Re: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
That would be a good reason. LOL! Chris. - Original Message - From: "Poppa Bear" To: Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 6:23 PM Subject: RE: 2011 Mack mini I came across a specific Mack mini from somebody I know who is hurting for money right now and I could possibly

RE: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread Poppa Bear
:41 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 2011 Mack mini Why not go for a mac mini server? That way you could have a quad core I7 processor and two internal drives right off the bat... On 2/20/15, Poppa Bear wrote: > Thanks guys, you guys basically covered my questions. > >

Re: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread Nick Gawronski
drive with Mavericks 10.9.5. Chris. - Original Message - *From:* Poppa Bear <mailto:heavens4r...@gmail.com> *To:* ptaccess@googlegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com> *Sent:* Friday, February 20, 2015 4:56 AM *Subject:* 2011 Mack mini I am think

Re: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Awesome! Glad to hear! Chris. - Original Message - From: Poppa Bear To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 11:40 AM Subject: RE: 2011 Mack mini Thanks guys, you guys basically covered my questions. From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com

Re: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread Cameron Strife
egroups.com] On Behalf > Of Christopher-Mark Gilland > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 2:42 AM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: 2011 Mack mini > > > > I literally have identically the same exact system, and identically the same > exact specs you mention here

RE: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread Poppa Bear
Thanks guys, you guys basically covered my questions. From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Christopher-Mark Gilland Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 2:42 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 2011 Mack mini I literally have identically the

Re: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
You know what, you're right. I don't usually use the item chooser. Sometimes I do, but it's rare. Perhaps I should get more in the habbit of it. LOL! Chris. - Original Message - From: "mcdiemert ." To: Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:37 AM Subject: Re

Re: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread mcdiemert .
ylists at most, not including my final conf track that I use > > in the final master mix. > > Again, hope you're well. > > Write me off list some time. Let's catch up! > > Chris. > > - Original Message ----- > From: "mcdiemert ." > To: >

Re: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
Write me off list some time. Let's catch up! Chris. - Original Message - From: "mcdiemert ." To: Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:22 AM Subject: Re: 2011 Mack mini I used one of these for my first couple of years in PT, and the only thing I found was the ram neede

Re: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread mcdiemert .
>> I am thinking about picking up a 2011 Mack mini with a 500 GB drive, I5, >> and 8 Gb ram to use as a backup recording daw. Is anyone using this kind >> of set up right now? I had a friend who used it with PT 8 successfully but >> he wasn't into using busses, sends a

Re: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread TheOreoMonster
I wouldn’t worry about the Internal HD. If yo are going to upgrade it but an SSD in there and then use the 500GB drive for a second drive and then a external drive won’t always be needed. > On Feb 20, 2015, at 4:56 AM, Poppa Bear wrote: > > I am thinking about picking up a 2011

Re: 2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
es at all. I'm using an I5, 8 GB ram, and the internal stocked 500GB hard drive with Mavericks 10.9.5. Chris. - Original Message - From: Poppa Bear To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 4:56 AM Subject: 2011 Mack mini I am thinking about pi

2011 Mack mini

2015-02-20 Thread Poppa Bear
I am thinking about picking up a 2011 Mack mini with a 500 GB drive, I5, and 8 Gb ram to use as a backup recording daw. Is anyone using this kind of set up right now? I had a friend who used it with PT 8 successfully but he wasn't into using busses, sends and a lot of plug ins. I would upgra