Foxpro and .NET are both application frameworks and Linux is an OS. It
seem applications are moving towards becoming OS agnostic, which would
make the OS less relevant than in the past. This allow the developer to
write the application without worrying about the OS problem. An
application w
Ted Roche wrote:
> Flame war to keep us warm today:
>
> >From Ed Foster's Gripeline:
>
> "One long-time reader -- by no means a Microsoft apologist -- recently
> crystallized the issue this way in pondering Windows security
> concerns. "My staff and I talk about this a lot, because we are
> spendin
On 6/5/07, Stephen the Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From the school of Denial ;->
Mmmm... getting warmer!
> .NET is overwhelming in it's capabilities today and they are going to roll
> out a more feature rich version later this year or early next.
Yeah, yeah! Just wait til next year!
>
If it has not Outlook install in the mathine , then the error message is "
Class definition Outlook.Application is not found " . so the reason should not
be this problem .
在2007-06-06，"Bob Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道：
Outlook Installed ? :) Bob Lee - Original Message - From: "John J.
Kevin Cully <> wrote:
> Okay. Who wrote to Ed at the Grip Line from this list?
>
> I disagree with this VFP developer.
>
> (1) VFP is still relevant and will be for years into the future
>From the school of Denial ;->
> (2) Linux and FOSS is a viable development platform and viable tools.
I
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 16:25, Derek Kalweit wrote:
> > > Well, if it even passed, for a while it would change things. Then the
> > > money would find a way back in, as the money always does. The Ds are
> > > WAY more corrupt than the Rs, but both are corrupt.
> >
> > That's why people need to stop
John
Could it be your Firewall refusing to allow Outlook?
I get a similar message when trying IE which has not been cleared by the
Firewall.
Andrew Stirling
01250 874580
http://www.calcpay.co.uk
HMRC Accredited UK payroll program
John J. Mihaljevic wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Using VFP 9, I'm using
> > Well, if it even passed, for a while it would change things. Then the money
> > would find a way back in, as the money always does. The Ds are WAY more
> > corrupt than the Rs, but both are corrupt.
> That's why people need to stop just voting D/R because they've always
> voted D/R, but instea
On Jun 5, 2007, at 5:13 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
>> We're not providing the rich GUI. There are several rich UI toolkits
>> available, such as Qt/KDE, Gtk/GNOME, and our choice, wxPython/
>> wxWidgets. What we're doing is making them easy for any developer to
>> use.
>>
> Yours is a w
Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:21, Bill Arnold wrote:
>
>> Make a
>> public financing system. That will change the earmarks.
>>
>
> Hi Bill!
>
> Well, if it even passed, for a while it would change things. Then the money
> would find a way back in, as the money always doe
Ed Leafe wrote:
> We're not providing the rich GUI. There are several rich UI toolkits
> available, such as Qt/KDE, Gtk/GNOME, and our choice, wxPython/
> wxWidgets. What we're doing is making them easy for any developer to
> use.
>
Yours is a wrapper around the above listed GUIs, rig
>>"OLE error code 0x8007007e: The specified module could not be found."<<
I have seen this error on my old machine, or something very similar after
uninstalling Norton
AntiVirus. Search the ProFox archives because there was some discussion on this
issue last year
iirc.
Rick
White Light Computin
On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:57 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
>> There is nothing, and I mean that
>> honestly, nothing in the Linux world that can match the rich GUI and
>> feature interface of these tools, no matter what the downsides, of
>> which there are plenty as well. But on balance, my decision
Ted Roche wrote:
> Flame war to keep us warm today:
>
> >From Ed Foster's Gripeline:
>
> "One long-time reader -- by no means a Microsoft apologist -- recently
> crystallized the issue this way in pondering Windows security
> concerns. "My staff and I talk about this a lot, because we are
> spendin
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:21, Bill Arnold wrote:
>Make a
> public financing system. That will change the earmarks.
Hi Bill!
Well, if it even passed, for a while it would change things. Then the money
would find a way back in, as the money always does. The Ds are WAY more
corrupt than the Rs, b
Outlook Installed ? :)
Bob Lee
- Original Message -
From: "John J. Mihaljevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 11:29 AM
Subject: Starting Outlook from within VFP
> Hi all,
>
> Using VFP 9, I'm using the following code:
>
> loOutlookApp = CREATE
On 6/5/07, Sytze de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> D drive tells me volume label "Monday" with 95 Mb free.
> I double click D drive and I can see a very large TMP file.
> I delete this file.
> I do the backup again.
> All is well.
Check for a USB tab plugged into the computer?
Find out if they
There was just one memorable spark in the Democrats debate on CNN
Sunday. It lasted about a minute, then disappeared.
The subject turns for a very few seconds to the power of "interest
groups" in Washington, which Kucinich wants to "move away" from. Biden
quickly jumps on the opportunity to steal
(Is this NF or OT?)
Here's something to wake up to
Client called me in to check Backup issue (My app backs up to CD-RW).
I double click "My computer" and I can see C drive and D drive.
D drive tells me volume label "Monday" with 95 Mb free.
I double click D drive and I can see a very large TMP fi
It's because everyone is glued to TV, watching the America's cup ...
(Kiwi) Sytze
On 6/5/07, Man-wai Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tristan Leask wrote:
> > Testing,
>
> contact... torpedo 1 fired... :)
>
> --
>@~@http://changmw.homeip.net
> / v \ May the Force and Fa
Security Suite package has installed a "Script" blocker in the mix.
This might shed some light:
Look at message #4 on the following page:
http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-2461785.php
Tracy
-Original Message-
From: John J. Mihaljevic
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:30 PM
Hi all,
U
Okay. Who wrote to Ed at the Grip Line from this list?
I disagree with this VFP developer.
(1) VFP is still relevant and will be for years into the future
(2) Linux and FOSS is a viable development platform and viable tools.
(3) .NET is not a slam dunk choice as a development platform. I'm
watc
Hi all,
Using VFP 9, I'm using the following code:
loOutlookApp = CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")
I get an error that says:
"OLE error code 0x8007007e: The specified module could not be
found."
Any ideas what I need to look for here?
Thanks!
John
_
Hi
I have been offline since soon after posting the original mail to this
thread - please don't think I "posted and ran". Thanks to all who
replied with suggestions (which I am looking into) as opposed to those
of you (Amiga fans) who decided to hijack the thread without even having
the decen
Yeah. I reread your post and realized that you were referring to more
than one control. I still think turning on event tracking is a great way
to see what's happening.
The topic in the docs is "events, sequence in Visual FoxPro." I'm
guessing that the Wiki will probably have some good stuff, to
>
> Great stuff, lousy marketing. Hmm, that reminds me of something else...
>
Yeah, me too. The HP 100vg Ethernet protocol. It does not depend on
Collision Detect & Resend technology, as it is totally collision free, and
even in a fully loaded LAN with up to 1,024 devices one could be assured of
Flame war to keep us warm today:
>From Ed Foster's Gripeline:
"One long-time reader -- by no means a Microsoft apologist -- recently
crystallized the issue this way in pondering Windows security
concerns. "My staff and I talk about this a lot, because we are
spending so much time updating and fig
On 6/5/07, Dan Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But it also (if that's reason) had some advantages, you could as an
> example make a bootable ramdisk so you needed only to load
> systemfiles after a cold start. The ramdisk survived soft reboots so
> the next time you could boot up entirely from
At 2007-06-05 14:40, you wrote:
>On 6/5/07, Alan Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dan Olsson wrote:
> > > and still there is no OS that can multitask as well as it could
> >
> > Er ... is this the Amiga OS running on 68000-series chips? With
> no memory protection? Meaning that a misbehaved p
I used to do this all the time.
Recently, I downloaded a list of items bought from the supermarket using
our loyalty card and made it into a sheet with tick boxes, stick it on
the board and just tick stuff as we go before the shopping trip at the
end of the week, hence one reminder sheet.
Just r
> Like many busy families, we keep a dry erase board on the
> fridge for everyone to jot down items to be bought on the next
> grocery run. Sometimes, it gets quite full, and I have limited
> time to get to the store and back. So, instead of sitting down
> and copying each item on a list, I use my
From a thrift group mailing list I'm on:
Picture This!
Like many busy families, we keep a dry erase board on the
fridge for everyone to jot down items to be bought on the next
grocery run. Sometimes, it gets quite full, and I have limited
time to get to the store and bac
Sorry, I don't think I have explained this at all well.
The interactive event of the LIST box is not firing after the valid
event. In theory it should because you are interactively changing the
value of the LIST box when you click on it (This fires the Valid event
of the edit box).
Ok, so in sum
Maybe I'm missing something but once you get to the Valid, haven't you
effectively left the object? (Assuming that the valid returns .t., of
course) Why would you expect the interactivechange to fire again?
Turning on event tracking can be quite helpful when you're trying to
determine the seque
They should have demoed some new M$ software...that's usually hilarious!
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
> Yeah, it looked to have been somewhat choreographed to me.
>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Main
On 6/5/07, Alan Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Olsson wrote:
> > and still there is no OS that can
> > multitask as well as it could
>
> Er ... is this the Amiga OS running on 68000-series chips? With no
> memory protection? Meaning that a misbehaved program could take down the
> entire sy
Dave Crozier wrote:
> Tristan,
> Just popping out for a quick sandwich. Will give it a look on my return!
>
>
What did you have on your sandwich Dave? We need to know. :-)
Peter
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: htt
Tristan Leask wrote:
> Testing,
contact... torpedo 1 fired... :)
--
@~@http://changmw.homeip.net
/ v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.21.3
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 7.04) 19:34:01 up 9 days 3:07
^ ^0 users load average: 1.05 1.00 1.00
news://news.3home.net news://news.
On Jun 5, 2007, at 3:39 AM, Tristan Leask wrote:
> Wooh, quiet on here of late!
And usually people complain that there's *too much* noise on this list!
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe
Tristan,
Just popping out for a quick sandwich. Will give it a look on my return!
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Tristan Leask
Sent: 05 June 2007 11:43
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Valid event screwing with click event?
Hehe, I didn't seem to have a fresh problem. The issue I was having was
to do with the value change (selection change) in the list box after the
valid event finishing, but then VFP not firing an event for the value
change (selection change).
Oh er, the joys of event sequences!
Tristan
-Ori
HTst
Hold that one,
It does solve a refresh problem but not the problem of putting the NEW value
in the editbox.
Let me take a look.
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Tristan Leask
Sent: 05 June 2007 11:22
To: profox@leafe.com
Tristan,
Sorry I just assumed you were on vfp9. In that case add
thisform.list1.refresh()
at the end of the same section. This solves the problem
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Tristan Leask
Sent: 05 June 2007 11:
Hmm, another reason to upgrade! lol
Not being able to test that, wouldn't that just refresh the list box and
not actually fire the interactive change event?
In theory, shouldn't the interactive event fire after the valid event
has finished returning a .T.? Thus...
1) User modifies the edit box
Tristan,
Add a RaiseEvent(thisform.list1,"Requery") at the end of the section
starting "case lnAns=6"
Dave Crozier
PROCEDURE edit1.Valid
IF thisform.changes
lnAns=MESSAGEBOX("You have made changes. Do you want to save
them?",3+32,"Test")
DO CASE
CASE lnAns=2
On 6/5/07, Alan Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Olsson wrote:
> > and still there is no OS that can
> > multitask as well as it could
>
> Er ... is this the Amiga OS running on 68000-series chips? With no
> memory protection? Meaning that a misbehaved program could take down the
> entire sy
Try throwing in a Thisform.Refresh() or an thisform.edit1.Refresh() after you
make the changes in the InteractiveChange event.
I always use thisform.Refresh()
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tristan Leask
Sent: Tue, 6/5/2007 5:26am
To: profox@leafe.c
I'm still having issues with this. Below is some example code where you
can modify the text in a list using the edit box. When you leave the
edit box focus, it asks you if you want to update the text. However
after it has updated the text, if the user has select another entry in
the list it shou
Dan Olsson wrote:
> and still there is no OS that can
> multitask as well as it could
Er ... is this the Amiga OS running on 68000-series chips? With no
memory protection? Meaning that a misbehaved program could take down the
entire system? ;)
Speak upcan't hear you!
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Tristan Leask
Sent: 05 June 2007 08:39
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: [NF] Test
Testing,
Wooh, quiet on here of late!
Tristan Leask
Software Developer
Marine S
Testing,
Wooh, quiet on here of late!
Tristan Leask
Software Developer
Marine Software Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.marinesoftware.co.uk
--
This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unles
51 matches
Mail list logo
