLink:
Not only that, but Michael Tsai is actively developing the program,
and very responsive.
not long after...
Michael Tsai:
There's no POP locking problem with SpamSieve because PowerMail is what
downloads the messages.
aob_ml - Check it out! There's your active developer
Michael Tsai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 11:37 PM, Janusz Buda wrote:
Ever since updating to PowerMail 4.2 and SpamSieve 2.0 the PM filters
have been setting about 90% of incoming mail (both spam and good) to
Label Priority No. 7, with no recognizable
aob_ml sez:
No I haven't already decided, I'm playing devils advocate here. And I'm
waiting for some point to come in and convince me.
The thing is that mail clients are an incredibly personal preference, so
nothing anyone says is likely going to convince you. People try mail
clients until they
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 8:15 am -0400, aob_ml wrote:
Thankfully I run my own domain, and have been able to run some filtering
at that level.
Maybe SpamAssassin would be a better option for you?
When I mentioned that $25 for SpamSieve was a deal breaker, it's not that
$25 is a lot of money,
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 11:37 PM, Janusz Buda wrote:
Ever since updating to PowerMail 4.2 and SpamSieve 2.0 the PM filters
have been setting about 90% of incoming mail (both spam and good) to
Label Priority No. 7, with no recognizable pattern.
I noticed that the SpamSieve
On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 08:15 AM, aob_ml wrote:
The problem with the external filters is the obvious poplock problem,
when the filter tries to connect at the same time.
There's no POP locking problem with SpamSieve because PowerMail is what
downloads the messages.
--
Michael
On 12 September Scott at HobbyLink Japan wrote:
The only reasons for sticking with OS 9 or earlier at this point are
inertia, psychological resistance to change, or unwillingness to invest
even a modest sum of money
[SNIP]
What's that? You're still using an old Mac that won't even run OS
Austin,
I expect stability
I had this problem for some time that PowerMail crashed rather often.
After using the built in features to compact the database and rebuilding
the index, the problem disappeared. Now PowerMail is running for months
without any crash under Mac OS X 10.2.6.
AppleScript
Forgive my ignorance here: I know next to nothing about Applescript!
I've got a simple script to run Mailfilter, then check mail in PowerMail.
It's simply:
---
do shell script /usr/local/bin/mailfilter
delay 10
tell application PowerMail
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 2:21 pm +0900, Scott at HobbyLink Japan wrote:
Whether $25 is a lot of money or not for SpamSieve is something only you
can decide, but let me offer this: I'd be quite surprised if anybody
else's (free or built-in) spam system worked as well as it does. Not
only that,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003, it is attributed to aob_ml to have said:
but I expect stability in
return, which I have never really gotten.
This I don't get. What OS you working on? Here on MOSX, PM has never
once crashed in the half-year I have been using it...
Do have one Q about T-Bird: how does
Judi Sohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:20:52 -0600 Bill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
I have to agree, if you get too much spam, get SpamSieve period.
And here's another vote. Shortly after I downloaded SpamSieve 2.0
(upgrade) I wiped out my corpus as recommended and used my
SpamSieve ($25) vs. Free. There's the breaker there. Seems like I might
be throwing good money after bad. That and it is a kludge in this day
and age where nearly every other mail app has some spam filtering.
Performance isn't an issue on my hardware.. Speaking of which I can run
Thunderbird
Thunderbird Cons:
Unknown Future/Not Fully developed
Open Source No AppleScript (and
unlikely in at least the near future)
I took a quick peak at thunderbird and as cool it might seem, there are
definite points why I personally would not switch: don't think the
interface elegant nor really
Thunderbird Cons:
Unknown Future/Not Fully developed
Open Source
No AppleScript (and unlikely in at least the near future)
That last one is a fatal flaw for me.
With AppleScript, you can add features and shortcuts to a program and
customize it as you want. You mention as a con of PM that it
For me an obvious addition would be the Apple WebKit, to use Safari-
rendering of HTML-mails. On the other hand, that would mean going Cocoa,
I guess, and that would be parting from OS 8-9.
My vote is to do just that: Go Cocoa, and forget development for OS 8-9.
CTM can leave those versions
This is strange indeed.
I cannot remember the last time Powermail failed on me. I won't say it
hasn't, but never where it doesn't start up right again.
I like powermail because i hate HTML with all it's dancing garbage.
I do not find an irregularity in the updates, Skins don't are not
terribly
Well tried it today and cannot select text whether or not Enable HTML
Reader is selected. Marlyse I cannot zoom in either direction. All I get
is either the up or down arrow and flashing text. Then it may not stop at
View in Browser. There is nothing for me to select or zoom.
--
Mike Edwards
Okay, so I've been a *paid* user of Powermail 4 for I don't know, better
then 6 months. And I've been fairly happy. However Thunderbird has been
coming on strong, and I've installed it on a ton of friends computers,
and they've been totally thrilled. So here it is, I hate to give up on
What would be nice, is for PowerMail to allow the Mac OS-based ctrlM
shortcut, which highlights the first item in the menu bar. Then you can
use the arrow or tab keys to move to whichever menu and menu item you'd
like. Lots of other apps allow this; I wish PM would.
/Cap
28 matches
Mail list logo
