On 7/21/06, Vince Teachout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just pulled that example out of my head to give a quick answer
this morning. If you only need a temp index, I honestly can't think of
anything that couldn't be done better with a SELECT DISTINCT. JMHO.
Update the underlying table, f
Peter Cushing wrote:
That means Ted has alice, carol and sue all to himself, the lucky
bleeder ;-)
BOTH Sues (twins) actually. The bastard.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT
Richard Kaye wrote:
There's one minor exception, imho. It may be useful as a temporary
index built at runtime as needed. Throw it away when you don't need it
anymore and certainly don't depend on its accuracy for anything other
than the current task. Of course, there are many other ways to
acc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Vince Teachout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delete the "bob" row
BROWSE
* oops! we have NO "bob!"
INDEX on fname TO crap unique && Let's rebuild the index - that will
fix it, right?
BROWSE
* oops! we have NO "bob!"
Unique = BAD
If you set order to 0 and browse, ar
There's one minor exception, imho. It may be useful as a temporary index
built at runtime as needed. Throw it away when you don't need it anymore
and certainly don't depend on its accuracy for anything other than the
current task. Of course, there are many other ways to accomplish a
filtered vi
> If you set order to 0 and browse, are all the bob's gone?
They shouldn't be because only the first Bob is in the index.
Regards,
Jim
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-fre
> From: Vince Teachout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delete the "bob" row
>
> BROWSE
> * oops! we have NO "bob!"
>
> INDEX on fname TO crap unique && Let's rebuild the index - that will
> fix it, right?
> BROWSE
> * oops! we have NO "bob!"
>
> Unique = BAD
If you set order to 0 and browse, are all the bo
Vince Teachout wrote:
SET DELETED ON
Create a table, Names with field fname c(10)
INSERT INTO Names (fname) values("bob")
INSERT INTO Names (fname) values("bob")
INSERT INTO Names (fname) values("bob")
INSERT INTO Names (fname) values("alice")
INSERT INTO Names (fname) values("carol")
INSERT INT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having a discussion with other developers and I found an index on a free table that was
UNIQUE. Perhaps it's left over from Fox 2.x days, but I'm trying to remember why I've
got this memory that it was a "no-no" and to be avoided? I'm trying to find a
copy of HackFox
On 20 Jul 2006 19:49:09 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Having a discussion with other developers and I found an index on a free table that was
UNIQUE. Perhaps it's left over from Fox 2.x days, but I'm trying to remember why I've
got this memory that it was a "no-no" and to
Having a discussion with other developers and I found an index on a free table
that was UNIQUE. Perhaps it's left over from Fox 2.x days, but I'm trying to
remember why I've got this memory that it was a "no-no" and to be avoided? I'm
trying to find a copy of HackFox but thought I'd post here
11 matches
Mail list logo
