Hi Dan,
I think this is a good start. As others
have suggested, we need to drill down further to understand our requirements
and
evaluate the need for representing RIM in
OWL.. Some suggestions of deepening the use case are as follows:
"An
RDF system has been put in place to navigat
What you begin to confront is the fact that if the ontologies were
isolated both in terms of not using a shared foundational ontology, there were
likely also isolated in the sense of not sharing "best practices" for
ontology construction:
-
many definitions ar
Dear Bill et al.,
Thanks for the articles and the explanation. I agree that we should
consider mutliple brain regions in the case of Parkinson's Disease (as
well as other neurological diseases). I just gave a specific example
(purkinje cell is located in cerebellum). There are other types of
Vipul,
Not trying to self-promote. But I have designed a visual
langauge that is targeted specifically at the RDF/OWL based ontology
formalism. It is extensible and self-descriptive (i.e., you can define
your own notations for specific concept). If you are interested, you might give
it a
Ivan,
I'll try to work with Topaz team to further understand their
requirements for ontology and semantic representation of
publication.
-ajOn 9/4/06, Ivan Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AJ,this sounds really good. It would be great if, once they really have itrolling, we would have a good des
*/So at this stage, we are not committing to any UML semantics, we are
just using it for the visualization facilities./*
*/I would be happy to switch to another OWL-based tool which offers the
visualization capabilities offered by Visio… Any suggestions?/*
Vipul,
if you are interested in a
Hi, Vipul
Thanks for putting a head start on this
task.
I have one observation on expressing
ontology in UML notation.
As we know that UML and ontology language
in semantic web (RDF and OWL) are based on very different theory, although
the hierarchical structures of OWL classes and UML class
Absolutely, thanks Kei!Though - for Parkison's - we're going to need to deal with neurons in the substantia nigra and the locus coeruleus. For instance, see:Relationship among alpha-synuclein accumulation, dopamine synthesis, and neurodegeneration in Parkinson disease substantia nigra.Mori F, Nish
Helen,
Thanks for bringing these issues up:
I have one observation on
expressing ontology in UML notation.
As
we know that UML and ontology language in semantic web (RDF and OWL) are based
on very different theory, although the hierarchical structures of OWL classes
and UML cl
Thanks, Kei Cheung!
This is one of the design issues I had raised. The issue of granularity is a
very important one, and you have provided an interesting use case.
Regards,
---Vipul
===
Vipul Kashyap, Ph.D.
Senior Medical Informatician
Clinical Informatics R
Hi Vipul, Bill et al.,
Thanks for your efforts. I think the seed (global) ontology is a good
start. I'd also suggest to include modeling at the neuronal level that
allows study of neuronal properties that are involved in Parkinson
Disease. For example, the following OWL ontology
For the time being, I have uploaded the JPEG
and GIF versions of the Ontology in UML.
---Vipul
From: William Bug
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006
12:01 AM
To: Kashyap, Vipul
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: [BIONT]
Teleconference on
ACPP weekly tcon today:
3:00pm-4:00pmEST
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 2277 ("ACPP")
Zakim didn't give us proper access in
the past two weeks. I have send the request again to admin, and hope
this time it will work properly. If you get "access restricted"
again this time, please cal
13 matches
Mail list logo
