Hi there,
I'd like to second and comment on couple of points made by Ben and Bill.
Especially these ;-):
This is really distracting and made me check PM couple of times just
finding no new email:
- after every mail check PM is now bouncing the dock icon, regardless
of whether there was actually
Karsten Liere wrote at 10:04 AM (+0100) on 11/21/08:
Works fine on my machine though - no problem here:
- sleeping the computer in one location (wireless network) then awaking
in another causes PM to hang (stack trace on request).
Yeah, I might have to rescind this; I moved locations again later
Hello,
I've just taken a short look on the new version.
I can't run pm5 in the same time as v6.
I miss a settings for sorting according threads.
I receive most mails from different lists and sorting by thread is for
me the most missing feature in pm5 and styled text the last thing I
really
Matthias Schmidt (21/11/08, 12:29) said:
well, I forgot to mention one thing,
I'm wondering, why the database format was not changed.
A one-file-monolythic database is really not up-to-date together with
technologies like Time Machine.
And the most often asked feature request in the past was to
Jeremy Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:19 +
That is a major disappointment to me :(
I currently have to compact the database twice a week to avoid this limit.
Not sure how long I can continue using PowerMail...
You might be missing this feature.
Instead of
Am/On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:17:16 + schrieb/wrote Derry Thompson:
Jeremy Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:19 +
That is a major disappointment to me :(
I currently have to compact the database twice a week to avoid this limit.
Not sure how long I can continue
Derry Thompson (21/11/08, 15:17) said:
That is a major disappointment to me :(
I currently have to compact the database twice a week to avoid this limit.
Not sure how long I can continue using PowerMail...
You might be missing this feature.
Instead of multiplying risks with bigger and bigger
Matthias Schmidt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Sat, 22 Nov 2008
00:32:59 +0900
No I didn't miss that one, but we could do that before.
Ah, but I wasn't replying to you :).
What they added is just a Macro for doing so automatically.
Yes, I agree, like I said It's not idea, but it does make
Jeremy Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:43:56 +
I tried that a while back, and it wasn't a good solution.
Ahh. Ok.
In any case, I don't want bigger and bigger databases. I want separate
databases for each email folder (like in Apple Mail). It's fine if these
have a 2
While it's great there is new update (finally!), it really should be a
point release.
I'd love to give PowerMail money for an upgrade. I think it should have
more features in it: A major new release should have features that make
you go wow!.
George Henne
Am/On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:16:46 -0500 schrieb/wrote George Henne:
While it's great there is new update (finally!), it really should be a
point release.
I'd love to give PowerMail money for an upgrade. I think it should have
more features in it: A major new release should have features that make
Ben Kennedy wrote:
Yeah, I might have to rescind this; I moved locations again later in the
evening, and had no such hang/crash. However, PM did give the usual
connection error messages immediately, rather than wait until I was re-
established on the new network (I thought that was supposedly
powermail-discuss Digest #2903 - Friday, November 21, 2008
test?
by Dave N [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feedback on PM 6 beta (4574)
by Ben Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PM 6 beta (4574)
by Bill Schjelderup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Feedback on PM 6 beta (4574)
by
I had two versions of the account information for my main email account
in Mail Accounts. The older one was set up for receiving mail, the newer
one for sending. Yesterday I deleted the older account and now have set
the newer one to check for mail.
Now PowerMail wants to re-download all
Am/On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:22:01 -0500 schrieb/wrote Winston Weinmann:
I had two versions of the account information for my main email account
in Mail Accounts. The older one was set up for receiving mail, the newer
one for sending. Yesterday I deleted the older account and now have set
the newer
I'm sort of the opposite of some of the opinions expressed here.
1. I am happy to pay for an upgrade. I could care less if it is 6.0
or 5.6.5.001. I want CTM Development to continue seeing PowerMail
as something worth putting time into (and for them to stay in the
black). The upgrade
Lyle D. Gunderson wrote at 7:39 PM (-0700) on 11/21/08:
1. I am happy to pay for an upgrade. I could care less if it is 6.0
or 5.6.5.001. I want CTM Development to continue seeing PowerMail
as something worth putting time into (and for them to stay in the
black). The upgrade cost is about
On or about 13:51 Ben Kennedy said -
While backups are always a good idea, your reasoning sounds a little fishy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betta
;)
-ben
nyuck, nyuck, nyuck !
Graham
18 matches
Mail list logo
