That said...I do use buffering on those local cursors to allow me to
revert to what it was prior to my changes (as per the last query).
On 11/25/2019 5:29 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
All are saying the same thing...but I know I use the method Charlie
Coleman showed me probably 20 year
hat's basically it. But to be fair, I haven't
use DBFs in my designs since seeing Bob Lee's n-tier demo at WhilFest in
2002 or 2003. Prior to that, I used local VFP views (table-buffered)
for my apps.
On 11/25/2019 1:51 PM, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:
Table buffering is very common. Basi
Table buffering is very common. Basically all frameworks are using it.
Can't do any decent multiuser handling without it.
Yes you could do a simplier record-buffering mode, but as soon as you are faced
with the typical 1:n editform, then you would need to have tablebuffering
a
The couple systems I have left using dbfs use table buffering
On 25 November 2019 13:23:00 GMT-04:00, Matt Slay
wrote:
>For a while when my app was still on DBFs (instead of Sql Server) I
>used
>Table Buffering, with TableUpdate() and TableRevert() on all my CRUD
>forms. I reme
Matt,
I use Buffering=5 in my product as well.
Tracy
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Koen
Piller
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 12:28 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: How common is Table Buffering with DBFs??
Matt,
I
5 nov. 2019 om 18:23 schreef Matt Slay :
> For a while when my app was still on DBFs (instead of Sql Server) I used
> Table Buffering, with TableUpdate() and TableRevert() on all my CRUD
> forms. I remember that it could get tricky keeping it all working
> correctly in the UI, but i
For a while when my app was still on DBFs (instead of Sql Server) I used
Table Buffering, with TableUpdate() and TableRevert() on all my CRUD
forms. I remember that it could get tricky keeping it all working
correctly in the UI, but in the end I had a pretty good pattern in
place. I took the
you are unhurt that's all that matters!
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fred Taylor
> Sent: 21 August 2015 16:38
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: Table Buffering & FLUSH(ing the Toilet)!
&g
Fred,
Sorry to see the state of the car is it repairable?
As long as you are unhurt that's all that matters!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fred Taylor
Sent: 21 August 2015 16:38
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re:
Thanks John!
Fred
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:10 AM, John Weller
wrote:
> +1
>
> John Weller
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 21 Aug 2015, at 11:51, Dave Crozier wrote:
> >
> > On a completely different tack, Happy Birthday Fred from here in the UK
> and I guess all other Profoxers.
> >
> > Hav
Thanks Mike1
Fred
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:37 AM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> On 2015-08-21 06:51, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
>> On a completely different tack, Happy Birthday Fred from here in the
>> UK and I guess all other Profoxers.
>>
>> Have a great day!!!
>>
>> Da
Thanks Dave!
Fred
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> On a completely different tack, Happy Birthday Fred from here in the UK
> and I guess all other Profoxers.
>
> Have a great day!!!
>
> Dave
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
__
+1
John Weller
Sent from my iPhone
> On 21 Aug 2015, at 11:51, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
> On a completely different tack, Happy Birthday Fred from here in the UK and I
> guess all other Profoxers.
>
> Have a great day!!!
>
> Dave
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
On 2015-08-21 06:51, Dave Crozier wrote:
On a completely different tack, Happy Birthday Fred from here in the
UK and I guess all other Profoxers.
Have a great day!!!
Dave
+1
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http:/
On a completely different tack, Happy Birthday Fred from here in the UK and I
guess all other Profoxers.
Have a great day!!!
Dave
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
t...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Table Buffering & FLUSH(ing the Toilet)!
Kurt Wendt wrote on 2015-08-20:
> Hey Fred - Thanks for that input. I just spoke to my Manager about
> this
issue - and we both agreed that I may just stop doing the Table Buffering - and
that will help avoid the curr
Kurt Wendt wrote on 2015-08-20:
> Hey Fred - Thanks for that input. I just spoke to my Manager about this
issue - and we both agreed that I may just stop doing the Table Buffering -
and that will help avoid the current problem. But, before doing so - I will
try doing the TableUpdate() comm
Hey Fred - Thanks for that input. I just spoke to my Manager about this issue -
and we both agreed that I may just stop doing the Table Buffering - and that
will help avoid the current problem. But, before doing so - I will try doing
the TableUpdate() command. Understood about FLUSH not
Behalf Of Fred Taylor
Sent: 20 August 2015 16:50
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: Table Buffering & FLUSH(ing the Toilet)!
Sounds more like you're missing a TABLEUPDATE() somewhere. FLUSH won't commit
an uncommitted record.
Fred
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote
Sounds more like you're missing a TABLEUPDATE() somewhere. FLUSH won't
commit an uncommitted record.
Fred
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> So - this App I'm working on - I'm having an issue where a VFP error is
> being reported: Table...contains uncommitted changes.
>
> And
On 20/08/2015 16:42, Kurt Wendt wrote:
So - this App I'm working on - I'm having an issue where a VFP error is being
reported: Table...contains uncommitted changes.
And, the Buffering is on. There is code that's supposed to properly commit the
changes - but, it's not working.
What actual comm
ssage-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: 20 August 2015 16:43
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Table Buffering & FLUSH(ing the Toilet)!
So - this App I'm working on - I'm having an issue where a VFP error is being
reported: Table...contains
So - this App I'm working on - I'm having an issue where a VFP error is being
reported: Table...contains uncommitted changes.
And, the Buffering is on. There is code that's supposed to properly commit the
changes - but, it's not working. So - just now - I tried implementing the FLUSH
Command. B
Hi, this is not actually a "real" question given that I was able (due to
the app's characteristics) to go another way. But the question is still
bumping inside my head.
This is VFP 6.0, and there is no DBC for this app (though I guess I
could create it if necessary).
I have :
Flds.dbf :
Judith Barer wrote:
I realize that I do have to update more than one table. So I can use
table buffering but can I still use the SQL update, insert and delete
commands. It says the following in the help file on cursorsetprop
"Note Buffering is not applied to tables that are opened impli
I realize that I do have to update more than one table. So I can use
table buffering but can I still use the SQL update, insert and delete
commands. It says the following in the help file on cursorsetprop
"Note Buffering is not applied to tables that are opened implicitly,
for example,
Judith Barer wrote:
I have developed a VFP 8.0 app with table buffering used in most of the
forms. This all works fine. I use transactions and tableupdate and
it's working fine. I have to write a program that will read in an xml
file every day and update appropriate records in a table th
I have developed a VFP 8.0 app with table buffering used in most of the
forms. This all works fine. I use transactions and tableupdate and
it's working fine. I have to write a program that will read in an xml
file every day and update appropriate records in a table that is used in
the mai
28 matches
Mail list logo
