This whole argument seems to come down to the issue of whether random
servers through which an email may pass will truncate lines to 78 chars.
Several of us have pointed out that this does happen; Tass's experience
is that it never (or vanishingly rarely) does. I don't know if anyone can
provide
A-NO-NE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
and No hard-Return to assure the compatibility.
It's a bit silly to not allow hard-returns at the end of paragraphs or
paragraph headlines
PM 4.2.1 | OS X 10.2.6 | Powerbook G3/266 | 128 MB RAM | 20 GB HD
You are correct. I tested from here, and (to my surprise) PowerMail does
NOT wrap text that is being received. Now, if we could add the option to
not wrap when sending (or is that already possible)?
Carl
In response to this text from Marlyse Comte ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
sent on Monday, November
AppleScript will not see messages in folders that are set to View
Unread Only so be aware of the falsely lower number.
--
Andy Fragen
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003, Chris Walker said:
On 24/11/03 PowerMail Engineering wrote:
No direct way, but you can search for all messages whose date received is
I am looking for scripts to encrypt and decrypt messages in PowerMail by
using PGP 8 Freeware.
I've found some that require Frontier. But they don't run under Mac OS X.
How do I have to modify these scripts, so that they works without the
Frontier extensions?
Thank's for your help
Ruediger
Carl Ketterling wrote:
That begs the question: Is there a way to get the actual source as it
was received?
No
Another way to answer the above question: What does PowerMail do when I
'redirect' an email that I've received? Does it recreate the email and
reencode the attachment? Or does it
Yes, of course I put in my own returns. That's proper typing;
whether on paper, in a computer window, or so it might be printed
at the other end. To do otherwise is, I'm sorry to say, a laziness
induced by word processing programs that do the job for you, if
you let it. But it had never made
Carl Ketterling wrote:
Using AppleScript, I have source of message which the dictionary
describes as
source string [r/o] -- the RFC822 message source
Should that include the attachments as well? I have found that (at least
in some cases) it doesn't.
It does not include the
tass,
You say you sent this from a mailer which only breaks the lines as you
put them in. Let's see if this works. It looked like this to me when I
got it...:
___
I just wanted to take a moment to thank the makers of PowerMail for such
a great
looking program.
So far, things seem to be
Picking up with Chris Walker's post in thread Re(4): Need help finding
features/functions:
But if the sender and the receiver allowed no limit on the line length
would the same have happened? In other words is it PM that chops the
line length on receipt, or does it happen somewhere in between?
Carl,
PM strips out the attachment and saves it to a separate file. Therefore
the source of the message is only the source as it resides in the PM database.
--
Andy Fragen
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003, Carl Ketterling said:
Using AppleScript, I have source of message which the dictionary
describes
Carl Ketterling wrote:
Using AppleScript, I have source of message which the dictionary
describes as
source string [r/o] -- the RFC822 message source
Should that include the attachments as well? I have found that (at least
in some cases) it doesn't.
It does not include the
On 11/24/03 1:38 AM tass wrote:
Yes, of course I put in my own returns. That's proper typing;
whether on paper, in a computer window, or so it might be printed
at the other end. To do otherwise is, I'm sorry to say, a laziness
induced by word processing programs that do the job for you, if
a) realize that PM is not a heavy supporter of HTML.
-you can view HTML within PM or your preferred browser
-you can not send HTML messages out of PM
-people on this list... mostly... like text better than HTML
b) realize that PM conforms with internet standards.
-when composing
Hi PowerMail,
No direct way, but you can search for all messages whose date received is
older than 0 day. You will get a flat list of all your messages.
Nice!
Jim
--
Jim Pistrang
JP Computer Resources
413-256-4569
http://users.crocker.com/~pistrang
On 24/11/03 PowerMail Engineering wrote:
No direct way, but you can search for all messages whose date received is
older than 0 day. You will get a flat list of all your messages.
There is an Applescript, Count my Messages which will do it for you.
It works on 9 - don't know about X. I should
tass wrote on Mon 24 Nov 2003 at 01:38 -0700
Yes, of course I put in my own returns. That's proper typing;
whether on paper, in a computer window, or so it might be printed
at the other end.
I think you'll find 99% of users disagree. That is not the accepted way
of using electronic
tass wrote on Mon 24 Nov 2003 at 01:25 -0700
Hanagan is one of my other accounts
Yes, it was obvious actually. Although I though you might be one of your
mates put up to wind the list up.
Every line break I typed made it through all those server breakers that
have been touted as being the
Hi David.
I apologize for having taken you post harshly. Was getting a
little frustrated, I guess. :-)
Yes, of course I put in my own returns. That's proper typing;
whether on paper, in a computer window, or so it might be printed
at the other end. To do otherwise is, I'm sorry to
Jim Pistrang wrote:
Is there a way to determine the total number of messages in my PowerMail
database?
No direct way, but you can search for all messages whose date received is
older than 0 day. You will get a flat list of all your messages.
Jérôme - PowerMail Engineering
Hanagan wrote on Mon 24 Nov 2003 at 00:38 -0700
I was wondering though, before I spend the money, could anyone give me an
idea
of what some of the things I should watch out for are?
There are no proper instructions. But this list is helpful!
The beat way to answer your question is to use the
I promise, I didn't do this as an I told you so. But after such emphatic
resistance to what I knew to be fact, I just had to be sure I wasn't
suddenly living in some parallel universe.
Hanagan is one of my other accounts that resides on one of my old
Wintel boxes running the Courier
On 23/11/03 Wayne Brissette wrote:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/
20030208 Netscape/7.02
But if the sender and the receiver allowed no limit on the line length
would the same have happened? In other words is it PM that chops the
line length on receipt, or
I just wanted to take a moment to thank the makers of PowerMail for such
a great
looking program.
So far, things seem to be working pretty nicely.
I was wondering though, before I spend the money, could anyone give me
an idea
of what some of the things I should watch out for are?
I know
Hear! Hear! Hiro has spoken the simple truths. I think Michael would also
agree with them.
Just today I have been arguing with a colleague. He wants to sent a 100k
attachment to a 300 people, not all in readily accessible places. I say
we place all those would-be attachments on our web site and
I educate my clients,
Telling them email format must be simple for smooth communication,
Limit to simple text Only,
No HTML,
No attachment but send notice beforehand when needed,
and No hard-Return to assure the compatibility.
--
- Hiro
[PROTECTED] [PROTECTED]
Mikael Byström wrote:
I'm willing to work with you offline to save you the money for buying
Emailchemy. More fun to also make someone else happy. Just send off a
message. I will have time during the coming week as I'm just finishing a
job. At least I can send you the ftp URL for the script
27 matches
Mail list logo
