Hey Stephen - sorry its taken me so long to respond to your reply. You
know I always appreciate your insights - all joking aside...
1st - I'm not actually compiling the screen into an EXE. Refer to one of
my previous replies to this thread to understand why.
To answer your other questions in your
On 6/21/2012 5:03 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Those lines appearing like that were so peculiar - I didn't even THINK
> to do the Refresh thing. I shall give that a shot and see what
> happens...
>
> Although I just DID try it - and, no luck - still the little lines
> appear!
>
> :-(
And the only think
Those lines appearing like that were so peculiar - I didn't even THINK
to do the Refresh thing. I shall give that a shot and see what
happens...
Although I just DID try it - and, no luck - still the little lines
appear!
:-(
-K-
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mail
On 6/21/2012 12:19 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> You TOTALLY Got me on that one! Ouch!!!
>
> Yes - I just did try using the SetAll command - and it also works.
> Although, its just taking 3 lines of code down to 1. But, that's cool
> too.
>
> However, strangely enough - I have another new strange error.
However, in the OLD system - which I am making this screen so it can
work in BOTH the Old and the New system - there are NO Classes in the
Old system. Also, by making this as a Stand-alone Form, I can simply
drop it onto the client system - and both the Old and New systems can
BOTH see the screen.
The main reason for a class, IMHO, is if you need to adjust anything, add a
property or method. To make a class from the offset means you have choices
later. And anyone who programs will know, the original simple idea is
probably not what you end up with. Its not like classes are hard to make.
-up a new window and does the proper
graphical looking search!
-K-
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com]
On Behalf Of Allen
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:26 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Accessing Form Objects Numerically..
Wendt
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 6:18 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Accessing Form Objects Numerically...
Even if I add something later - it will still be a Visual Control with a
Visible property. But, if I use the SetAll - and there Was a New Control
that did NOT have a Visible property
You TOTALLY Got me on that one! Ouch!!!
Yes - I just did try using the SetAll command - and it also works.
Although, its just taking 3 lines of code down to 1. But, that's cool
too.
However, strangely enough - I have another new strange error.
When I make all the controls visible again - after t
-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com]
On Behalf Of Allen
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:12 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Accessing Form Objects Numerically...
What if you add something later?
Al
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Wendt
Yes
What if you add something later?
Al
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Wendt
Yes - Richard makes a good point. But, since I know all the objects I
create will have a visible property - and I will be Testing the screen
before giving it to the QA Techs to install - I'm sure I won't have a
prob
red I also don't need the Catch stuff...
-K-
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com]
On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:25 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Accessing Form Objects Numerica
Ah man - why does everybody always bust on Stephen? Well - better him
than me!!!:-)
Stephen - I will respond to your points shortly - since it needs a more
lengthy reply - and I really trying to push forwards on this pojrect -
when not also bothered by others here at work...
-K-
-Ori
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com]
On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:57 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Accessing Form Objects Numerically...
FOR nCnt = 1 TO Thisform.ControlCount
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:22 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC
wrote:
> On 6/21/2012 11:07 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
>> But - Stephen - why bother. Those 3 lines of code I showed - are SO
>> UTTERLY Simple - and does exactly what's need. Why waste time and make
>> things more complex than they need to b
other than text boxes and labels, you
don't have to worry about this.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:10 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Accessing Form
On 6/21/2012 11:10 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> What kind of Non-Visual control? You mean - like a Timer object?
>
> But, on this form - it will all be standard stuff, labels, text boxes,
> buttons and a Grid. All standard Visual controls, which will of course
> all have a Visible property.
>
> Again -
On 6/21/2012 11:07 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> But - Stephen - why bother. Those 3 lines of code I showed - are SO
> UTTERLY Simple - and does exactly what's need. Why waste time and make
> things more complex than they need to be?
Bingo!
>
> Or - were you just attempting humor in the last response??
On 6/21/2012 10:56 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> So - I implemented this:
> FOR nCnt = 1 TO Thisform.ControlCount
> Thisform.Controls[nCnt].Visible = .F.
> ENDFOR
>
> And - OMG - it worked like a Charm!!! Such utterly simple code - yet, it
> does EXACTLY What I needed.
>
> But, still
21, 2012 10:57 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Accessing Form Objects Numerically...
FOR nCnt = 1 TO Thisform.ControlCount
Thisform.Controls[nCnt].Visible = .F.
ENDFOR
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscript
But - Stephen - why bother. Those 3 lines of code I showed - are SO
UTTERLY Simple - and does exactly what's need. Why waste time and make
things more complex than they need to be?
Or - were you just attempting humor in the last response???
:-)
-K-
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-bou
-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:57 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Accessing Form Objects Numerically...
FOR nCnt = 1 TO Thisform.ControlCount
Thisform.Controls[nCnt].Vi
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Based upon what you wrote below - I went back to the online help to try
> and figure it out. I found an example in there - with creating some kind
> of Array of Buttons on a screen. But, even in that example - it seemed
> to show that
Mike,
Based upon what you wrote below - I went back to the online help to try
and figure it out. I found an example in there - with creating some kind
of Array of Buttons on a screen. But, even in that example - it seemed
to show that I must know the names of the Objects on the screen - which
is e
Hey there Mike - thank you SO VERY Much for this help - and pointing me
in the right direction. Its oh SO Helpful. As always - the ProFox list
COMES Thru when needed the most. I shall definitely hit the HELP file as
you suggested for any additional explanation on the coding.
One thing though. When
Yup - same number - no change there!
-K-
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com]
On Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 9:33 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Accessing Form Objects Numerically...
On Thu, Jun
jects Numerically...
Memphis has some neat beers. :)
Al
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Wendt
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 3:22 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Accessing Form Objects Numerically...
Ha HA HA! You're a funny one Mr. Russell!
At least I'm not TOO Young to
Memphis has some neat beers. :)
Al
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Wendt
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 3:22 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Accessing Form Objects Numerically...
Ha HA HA! You're a funny one Mr. Russell!
At least I'm not TOO Young to go have a Beer!
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Ha HA HA! You're a funny one Mr. Russell!
>
> At least I'm not TOO Young to go have a Beer! So - when is THAT going to
> happen again - when will you be back out to the Island again???
---
I have a MAJOR system conversion first week
Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 9:21 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Accessing Form Objects Numerically...
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Kurt Wendt
wrote:
> Format Files???
set format to CustEdit
You youngster.
--
Stephen Russell
Sr.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Format Files???
set format to CustEdit
You youngster.
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN
901.246-0159 cell
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.c
On 6/20/2012 5:57 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Why you'd use @SAY/GET in VFP7??? I didn't use it! Its an old, OLD
> system - starting way back as Foxbase+ or FP for DOS. I didn't build it
> - I only support it - and add new features. Many times - if it's a
> completely new screen - I will actually make
Why you'd use @SAY/GET in VFP7??? I didn't use it! Its an old, OLD
system - starting way back as Foxbase+ or FP for DOS. I didn't build it
- I only support it - and add new features. Many times - if it's a
completely new screen - I will actually make it graphical as a Form.
The idea of using " FO
om
Subject: Re: Accessing Form Objects Numerically...
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Kurt Wendt
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
>
>
> I'm working on something here at work - that's a bit of a PITA. This
> particular client has 2 versions of a system - one looks like FP for
DOS
&g
On 6/20/2012 5:35 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
>
>
> I'm working on something here at work - that's a bit of a PITA. This
> particular client has 2 versions of a system - one looks like FP for DOS
> (white letters on Blue screen for most of the system) and runs under
> VFP7. The other syste
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
>
>
> I'm working on something here at work - that's a bit of a PITA. This
> particular client has 2 versions of a system - one looks like FP for DOS
> (white letters on Blue screen for most of the system) and runs under
> VFP7. The
Hey folks,
I'm working on something here at work - that's a bit of a PITA. This
particular client has 2 versions of a system - one looks like FP for DOS
(white letters on Blue screen for most of the system) and runs under
VFP7. The other system is a true VFP system with graphical screens and
ru
37 matches
Mail list logo
