On 2017-06-08 16:09, Richard Kaye wrote:
Salesforce? I cringe every time I have to use it. There's nothing
particularly intuitive about it, imho, at least out of the box.
I've not used Salesforce but their marketing youtube demo looked
impressive I thought. Then again, actually working with
At 13:09 2017-06-08, Richard Kaye wrote:
Salesforce? I cringe every time I have to use it. There's nothing
particularly intuitive about it, imho, at least out of the box.
set friday on
For starters, it does not come in a box, right?
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
__
At 12:56 2017-06-08, Ted Roche wrote:
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> I see plenty of Webpages that have been (mis)designed by others that
> are a horror to use. I do not like the poor UX.
>
> While Webpages can be great, etc., they all too often not only ar
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Ricardo Araoz wrote:
>
> I like the interface, looks really good and fast.
> Can you program hot keys?
> What about security?
> ---
For us, security is via AD creds that are demanded when you open the
application.
Before I say yes or no for Hot Keys, mo
On 08/06/17 22:49, Stephen Russell wrote:
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Ricardo Araoz wrote:
Nice form!
Couple of questions. Can you program hot keys so as to not use the mouse
to save the order for example?
And I'd like to know the language you use to program this app. Or should I
say langu
x27; web pages, also for business
application, internal or not; on any browser and any device; and is
customizable.
What do you want? Should I itemize the inconsistencies that I've seen
between browsers and even the same browser between applications? It is
pretty rude to say someone
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Ricardo Araoz wrote:
> Nice form!
> Couple of questions. Can you program hot keys so as to not use the mouse
> to save the order for example?
> And I'd like to know the language you use to program this app. Or should I
> say languages? And what about security, do y
Nice form!
Couple of questions. Can you program hot keys so as to not use the mouse
to save the order for example?
And I'd like to know the language you use to program this app. Or should
I say languages? And what about security, do you have to take care of it
or does the language/framework han
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:
> Salesforce? I cringe every time I have to use it. There's nothing
> particularly intuitive about it, imho, at least out of the box.
>
This is the system I use, LN, and how to place a sales order.
https://www.youtube.com/wat
PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: e: [NF] PyQT for desktop applications
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> In the end, both mediums can be crafted and form great pieces of art. The
>> petty bickering between the artist gets redundant after a while.
>>
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> I see plenty of Webpages that have been (mis)designed by others that
> are a horror to use. I do not like the poor UX.
>
> While Webpages can be great, etc., they all too often not only are not
> great but are horrid.
>
I suspec
At 09:44 2017-06-07, Edward Leafe wrote:
On Jun 6, 2017, at 11:28 PM,
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low
the bar got set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of
that would have NEVER been tolerated in
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> In the end, both mediums can be crafted and form great pieces of art. The
>> petty bickering between the artist gets redundant after a while.
>>
>
> While Webpages can be great, etc., they all too often not only are
> not great but a
At 05:14 2017-06-07, Stephen Russell wrote:
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> At 21:28 2017-06-06, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar got
>> set on what was an acceptable
On 2017-06-07 12:44, Edward Leafe wrote:
On Jun 6, 2017, at 11:28 PM,
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar
got set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would
have NEVER been tolerated in a
...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: e: [NF] PyQT for desktop applications
On Jun 6, 2017, at 11:28 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar got
> set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would have NEVER
On Jun 6, 2017, at 11:28 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar got
> set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would have NEVER
> been tolerated in a desktop app.
http://thedailywtf.com/
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> At 21:28 2017-06-06, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar got
>> set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would have
>> N
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar
> got set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would
> have NEVER been tolerated in a desktop app.
A lot of that was due to the previously mentioned mess that was and is
browser support. Things are a lot
At 21:28 2017-06-06, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
[snip]
I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the
bar got set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that
would have NEVER been tolerated in a desktop app.
But Web app UX has bee
On 2017-06-06 13:26, Brant E. Layton wrote:
One more point for the desktop application: Navigation.
I've worked with many applications that are intense data entry - and
the best ones can be 'driven' entirely from the keyboard. You don't
have to reach for the mouse to make
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
>
> I also find that Web forms are often laid out badly. They can not
> count on a screen size so they go with the one-per-line model:
> Data Item 1: _
> Data Item 2: _
> Data It
x27; web pages, also for business
application, internal or not; on any browser and any device; and is
customizable.
What do you want? Should I itemize the inconsistencies that I've seen
between browsers and even the same browser between applications? It is
pretty rude to say someone's
Browser can only access printers.
It may propose user to save a file, the latter decides where
Thierry Nivelet
http://foxincloud.com/
Give your VFP app a second life in the cloud
> Le 5 juin 2017 à 17:01, Alan Bourke a écrit :
>
> Thierry
>
>> Why? To get rid of the installation / maintenanc
FWIW, Web and/or FoxinCloud supports this scénario
Thierry Nivelet
http://foxincloud.com/
Give your VFP app a second life in the cloud
> Le 5 juin 2017 à 17:51, Stephen Russell a écrit :
>
> We are retiring many of our reports in SSRS and replacing them with Data
> Cube access to the data. We
PDF displayed in either a sub form within the same tab, a new tab or a new
browser window
http://foxincloud.com/tutotest/report.tuto
Thierry Nivelet
http://foxincloud.com/
Give your VFP app a second life in the cloud
> Le 5 juin 2017 à 17:51, Stephen Russell a écrit :
>
> We are retiring many
We are retiring many of our reports in SSRS and replacing them with Data
Cube access to the data. We had 140 reports at last upgrade in 2015 and
now planning for our next upgrade that number will fall to 50-60. All the
data is crunched in Excel at the user's need.
BI is such a major aspect of bu
Thierry
> Why? To get rid of the installation / maintenance / versioning hassles,
> and set up news labs quicker (developing country).
Absolutely a big advantage of the browser-centric application, in a
single-tenant installation at least.
You say 50 reports - how do you implement that? Render t
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> This is a similar argument as the one about 20 years ago as to whether
> posting into tables interactively was preferable to posting transactions in
> the traditional mainframe batches.
>
> I hated Sage and other "post it now" accounting syste
Behalf Of Thierry Nivelet
Sent: 05 June 2017 10:18
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] PyQT for desktop applications
Hi Alan,
I wish you could be a little more specific so that we can learn from your facts
and figures.
What I can say for sure, as it's real life, current experience, tha
Hi Alan,
I wish you could be a little more specific so that we can learn from your facts
and figures.
What I can say for sure, as it's real life, current experience, that a
biological analysis company, client of FoxInCloud, manages ALL its operations,
end to end from order entry to accounting,
On 6/3/2017 11:29 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jun 3, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Thierry Nivelet
wrote:
One of our clients, US based, has such an application. Initially the
Web version was designed for the external partners -- suppliers and
clients -- to interact with the company. Guess what, nowadays **all
That's the point I was trying to make. As of today trying to implement
everything in a browser remains impractical for many use cases. For many
others it is ideal.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
On Sun, 4 Jun 2017, at 08:05 AM, John Weller wrote:
> As always it's horses f
As always it's horses for courses! The major benefit of bespoke systems is
that they can be tailored to suit the task and there are undoubtedly some where
the web application is best and others where a desktop application wins.
John
John Weller
01380 723235
079763 93631
Sent from my iPad
> On
On Jun 3, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Thierry Nivelet wrote:
>
> One of our clients, US based, has such an application. Initially the Web
> version was designed for the external partners -- suppliers and clients -- to
> interact with the company. Guess what, nowadays **all employees** of the
> company u
internal or not; on any browser and any device; and is customizable.
If users preferred desktop applications, as you seem to argue, the
web-based Salesforce would not have forced the fastest growing company
of the 90's -- Siebel systems -- to a quasi bankruptcy in the early
2000's
evelopment.
And maybe I did not make something clear before: I'm talking about
internal enterprise applications. Not "general public" web pages. This
thread started with someone asking if anyone is even "looking for"
desktop applications any more. And my contention is
Le 3 juin 2017 à 00:33, Charlie-gm a écrit :
>
> Compared to browser incompatibilities, bizarre rendering that experts could
> not figure out, security snafus, and did I mention pathetic performance
> browser incompatibilities
Again, this is from the past; except very advanced HTML5/CSS3 featu
On 6/1/2017 5:10 PM, Andrew Stirling wrote:
Care to enlarge on this please.
" Simple file shares (dare I say even "sharepoint"?) make rich client
distribution fall-off-a-log easy and secure. "
The basic principle is:
- create a "startup" application that checks a "file share" for updates
and
SharePoint does a great deal of simple work for you if you let it. We fill
internal SP lists, orders to be shipped, with data from the ERP. We then
have mainly stagnant lists, Customers per say, and in SP we set a drop-down
list for the customer and it filters the orders, needing to go out today
I was really asking Charlie about how he proposed to get the 'desktop'
bit working easily.
'And before people start slobbering themselves with "... but... but...
the DISTRIBUTION OMG!! How could you DISTRIBUTE a rich client
application..." - really, don't bother. Simple file shares (dare I s
Posting a document to Sharepoint is so simple. Setting the library to hold
it is real easy as well. Keeping versions for me on the file is
tremendous. Having a recycle section for me to republish what you didn't
think you were screwing up is pretty good too.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Lau
Charlie,
+1
Laurie
On 1 June 2017 at 22:10, Andrew Stirling wrote:
> Care to enlarge on this please.
> " Simple file shares (dare I say even "sharepoint"?) make rich client
> distribution fall-off-a-log easy and secure. "
>
>
>
>
> Andrew Stirling
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruse
Care to enlarge on this please.
" Simple file shares (dare I say even "sharepoint"?) make rich client
distribution fall-off-a-log easy and secure. "
Andrew Stirling
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
view the same web pages in firefox, IE, and Chrome and expect
similar results. There is no web page that is truly responsive: every
web application where I work (which is quite a large company) is
pathetically slow. All their "browser-based" applications have
essentially turned into "Excel
The other thing is the j-word. Any language that needs the likes of
CoffeeScript or Typescript to impose sanity on it was an unfortunate
language to end up being the one built into browsers.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
On Wed, 31 May 2017, at 09:19 PM, Thierry Nivelet
At 13:19 2017-05-31, Thierry Nivelet wrote:
Today's Browsers follow standard https://caniuse.com/
Unfortunately, many *Websites* do not.
I very much dislike coming across a Website which has weird
dependencies and where I have to jump through hoops to get it to
work. It happens a
Today's Browsers follow standard
https://caniuse.com/
Thierry Nivelet
http://foxincloud.com/
Give your VFP app a second life in the cloud
> Le 31 mai 2017 à 21:30, Gene Wirchenko a écrit :
>
> At 07:55 2017-05-30, Alan Bourke wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 May 2017, at 12:05 PM, Stephen Russell wrot
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> At 12:27 2017-05-30, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Each environment has it's own line issues, but no users who are well versed
>> in "the internet vs the network" would ever ask for limited functionality,
>> instead, they would dem
At 12:27 2017-05-30, Stephen Russell wrote:
[snip]
Each environment has it's own line issues, but no users who are well versed
in "the internet vs the network" would ever ask for limited functionality,
instead, they would demand the web as it provides access to everything.
Do those well
At 07:55 2017-05-30, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2017, at 12:05 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Alan Bourke
> wrote:
>
> > > In 2017, how many users are looking for desktop apps?
> >
> > Still plenty.
> >
> >
> Seriously?
>
>
Seriously. Anything that needs
We too and you're welcome to it. 1st thing I did was install libre office.
On May 31, 2017 11:02 AM, "Alan Bourke" wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017, at 09:32 AM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
> > Ever tried office365 ? What a nice piece of rubbish that is. ;)
> >
>
> We have that at a corporate level, and i
On Wed, 31 May 2017, at 09:32 AM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
> Ever tried office365 ? What a nice piece of rubbish that is. ;)
>
We have that at a corporate level, and it's pretty good in terms of the
browser versions of Word and Excel. But a million miles away from the
desktop versions, still.
--
Ever tried office365 ? What a nice piece of rubbish that is. ;)
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Alan Bourke
wrote:
> The PC is dead and it will be all mobile devices...
> It'll all be cloud and nothing local...
> No more native apps, they'll all be in the browser...
>
> Like all predictions the
The PC is dead and it will be all mobile devices...
It'll all be cloud and nothing local...
No more native apps, they'll all be in the browser...
Like all predictions the truth is in between somewhere.
If for example Microsoft still don't have a browser version of Word that
is anything near the
On May 30, 2017, at 4:27 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> What are your favorite JavaScript tools/frameworks, Ed?
To be honest, I haven't done any client-side interfaces for some time now, so I
don't have a favorite. I work pretty much exclusively on the back end of the
On 2017-05-30 15:27, Stephen Russell wrote:
Seems like it can be done. Now tell me about OCX files that need to be
installed.
Each environment has it's own line issues, but no users who are well
versed
in "the internet vs the network" would ever ask for limited
functionality,
instead, they w
On 2017-05-30 14:33, Ed Leafe wrote:
Ten years ago I would have wholeheartedly agreed with you. Five years
ago I wouldn't have been too sure about that. Now think that the
Javascript tools and frameworks have advanced so that they can do as
much or more than desktop widgets, and they totally kick
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Alan Bourke
wrote:
> The thing is that yes you can get a fluid, responsive, beautiful UI
> using one of the three billion client side frameworks, coupled to a
> back end developed with this week's server-side framework but to make it
> secure and to test it on al
1/10 th of the time using FoxinCloud with integrated Bootstrap support. Just
adapt your VFP app, and/or write an extension for the web using your extent
classes, and you're done.
Thierry Nivelet
http://foxincloud.com/
Give your VFP app a second life in the cloud
> Le 30 mai 2017 à 20:45, Alan
The thing is that yes you can get a fluid, responsive, beautiful UI
using one of the three billion client side frameworks, coupled to a
back end developed with this week's server-side framework but to make it
secure and to test it on all the browsers on all the platforms is
literally ten times the
On May 30, 2017, at 11:26 AM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> Just responded to Ed's post saying that a desktop UI still kicks ass over a
> web page UI.
Ten years ago I would have wholeheartedly agreed with you. Five years ago I
wouldn't have been too sure about that. Now t
+1
On May 30, 2017 6:28 PM, "Paul H. Tarver" wrote:
> Seriously.
>
> Not all programming is for web-based applications and not all clients want
> web-based applications.
>
> If this were true, this group would not exist.
>
> Neither would any of the thousands o
Seriously.
Not all programming is for web-based applications and not all clients want
web-based applications.
If this were true, this group would not exist.
Neither would any of the thousands of desktop (VFP!) applications that are
still being supported every day.
Neither would my business
On 2017-05-30 04:07, Alan Bourke wrote:
In 2017, how many users are looking for desktop apps?
Still plenty.
Just responded to Ed's post saying that a desktop UI still kicks ass
over a web page UI.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscript
On 2017-05-30 08:51, Edward Leafe wrote:
And yeah, it is 2017 now, and most of the demand I see is not only for
web-based apps, but also mobile-aware web apps. I’m sure that there
are people who still want desktop apps, but then again, there are
still people running Windows XP.
Yes, it seems
Desktop or web app, whichever, when your only tool is a hammer, everything
looks like a nail,
Fred
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Stephen Russell
wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Alan Bourke
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 30 May 2017, at 12:05 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> > > On Tue, Ma
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Alan Bourke
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 May 2017, at 12:05 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Alan Bourke
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > In 2017, how many users are looking for desktop apps?
> > >
> > > Still plenty.
> > >
> > >
> > Seriously?
> >
On Tue, 30 May 2017, at 12:05 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Alan Bourke
> wrote:
>
> > > In 2017, how many users are looking for desktop apps?
> >
> > Still plenty.
> >
> >
> Seriously?
>
>
Seriously. Anything that needs any sort of meaningful interaction with
On May 29, 2017, at 7:50 AM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
>
> I'm getting ready to do some Python learning on PluralSight.com
> <http://pluralsight.com/> and the dude mentioned PyQT for desktop
> applications.
>
> Ed & Paul (and other
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Alan Bourke
wrote:
> > In 2017, how many users are looking for desktop apps?
>
> Still plenty.
>
>
Seriously?
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN
901.246-0159 cell
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/a
> In 2017, how many users are looking for desktop apps?
Still plenty.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version
PyQT has 2 different licensing models which may complicate your decision
to go this route. PyQT has a fat distribution as well.
Other options for Python desktop apps are wxPython (Dabo's choice) and
Tkinter/ttk. While Tkinter/ttk often gets a bum rap, I've seen some cool
apps built with this GUI f
(Re-sending)
I'm getting ready to do some Python learning on PluralSight.com and the
dude mentioned PyQT for desktop applications.
Ed & Paul (and others) -- your thoughts on that? Was interested in your
take since you did Dabo for desktop applications with Python.
Thank
I'm getting ready to do some Python learning on PluralSight.com and the
dude mentioned PyQT for desktop applications.
Ed & Paul (and others) -- your thoughts on that? Was interested in your
take since you did Dabo for desktop applications with Python.
Thank
m] On Behalf Of Joe
> Yoder
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 March 2016 9:49 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: Suggestions for closing out simple applications?
>
> My application is so simple that it has no menu. Is there an advantage to
> having the clear events in a form rat
applications?
My application is so simple that it has no menu. Is there an advantage to
having the clear events in a form rather than directly following the read
events in the main program?
Also - what am I missing that would allow the command window to become
active after my forms close or is moving
applications?
My application is so simple that it has no menu. Is there an advantage to
having the clear events in a form rather than directly following the read
events in the main program?
Also - what am I missing that would allow the command window to become
active after my forms close or is moving
t;
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Joe Yoder wrote:
> >
> > > I have never used a framework and often just execute my stuff in the
> VFP
> > > environment. When I do an exe for others to use I am never sure what
> > > commands to include to shut things
to use I am never sure what
> > commands to include to shut things down. Sometimes I end up with
> > applications that can't be shut down without killing them in Task Manager
> > and sometimes I end up with code that forces me to re-execute "Modify
> > Project&q
Joe Yoder wrote:
> I have never used a framework and often just execute my stuff in the VFP
> environment. When I do an exe for others to use I am never sure what
> commands to include to shut things down. Sometimes I end up with
> applications that can't be shut down without k
I have never used a framework and often just execute my stuff in the VFP
environment. When I do an exe for others to use I am never sure what
commands to include to shut things down. Sometimes I end up with
applications that can't be shut down without killing them in Task Manager
and someti
You have the wrong friends on faceache :)
Al
-Original Message-
Plenty of discussion on Facebook if you ever feel the need . . .
Not much discussion of beer, oddly enough . . .
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www
On 01/14/2015 07:01 AM, Allen wrote:
That may well be the case Pete but these topics cause as many problems
between people as the items themselves, which is why there are places to
discuss them and not here.
Al
Plenty of discussion on Facebook if you ever feel the need . . .
Not much discussio
That may well be the case Pete but these topics cause as many problems
between people as the items themselves, which is why there are places to
discuss them and not here.
Al
-Original Message-
You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you . . .
--
Regards,
Pete
https:/
On 01/14/2015 06:02 AM, Allen wrote:
I actually like to hear some off topic. I miss the talk of Huskies and stuff
that people on the list do. What I don't miss is religion, Politics and War.
Al
You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you . . .
--
Regards,
Pete
https://www.fa
Well I think this one should go [OT] now and I fully accept that I
started it down the [OT] path!
Joking aside we should strive to keep the delineation working.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.c
I actually like to hear some off topic. I miss the talk of Huskies and stuff
that people on the list do. What I don't miss is religion, Politics and War.
Al
-Original Message-
Thank God the [OT] Police are no longer active . . .
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because
and crusty bread!
I am now at one with the world!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen
Sent: 13 January 2015 19:59
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] 5 Best Practices for Designing Data-Driven Applications
Don't know why I
one with the world!
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen
> Sent: 13 January 2015 19:59
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: [NF] 5 Best Practices for Designing Data-Driven Applications
>
&
om: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen
Sent: 13 January 2015 19:59
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] 5 Best Practices for Designing Data-Driven Applications
Don't know why I replied anyway. I'm more a wine drinker.
Al
-Original Message-
Let the b
That's it Matt - we've had enough of these types of mistakes from you -
Ed - its Time to Ban him!!!
:-)
-K-
On 1/12/2015 12:55 PM, M Jarvis wrote:
Oops guys - sorry about that. I meant to make this a private conversation
and I screwed it up. My apologies...
__
Ha - that's pretty funny - since, when I met Stephen in person - that's
EXACTLY what we did - Chat over beers - and he actually Edumacated me a
bit on the topic as well!
:-)
On 1/13/2015 3:17 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, at 05:55 PM, M Jarvis wrote:
Oops guys - sorry about th
surprised steve hasnt jumped in yet
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Allen wrote:
> Don't know why I replied anyway. I'm more a wine drinker.
> Al
>
> -Original Message-
>
> Let the beer wars begin
> Grin
>
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
Don't know why I replied anyway. I'm more a wine drinker.
Al
-Original Message-
Let the beer wars begin
Grin
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
___
Post Mes
Let the beer wars begin
Grin
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 13, 2015, at 1:43 PM, Allen wrote:
>
> Are you an old sailor that likes drinking their own pee?
> Al
>
> -Original Message-
>
> I'm out
> You got any Miller Lite to spare...
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses
Are you an old sailor that likes drinking their own pee?
Al
-Original Message-
I'm out
You got any Miller Lite to spare...
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
___
---
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 2:17 AM
> To: profox@leafe.com; profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] 5 Best Practices for Designing Data-Driven Applications
>
>
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, at 05:55 PM
ofoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] 5 Best Practices for Designing Data-Driven Applications
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, at 05:55 PM, M Jarvis wrote:
> Oops guys - sorry about that. I meant to make this a private
> conversation and I screwed it up. My apologies...
Well now let's not be hasty - yo
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Alan Bourke
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, at 05:55 PM, M Jarvis wrote:
> > Oops guys - sorry about that. I meant to make this a private conversation
> > and I screwed it up. My apologies...
>
> Well now let's not be hasty - you mentioned beer - pray continue ...
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
