To expand on this, we're starting integration now with pulp3 and file
repositories. I don't have a good estimation for how long it will take,
but my goal is ~2 months (so more likely 3 or 4 months). This should
give us a good estimation for how difficult it will be add future
content types
To give kind of an update on integrating Katello and Pulp 3, I don’t think
there has been much to report since the fall. Since then, Pulp has been
focusing on finishing up the Pulp 3 RC features (which included some things
Katello needed like lazy sync) while Katello has been refactoring parts of
The long RC is, in-part, to ensure that Pulp 3.0.0 is fully usable for
Katello. Related to that, one question I keep wondering is: when will Pulp3
land in an upstream Katello release and for which plugins? I've lost touch
with that conversation so I have no idea what to expect. I believe Pulp3
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:45 AM Bryan Kearney wrote:
>
>> -- pulp-list
>>
>> RC for a year? That seems way long. I get the idea of semanti=c
>> versioning, but is there any other path for that?
>>
>>
We haven't really discussed this idea, so this is just me talking:
Another possible path
I agree. I think a year though is highly unlikely. It’s kind of hard to
predict right now because we don’t have a concrete roadmap for what needs
to be done for Pulp 3 GA. Once we release the RC (or perhaps before), we’ll
develop a milestone/roadmap for GA which should give us a better idea of
how
-- pulp-list
RC for a year? That seems way long. I get the idea of semanti=c
versioning, but is there any other path for that?
--bk
On 1/30/19 5:28 PM, David Davis wrote:
> We’re approaching an RC release of Pulp 3.0 and we’ve put together a
> blog post with some information about this release:
