[Proto-Scripty] Try.these deprecated?

2011-06-30 Thread Rick Witter
According to the documentation Try.these has been deprecated. Is this right? It's still being used in the Ajax class. The change was in this checkin: https://github.com/sstephenson/prototype/commit/f12b83ef236a54306c7f686ae4c1c45910e2fc57#src/lang.js rick -- You received this message

[Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-06-30 Thread Walter Lee Davis
I have been chasing my tail on a slow script error, and just now discovered that if I disable my call to make a 1,000 element list sortable the problem goes entirely away. First, is there any sort of tool I can use to determine where this function is spending all of its time? Second, is

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-06-30 Thread Phil Petree
Walter, I had the timeout problem on a script with a different purpose. What I did was hijacked the code here: http://www.mcfedries.com/JavaScript/timer.asp I created an array: var funcTimers[] and then modified the above code to insert into the array and each func started the timer on entry

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-06-30 Thread Walter Lee Davis
Thanks very much for the offer. I seem to have fixed it here, but the problem wasn't specifically in Sortable. What I ended up doing was staggering some of the Ajax loading events that were also happening while that function fired using setTimeout and that got around the problem.

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-06-30 Thread Richard Quadling
On 30 June 2011 15:41, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote: Thanks very much for the offer. I seem to have fixed it here, but the problem wasn't specifically in Sortable. What I ended up doing was staggering some of the Ajax loading events that were also happening while that function

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-06-30 Thread Phil Petree
Ah yes.. the stacked ajax calls... kill ya every time! Glad you got it working! On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.comwrote: Thanks very much for the offer. I seem to have fixed it here, but the problem wasn't specifically in Sortable. What I ended up doing was

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Sortable with 1,000 elements?

2011-06-30 Thread Walter Lee Davis
On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Richard Quadling wrote: I use http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/sorttable/ -- Richard Quadling Twitter : EE : Zend : PHPDoc @RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY : bit.ly/lFnVea Thanks, that's completely a different thing from what I'm

[Proto-Scripty] Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv

2011-06-30 Thread Jonny Nott
Using html5shiv 1.6.2 (latest) (http://code.google.com/p/html5shiv/) and Prototype v1.7.. So, html5shiv makes article, section etc elements work nicely in IE9 .. they appear, you can style them etc. All good. The HTML5 elements all exist within the IE DOM tree in Developer Tools. However, when

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv

2011-06-30 Thread Walter Lee Davis
On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Jonny Nott wrote: Using html5shiv 1.6.2 (latest) (http://code.google.com/p/html5shiv/) and Prototype v1.7.. So, html5shiv makes article, section etc elements work nicely in IE9 .. they appear, you can style them etc. All good. The HTML5 elements all exist within

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv

2011-06-30 Thread Jonny Nott
I *think* this is exactly what html5shiv is doing. Could try adding your suggestion into the test HTML on pastebin, but I'm not at my computer right now :( -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv

2011-06-30 Thread Walter Lee Davis
One thought, is HTML5shiv loading before or after Prototype? Walter On Jun 30, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Jonny Nott wrote: I *think* this is exactly what html5shiv is doing. Could try adding your suggestion into the test HTML on pastebin, but I'm not at my computer right now :( -- You received

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv

2011-06-30 Thread T.J. Crowder
On Jun 30, 5:44 pm, Jonny Nott jonn...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] Is this a gaping hole/bug? I'm sure the core folks have thick skins, but was gaping _really_ necessary? On Jun 30, 6:57 pm, Jonny Nott jonn...@gmail.com wrote: I *think* this is exactly what html5shiv is doing. Could try adding

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv

2011-06-30 Thread Jonny Nott
Aha, Mr Crowder, you always have the answers! Thanks. So, any news on Prototype v 1.7.0.1, 1.7.1 or 1.8? Will the next version have the latest Sizzle in? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv

2011-06-30 Thread Jonny Nott
Thanks Mr Crowder! You the man, as always.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype DOM-traversal methods failing on HTML5 elements in IE 9 using html5shiv

2011-06-30 Thread Jonny Nott
So, any news on Prototype 1.7.0.1, 1.7.1 or 1.8? Assuming it'll have the latest sizzlejs included? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To