nts can be either posted here, or sent to the dedicated W3C mailing list
public-dwbp-comme...@w3.org.
The three co-editors (cc'ed) are also willing to receive personal emails,
should you not be sure that your feedback is fit for open publication!
Kind regards,
Antoine Isaac
--
R&D Manager, Europeana.eu
Dear Cristina,
There's a set of three thesauri that have been manually mapped by the MACS
project:
- LCSH (at id.loc.gov)
- Rameau (at data.bnf.fr)
- SWD (see
https://wiki.dnb.de/display/LDS/Dokumentation+des+Linked+Data+Services+der+DNB)
These are not complete wrt coverage of the vocabularies
Dear all,
This is a bottle at the sea...
We've started a couple of emails about translating the SKOS RDF OWL ontology,
after the official spec has been released, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2013Jul/0029.html
I'm not sure what the best way to do it. In the past (200
On 6/24/13 4:22 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 9:12 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
On 6/24/13 2:44 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 6:23 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Dominic,
I agree with the relevance of the effort, and wouldn't argue against
centralizing. Not everyone will hav
On 6/24/13 2:44 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/24/13 6:23 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Dominic,
I agree with the relevance of the effort, and wouldn't argue against
centralizing. Not everyone will have the resource to search in a decentralized
fashion...
What worries me a bit is h
Hi Andreas, Prateek,
Very good points that you make about trust and domains.
In fact specific domains like the biology one or the culture one (see
lodlam.net) try to address these issues in much more specific terms and
business models that what would be discussed on this public-lod list.
So may
Hi Dominic,
I agree with the relevance of the effort, and wouldn't argue against
centralizing. Not everyone will have the resource to search in a decentralized
fashion...
What worries me a bit is how to learn lessons for the past. As you (or someone
else) has pointed, there have been previous
s to belong to another skos:ConceptScheme ...
Bernard
2012/8/29 Dave Reynolds mailto:dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com>>
On 28/08/12 20:39, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Sorry, my owl:someValuesFrom should have been owl:allValuesFrom, I
guess.
Actually I think owl:someValuesFrom is right thou
x27;t know it but you are".
Think I even know it.
Best regards,
Thomas
[1] http://innoq.github.com/led/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/
[3] https://github.com/innoq/iqvoc/
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/#L1101
Am 22.08.2012 21:15, schrieb Antoine Isaac:
Dear Thom
://innoq.github.com/led/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/
[3] https://github.com/innoq/iqvoc/
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/#L1101
Am 22.08.2012 21:15, schrieb Antoine Isaac:
Dear Thomas,
I'm ccing public-esw-t...@w3.org. Perhaps this was the one you were
Dear Thomas,
I'm ccing public-esw-t...@w3.org. Perhaps this was the one you were looking for!
(1) & (2)
You probably mean, if a ConceptScheme could be defined as a class, of which the
concepts of a given concept scheme are instances?
That would be the way to proceed, if you want to use the conc
On 6/8/12 1:53 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 6 Jun 2012, at 14:04, Antoine Isaac wrote:
By the way, I've tried to update our DataHub entry at
http://thedatahub.org/dataset/stitch-rameau, fitting "decommissioned"
somewhere. I've just added it as a tag for now, I did
Hi Leigh, Bradley, Rufus,
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Bradley Allen wrote:
Leigh- This is great. The question that comes up for me out of what you've
written for unpublishing brings me back to Antoine's question: is it
appropriate to use a relation other than owl:sameAs that more specifi
added value once you are gone.
I don't know if CKAN has that facility.
For total extra kudos, provide query rewriting rules
from yours site to LoC data, linked so that you can write a program
to start with a sparql query which fails
and figures out from metadata how to
On 5/31/12 4:20 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 31 May 2012, at 09:02, Rufus Pollock wrote:
You can definitely keep the dataset entry on CKAN there. We don't have
it now but one could introduce a special state of "archived" which
would then mean that the entry was kept but clearly marked as
archi
<http://t4gm.info> instead
respond with a 301 redirection to the equivalent id.loc.gov <http://id.loc.gov>
resource when that exists, else respond with a 410 error. - regards, BPA
Bradley P. Allen
http://bradleypallen.org
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Antoine Isaac mailto:ais...@
But I guess that if we had decided to shut done our server altogether
I mean, shut down our vocabulary server, which handles the queries for data on individual
concepts. Which would leave us with just the ability to serve a same answer for the
entire "domain"...
Antoine
Dear Bradley,
The
Dear Bradley,
The second part of your plan reminds me of my recent question on "moving" a
dataset
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2012Apr/0123.html
The object moved (a thesaurus) is quite the same, as the cause for the
"moving": in both cases an official version has arisen to re
Hi Dominic,
I understand the need to be careful. The email was a bit of a whim at the end
of the day. However, I would argue that we are not an isolated node we have
simply used ontology has the linking method and we have a very high level of
linkage (or harmonisation) with our partners who
at
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/XGR-lld-vocabdataset/#Library_Linked_Data_at_CKAN
are indeed "isolated", in the LOD cloud sense.
Antoine
On 22 May 2012, at 08:42, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Dominic,
I guess that it was with the LOD *cloud* that you had issues. It looks a bit
s
Hi Dominic,
I guess that it was with the LOD *cloud* that you had issues. It looks a bit
severe, but I think I understand the motivations: if the cloud admitted
isolated nodes, it would have many of them, and that would look weird... But of
course that does not make your contribution less inte
Hi Christian,
I guess by now you should have received enough links :-)
Many of them are actually findable by starting from the official SKOS site at
W3C: http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/
By the way http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/SKOS/Datasets seems not to work at
the time I'm writing this email
ves/Public/public-lod/2012May/0032.html
Hi Antoine,
On 23 Apr 2012, at 21:41, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hi Hugh,
It seems that
http://sameas.org/store/kelle/?uri=http://stitch.cs.vu.nl/vocabularies/rameau/ark:/12148/cb14521343b
already has the owl:sameAs to http://data.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb1452134
Hugh
On 20 Apr 2012, at 14:11, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Thanks a lot for your feedback! That's really precious.
@Richard, Jon: yes, we'll try to have the 301 working for a while. But not
forever, so it would be good if something could function as a more stable
solution. Though I
Hi Bernard,
Indeed there is a bit of trust from the STITCH side: we believe than whatever was at stitch:x will
be found at bnf:x. And we're talking about one same concept, yes: it's not one "new"
concept replacing an "old" one. It is an identity change, so to say.
If there's a change to that c
t between the prototype URIs and the production ones,
so that a client searching for data on the old URI gets data that enables it to
make the connection with the original resource (URI) it was seeking data about.
Does that seem ok? What should we do, otherwise?
Thanks for any feedback you cou
a about.
Does that seem ok? What should we do, otherwise?
Thanks for any feedback you could have,
Antoine Isaac (VU Amsterdam side)
Romain Wenz (BnF side)
[1] RAMEAU is a vocabulary (thesaurus) used by the National Library of France
(BnF) for describing books.
Dear all (apologies for cross-posting)
data.europeana.eu has already existed for several months, but I thought it
could be useful to share the following re-release with you, since all the
metadata there is now CC0.
We of course wish to release even more in the coming months. We hope in the
mea
Hi,
Which side effects are probable ?
Giovanni has made the same comment on data.europeana.eu a couple of
weeks ago. The data we serve there is different from the RDFa mark-up
on our web portal.
We had some reasons to do this, including, well, that the RDFa data is
mixing the info and non-in
Yann, Giovanni,
Which side effects are probable ?
Giovanni has made the same comment on data.europeana.eu a couple of weeks ago.
The data we serve there is different from the RDFa mark-up on our web portal.
We had some reasons to do this, including, well, that the RDFa data is mixing
the i
[apologies for cross-posting]
--
W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group
CALL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group
(http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/)
has been chartered from
Please excuse cross-posting
DCMI EXTENDS DC-2011 SUBMISSION DEADLINE to 30 APRIL 2011
=
DC-2011 Call for Papers
=
International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications:
"Metadata Harmoniz
--
Apologies for Cross-posting
=
DC-2011 Call for Papers
=
International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications:
"Metadata Harmonization: Bridging Languages of Descrip
** apologies for cross-postings **
The Open Bibliographic Data Working Group of the Open Knowledge
Foundation has published a set of principles for open bibliographic
data. [1] These principles express a philosophy of openness for
bibliographic data in support of research and knowledge enhancemen
Dear Daniel,
Adding to the feedback you've already received...
The vocabulary that Europeana is planning to use in its RDF/linked data
activities is at [1].
You were given quite some pointers to museums, let me give some on libraries
:-) -- we're going to see more and more interaction between
in advance for your time,
Emmanuelle Bermes (Emmanuelle.Bermes_bnf.fr), Alexander Haffner
(A.Haffner_d-nb.de),
Antoine Isaac (aisaac_few.vu.nl) and Jodi Schneider (jodi.schneider_deri.org)
[1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UCCuratio
Anja, Richard, (ccing the Library Linked Data list)
Really great work! Adding to Rinke's comment, I'm also happily surprised by the coherence that you still can
give to the various parts of the LOD cloud: the colored version is really fascinating to see [1]. Our core
"library linked data" core
On 9/22/10 1:18 AM, Toby Inkster wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:45:07 +0200
Antoine Isaac wrote:
Very interesting! I'm curious though: what's the application scenario
that made you create this version?
It makes it easy to insult people in RDF.
<#you> a wordnet:F
Hi Ed,
Great job!
And again it might be showing some (minor) issues in the data harvested for BTC
-- probably not BTC organizers' fault, cf our discussion at [1].
By complete chance I spotted a small bibsonomy.org node attached to
semanticweb.org through dblp.l3s.de. But there is also a www.bi
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:30:52 +0100
Ian Davis wrote:
This is based on the RDF conversion at
http://semanticweb.cs.vu.nl/lod/wn30/
How similar is your work to this version?
They're similar in that they're both based on Wordnet 3. There are some
key differences though:
1. The vu.nl version in
in advance for your time,
Emmanuelle Bermes (Emmanuelle.Bermes_bnf.fr), Alexander Haffner
(A.Haffner_d-nb.de),
Antoine Isaac (aisaac_few.vu.nl) and Jodi Schneider (jodi.schneider_deri.org)
[1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UCCuratio
Hi Bernard,
Sorry for the late answer.
As a matter of fact an updated version of the manually-built gold standard that
we have used for [2] has been just now made available as linked data
(skos:closeMatch statements), both at the prototype site for the French RAMEAU
subject headings [3] and a
--- Apologies for cross-postings ---
21 May 2010
W3C is pleased to announce the creation of the Library Linked Data Incubator
Group [1], whose mission is to help increase global interoperability of library
data on the Web, by bringing together people involved in Semantic Web
activities - focu
On 2/14/10 5:58 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
On Feb 14, 2010, at 4:34 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
Im not sure what you mean by 'stable identity',
It's a slightly (possibly unorthodox) viewpoint I take during RDF
editing: With a container, you can say "I will edit the sequence at
URI X" and be sure t
Hello Monika
My turn to add some stuff to the list! But I have a wide scope for what
cultural heritage material could be ;-)
First, there's Libris, a really important work at the Swedish library [1].
Also in the library world, two big vocabularies (the American LCSH [2] and
French RAMEAU [3])
the different skos:match properties -- so one
can steer clear of owl:sameAs and avoid most of the usual coreference
problems.
Yes!
Antoine
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/#secindexing
On 3 Dec 2009, at 18:58, Antoine Isaac wrote:
And in fact, while I understand that it is not very i
Hi Richard,
On 2 Dec 2009, at 16:36, Antoine Isaac wrote:
On 2 Dec 2009, at 02:40, Peter DeVries wrote:
I was thinking that the species itself should be a class so that
individuals
of that species would be instances of that class.
Probably another skos:Concept class.
So an individual
Hi Richard,
On 2 Dec 2009, at 02:40, Peter DeVries wrote:
I was thinking that the species itself should be a class so that
individuals
of that species would be instances of that class.
Probably another skos:Concept class.
So an individual species concept class like that for the Cougar would
e to the Catalog
of Life.
So the 2010 CoL LSID for the Cougar will be different than the 2009 CoL
LSID.
It is for this reason that I made the ubioLSID a skos:relatedMatch while
having the CoL LSID a skos:closeMatch.
Does that seem to make sense?
Thanks for your interest :-)
- Pete
On Tue, D
Hi Peter (ccing the SKOS list, as this is a SKOS implementation, after all :-)
I also think that's really a cool effort, with a great potential!
My question would be about your choices wrt. the use of relatedMatch and
closeMatch: why do we have
http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/ses/v6n7p skos:related
Hi Kingsley, Alexandre, others
The thread has become quite hard to follow (I cannot really see what refers to
the existing situation and what is proposed as the solution to be implemented)
, but I'll try to help where I can ;-)
consider the fact, that sparqling for skos:broaderTransitive does
Alexandre Passant a écrit :
Hi,
On 8 Oct 2009, at 16:09, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
The intersection of Leigh Dodds SPARQL extensions survey [1], imminent
official release of Virtuoso 6.0 (DBpedia basic and Live already use
this, ditto LOD Cache, and B3S public endpoints), and an old post
ow, does that still make it meaningless to introduce it? Well, it does correspond to existing practices, and is used in a lot of data out there, which can be exploited in a large number of interesting scenarios...
Best,
Antoine
On Jul 23, 2009, at 4:24 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
Hello,
Tryin
Hello,
Trying to add some explanation wrt. the SKOS vocabulary, hoping not to conflict
with Pat's clarifications ;-)
For skos:exactMatch, the SKOS reference says [1]:
The property skos:exactMatch is used to link two concepts, indicating a high
degree of confidence that the concepts can be use
Kingsley Idehen a écrit :
Antoine Isaac wrote:
Dear all,
I'd like to announce the release an *experimental* service [1] that
provides the RAMEAU subject headings as open linked data.
Rameau [2] is the main subject vocabulary used at the French national
library (BnF) and many other F
in the
future!
For more information, please visit [1] or contact aisaac at few.vu.nl.
Thanks a lot for your attention,
Antoine
[1] http://stitch.cs.vu.nl/rameau
[2] http://rameau.bnf.fr
[3] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub
[5] http://macs.cenl.org
works used, details of the SKOS
constructs which are supported, any other URLs describing the software
or providing further information.
Kind regards,
Alistair Miles and Antoine Isaac
on behalf of the W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
57 matches
Mail list logo