Re: question about playing back a pro tools session I got from school recorded in pro tools 8 HD

2014-02-04 Thread Nick Gawronski
10 to see if it works or is there a method for finding out what audio files are for what track by looking at the session file as there are numbered files for each track like bass01.wav and bass02.wav? Can a pro tools 8 or 11 session be reversed so you can tell what files it uses for each

Re: question about playing back a pro tools session I got from school recorded in pro tools 8 HD

2014-02-03 Thread TheOreoMonster
y looking at the session file as there >> are numbered files for each track like bass01.wav and bass02.wav? Can a pro >> tools 8 or 11 session be reversed so you can tell what files it uses for >> each track outside of pro tools? Nick Gawronski >> On 2/2/2014 8:15 PM, Slau

Re: question about playing back a pro tools session I got from school recorded in pro tools 8 HD

2014-02-02 Thread Slau Halatyn
o see if it works or is there a method for finding out > what audio files are for what track by looking at the session file as there > are numbered files for each track like bass01.wav and bass02.wav? Can a pro > tools 8 or 11 session be reversed so you can tell what files it uses for each

Re: question about playing back a pro tools session I got from school recorded in pro tools 8 HD

2014-02-02 Thread Nick Gawronski
? Can a pro tools 8 or 11 session be reversed so you can tell what files it uses for each track outside of pro tools? Nick Gawronski On 2/2/2014 8:15 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Did you delete your output paths in the I/O Setup dialog and create new default paths? Slau On Feb 2, 2014, at 8:56 PM

Re: question about playing back a pro tools session I got from school recorded in pro tools 8 HD

2014-02-02 Thread Slau Halatyn
M, Poppa Bear wrote: >> >>> Slau, could it be a resolution issue? I can't remember if the 003 only >>> supports up to 96KHZ play back. >>> - Original Message - From: "Slau Halatyn" >>> To: >>> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014

Re: question about playing back a pro tools session I got from school recorded in pro tools 8 HD

2014-02-02 Thread Nick Gawronski
wrote: Slau, could it be a resolution issue? I can't remember if the 003 only supports up to 96KHZ play back. - Original Message - From: "Slau Halatyn" To: Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 1:58 PM Subject: Re: question about playing back a pro tools session I got from s

Re: question about playing back a pro tools session I got from school recorded in pro tools 8 HD

2014-02-02 Thread Slau Halatyn
-- From: "Slau Halatyn" > To: > Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 1:58 PM > Subject: Re: question about playing back a pro tools session I got from > school recorded in pro tools 8 HD > > > I'd suggest the following: > > Go into your I/O Setup, press Com

Re: question about playing back a pro tools session I got from school recorded in pro tools 8 HD

2014-02-02 Thread Poppa Bear
they recorded it on pro tools 8 HD and have now upgraded to 10. When I try to open up the session all of the outputs are set to different outputs on my digi 003 and no matter what I do no audio plays. I can see the wav files and select each one and play them back normally but would like to be ab

Re: question about playing back a pro tools session I got from school recorded in pro tools 8 HD

2014-02-02 Thread Slau Halatyn
, use the Option modifier with a click to set all track outputs to the same selection and choose your main stereo outputs. Slau On Feb 2, 2014, at 5:39 PM, Nick Gawronski wrote: > Hi, I was given a pro tools session by one of my instructors to mess around > with but they recorded it on

question about playing back a pro tools session I got from school recorded in pro tools 8 HD

2014-02-02 Thread Nick Gawronski
Hi, I was given a pro tools session by one of my instructors to mess around with but they recorded it on pro tools 8 HD and have now upgraded to 10. When I try to open up the session all of the outputs are set to different outputs on my digi 003 and no matter what I do no audio plays. I can

Re: Pro tools 8?

2012-04-09 Thread Slau Halatyn
8.0.1 is not accessible. Some dialogs are and the menus are generally readable but none of the normal windows are accessible with VoiceOver. Slau On Apr 9, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Nick Gawronski wrote: > Hi, My school is in the process of upgrading and currently they are using pro > tools 8.01 it i

Re: Pro tools 8?

2012-04-09 Thread Nick Gawronski
Hi, My school is in the process of upgrading and currently they are using pro tools 8.01 it is hd and voiceover won't read much even when it is on and able to read the pro tools window I can never get to the track list or even to lots of the menus with the normal commands like I can on my own s

Re: Pro tools 8?

2012-04-09 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
: Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 10:10 AM Subject: Re: Pro tools 8? I don't know what your impression of outSPOKEN is but it was an exceptional screen reader. The level of accessibility with many applications was in some respects far better than what we sometimes see with VoiceOver. It wasn&#x

Re: Pro tools 8?

2012-04-09 Thread Slau Halatyn
t, but compared to what we have now... > > It's amazing! to think just in 20 years how far we've come! > > Chris. > > - Original Message - From: "Slau Halatyn" > To: > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 9:48 AM > Subject: Re: Pro tools 8? > >

Re: Pro tools 8?

2012-04-09 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
e have now... It's amazing! to think just in 20 years how far we've come! Chris. - Original Message - From: "Slau Halatyn" To: Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 9:48 AM Subject: Re: Pro tools 8? Yes, but it was only accessible up until Pro Tools required OS X at v

Re: Pro tools 8?

2012-04-09 Thread Slau Halatyn
AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland wrote: > I thought PT was accessible even before that. OK, granted, you had to use > Outspoken... > > Am I remembering wrong? > > Chris. > > - Original Message - From: "Slau Halatyn" > To: > Sent: Monday, April 09,

Re: Pro tools 8?

2012-04-09 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
I thought PT was accessible even before that. OK, granted, you had to use Outspoken... Am I remembering wrong? Chris. - Original Message - From: "Slau Halatyn" To: Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 8:03 AM Subject: Re: Pro tools 8? Yep, version 8.0.4 is the first. Any

Re: Pro tools 8?

2012-04-09 Thread Slau Halatyn
Yep, version 8.0.4 is the first. Anyone with 8 could upgrade for free to all versions of 8.x. HTH, Slau On Apr 9, 2012, at 6:58 AM, The Oreo Monster wrote: > If i Remember correctly, accessibility wasn't until version 8.04 and up right? > - T.O.M > > On Apr 9, 2012, at 2:42 AM, Kevin Reeves w

Re: Pro tools 8?

2012-04-09 Thread The Oreo Monster
If i Remember correctly, accessibility wasn't until version 8.04 and up right? - T.O.M On Apr 9, 2012, at 2:42 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote: > 8 is indeed accessible. There are really no noticeable differences between 8 > and 9 for accessibility. However, the advantage that 9 offers is the ability >

Re: Pro tools 8?

2012-04-08 Thread Kevin Reeves
8 is indeed accessible. There are really no noticeable differences between 8 and 9 for accessibility. However, the advantage that 9 offers is the ability to use Pro TOols with any audio device.

Re: Pro tools 8?

2012-04-08 Thread Christopher-Mark Gilland
>From what I heard, it was. It wasn't near as full on as V9, by any stretch, >but... Why would anyone want V8 though, anyway? Chris. - Original Message - From: Poppa Bear To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 1:53 AM Subject: Pro tools 8?

Pro tools 8?

2012-04-08 Thread Poppa Bear
Is pro tools 8 accessible with Voice over, or just 9 and up? I don't want to pass on the wrong information to anyone. Thanks Nate Kile, Cross Road Recording Studios, specializing in Mixing, Mastering and all your audio needs. www.crossroadrecording.com