Re: PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-22 Thread Tim Lapin
On Friday, November 21, 2008, Derry Thompson sent forth: Jeremy Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:43:56 + I tried that a while back, and it wasn't a good solution. Ahh. Ok. In any case, I don't want bigger and bigger databases. I want separate databases for each

Re: Feedback on PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread Karsten Liere
Hi there, I'd like to second and comment on couple of points made by Ben and Bill. Especially these ;-): This is really distracting and made me check PM couple of times just finding no new email: - after every mail check PM is now bouncing the dock icon, regardless of whether there was actually

Re: Feedback on PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread Ben Kennedy
Karsten Liere wrote at 10:04 AM (+0100) on 11/21/08: Works fine on my machine though - no problem here: - sleeping the computer in one location (wireless network) then awaking in another causes PM to hang (stack trace on request). Yeah, I might have to rescind this; I moved locations again later

Re: PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread Matthias Schmidt
Hello, I've just taken a short look on the new version. I can't run pm5 in the same time as v6. I miss a settings for sorting according threads. I receive most mails from different lists and sorting by thread is for me the most missing feature in pm5 and styled text the last thing I really

Re: PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Matthias Schmidt (21/11/08, 12:29) said: well, I forgot to mention one thing, I'm wondering, why the database format was not changed. A one-file-monolythic database is really not up-to-date together with technologies like Time Machine. And the most often asked feature request in the past was to

Re: PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread Derry Thompson
Jeremy Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:19 + That is a major disappointment to me :( I currently have to compact the database twice a week to avoid this limit. Not sure how long I can continue using PowerMail... You might be missing this feature. Instead of

Re: PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread Matthias Schmidt
Am/On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:17:16 + schrieb/wrote Derry Thompson: Jeremy Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:19 + That is a major disappointment to me :( I currently have to compact the database twice a week to avoid this limit. Not sure how long I can continue

Re: PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Derry Thompson (21/11/08, 15:17) said: That is a major disappointment to me :( I currently have to compact the database twice a week to avoid this limit. Not sure how long I can continue using PowerMail... You might be missing this feature. Instead of multiplying risks with bigger and bigger

Re: PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread Derry Thompson
Matthias Schmidt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:32:59 +0900 No I didn't miss that one, but we could do that before. Ah, but I wasn't replying to you :). What they added is just a Macro for doing so automatically. Yes, I agree, like I said It's not idea, but it does make

Re: PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread Derry Thompson
Jeremy Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:43:56 + I tried that a while back, and it wasn't a good solution. Ahh. Ok. In any case, I don't want bigger and bigger databases. I want separate databases for each email folder (like in Apple Mail). It's fine if these have a 2

Re(2): PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread George Henne
While it's great there is new update (finally!), it really should be a point release. I'd love to give PowerMail money for an upgrade. I think it should have more features in it: A major new release should have features that make you go wow!. George Henne

Re: PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread Matthias Schmidt
Am/On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:16:46 -0500 schrieb/wrote George Henne: While it's great there is new update (finally!), it really should be a point release. I'd love to give PowerMail money for an upgrade. I think it should have more features in it: A major new release should have features that make

Re: Feedback on PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-21 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Ben Kennedy wrote: Yeah, I might have to rescind this; I moved locations again later in the evening, and had no such hang/crash. However, PM did give the usual connection error messages immediately, rather than wait until I was re- established on the new network (I thought that was supposedly

Feedback on PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-20 Thread Ben Kennedy
Congrats on the beta! I downloaded it and bought my upgrade this afternoon. After some initial use, here are some of my observations: - after every mail check PM is now bouncing the dock icon, regardless of whether there was actually any new mail. - sleeping the computer in one location

PM 6 beta (4574)

2008-11-20 Thread Bill Schjelderup
Thanks for the PM update! I've downloaded it, purchased the upgrade, and just for fun, ordered FoxTrot Pro to see how I like it. Got my FoxTrot Pro serial number, but not Powermail v6 serial number. Previous Betas have been good enough for real use, I'm hoping this is the same as that's what