.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Christian Flamm"
> > To: puppet-dev@googlegroups.com
> > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 12:04:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Puppet-dev] ruby-1.9.3 in yum.puppetlabs.com
> >
> > Hey Dominic,
&g
- Original Message -
> From: "Christian Flamm"
> To: puppet-dev@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 12:04:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [Puppet-dev] ruby-1.9.3 in yum.puppetlabs.com
>
> Hey Dominic,
>
>
> > However I don't see t
Hey Dominic,
> However I don't see that this has much to do with the original bug,
> which was more luck than design that it was fixed in 1.9.3... it's not
> worth investigating 1.9.3 support via packages just to provide a
> workaround for that issue! Charlie's last response is spot on.
>
W
On 25/07/13 16:21, Justin Lambert wrote:
> For RHEL derivatives one option might be Redhat's Software Collections.
> They have added Ruby 1.9.3 support to RHEL through that. I have
> testing it out on my todo list, but haven't made it that far yet. I'm
> not quickly finding a link to the actual
Done.
2013/7/26 Trevor Vaughan
> http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/21950
>
> Please upvote.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Christian Flamm <
> christian.le.fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "*I imagine if people actually start using this, they'll want more
>> packages built out with depe
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/21950
Please upvote.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Christian Flamm <
christian.le.fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "*I imagine if people actually start using this, they'll want more
> packages built out with dependencies on these rubies. That's fine. You can
>
"*I imagine if people actually start using this, they'll want more packages
built out with dependencies on these rubies. That's fine. You can file
issues, or issue a pull request on elruby and I'll try to get those built
out.*"
Let me quickly file an issue :-D
Am Freitag, 26. Juli 2013 06:07:3
There is always http://elruby.websages.com.
I am the guy behind that. I needed different rubies for lots of
projects I was working on and just decided to make them public.
Disclaimers:
1. I am not always super fast if there are updates (or CVEs). My job
is to keep Puppet Labs stuff updated, not
As Justin Lambert mentioned, Software Collections may be a good option
for you. Here's a quick intro to software collections on cent/rhel 6:
http://developerblog.redhat.com/2013/01/28/software-collections-on-red-hat-enterprise-linux/
. I haven't tried this, but looking at the ruby193 repo they
refe
Hi Christian,
Here's a reasonable means of going about building 1.9.3 RPMs on cent5/6
https://github.com/imeyer/ruby-1.9.3-rpm
I've stubbed out the sub packages in this PR:
https://github.com/imeyer/ruby-1.9.3-rpm/pull/16
the sub-packages don't actually do anything, but don't require changes
to
> Naive question: Why don't you provide one in yum.puppetlabs.com :-) ?
We provide a 1.8.7 that does what you're asking for EL 5s because we
dropped support in Puppet 3 for Ruby 1.8.5. I don't know if we have plans
to provide a 1.9.3 for any systems prior to us actually dropping support
for 1.8.7.
For RHEL derivatives one option might be Redhat's Software Collections. They
have added Ruby 1.9.3 support to RHEL through that. I have testing it out on
my todo list, but haven't made it that far yet. I'm not quickly finding a link
to the actual RPM, but here's their PDF about it:
https://a
Hi,
I'm (using CentOS 6.4 and I'm) suffering from an AFAIU performance/design
bug (http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/20865) which (althoughit's not
recommended as a work-around) does not occur when using Ruby-1.9.3 (Yaeh!)
instead of Ruby-1.8.7. I just can't find a public, well-known,
well-
13 matches
Mail list logo
