listes said:
>I would agree, just deleting the index and rebuilding it may be better
>:-)
Well, after rebuilding the index on several occasions, I found it didn't
take significantly less time than building it from scratch after deletion
and rebuilding often didn't succeed too. Rebuilding twice d
Mikael Byström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I managed to solve this forced rebuild indices problem only by *deleting*
> the "Message Database index" file before rebuilding. While the cause of
> forced rebuilding have been unknown, this have never failed me.
Here on a new MBP I got this issue be
>>Off the top of my head, I would simply reserve a section of the
>>folder list for Smart Folders, in between the In/Out Trays and the
>>'regular' folders.
>
>This is not necessarily a good solution, unless the different
>characteristics of a smart folder are clearly indicated.
Smart folders shou
Rick Lecoat said:
>I do agree that your argument about the message browser being for
>listing messages in *definite* locations has a certain logic to it. But
>I am not convinced that it outweighs (for me) the usability factor. By
>your argument there is no place in the browser for any sort of 'sm
Paul Collett said:
>a folder dedicated to all your recent mail that will
>still be there even if you shut down, plus a copy of the mail in it's
>"home folder".
Generally, I feel that because duplicate messages requires that all
message attributes are kept synched to be truly useful, your solution
This might have been mentioned before, but something I've set up to
replace the recent mail window and keep a record of recent mail even
after shut-downs is a filter immediately after the spam filters with the
following basic conditions:
Move message into folder (New Mail) - which I've created at
Yes. All one has to do is spend a few minutes in Mail and play around
with the smart folders to see how unbelievably powerful they are.
After all what is RMW but a smart window with the criteria of 'new
message since last restart'.
--
Andy Fragen
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Rick Lecoat said:
>The i
Mikael;
I certainly agree that newcomers should be amply catered for; they are
the lifeblood of any small developer. However, this is POWERmail... and
having a greater degree of sophistication available for those who want
it would seem to go along with the name, and cannot be a bad thing
provided
Well, the previous discussions about this subject (and there have been
many!) would seem to favour having the RMW turned into a sort of smart
folder in the folder list, presumably positioned alongside the In Tray
and Out Tray. Thus it wold be no more intrusive than any other folder --
if you don't
Rick Lecoat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> And the Recent Mail window integrated into the browser...
This doesn't make much sense actually. What's the gain? The Recent Mail
window is one button press action away. It's an overview of what recent
messages there are in in the browsers database. These
Rick Lecoat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> And the Recent Mail window integrated into the browser...
NO! please do not do this! Or let me select an option to do not show
it. I NEVER use this window, it is completely unneccesary to me.
--
http://www.subhash.at
I managed to solve this forced rebuild indices problem only by *deleting*
the "Message Database index" file before rebuilding. While the cause of
forced rebuilding have been unknown, this have never failed me.
PM 5.2.3 Swedish | OS X 10.3.9 | Powerbook G4/400Mhz | 1GB RAM | 30GB HD
Yes, the filtering options are one of the primary reasons that I always
return to PM after checking out each new incarnation of Mail (which I do
with every new 'full' version of OS X -- Jaguar, Panther, Tiger etc.)
Still, I've said it before and I'll say it again: I would DEARLY love to
be able t
The main reasons I use PM are for its outstanding
filtering structure (I don't use it for Anti-Spam, I own a
Barracuda for that), but PM's ability to strip attachments
from the mail database automatically- which to my
knowledge, neither Apple Mail or Entourage can do
Victor
On Mon, 20 Ma
Well said, Rick, as I linger here on my webmail *barf*.
Victor
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:19:25 +
"Rick Lecoat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't help thinking that maybe PM should be able to
>deal with such
> corrupted HTML messages more gracefully than this.
>Victor alone would
> seem
Yeah,, but how do you open up Powermail to kill this
message, when the application doesn't open (and just wants
to rebuild the sort indices over and over again?
Victor
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:55:55 -0500
"A-NO-NE Music" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Victor Orly / 2006/03/20 / 11:16 AM wrote:
I can't help thinking that maybe PM should be able to deal with such
corrupted HTML messages more gracefully than this. Victor alone would
seem to have lost 24 hours or more of time to this problem. Certain
things need to be acknowledged I think:
1. Whatever our feelings about them, we all receiv
Victor Orly / 2006/03/20 / 11:16 AM wrote:
>Now, three time over the last two days, it wants to
>rebuild the sort inces - which takes 12+ HOURS. When it is
>done, it just closes right away and wants to rebuild
>again.
>
>What is going on?
I had this a while ago, and the culprit was a corrupte
Good Morning;
I just got m MacBook Pro (2.0 GHz) last week 2 months
after ordereing it and migrated from my old PB 17" 1.5
GHz.
For two days, PM 5.2.3, with it's supposed Universal
Binary status worked, but on ocassion, just closed without
warning.
Now, three time over the last two days, it
19 matches
Mail list logo
