Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-13 Thread Trevor Vaughan
Heh, I will admit that I submitted an advanced topic at my first PuppetCamp and the result was that I lost 95% of the audience, 2 people actively went to sleep, and 6 folks in the back were absolutely thrilled that I had presented the content. So...yeah, I'm not sure what the right answer is. 1)

Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-13 Thread Gareth Rushgrove
On 13 April 2016 at 14:49, 'Tim Meusel' via Puppet Developers wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 02:15:57 UTC+2 schrieb Rob Nelson: >> >> >>> I'd also be remiss not to point out we've got way more scope to have >>> advanced talks at PuppetConf in the US and the CFP is open. >>> http://20

Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-13 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:49 AM, 'Tim Meusel' via Puppet Developers < puppet-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > That would be really cool. Most other conferences here handle it like > this: 45 or 60min talk -> 15min Q&A -> 15min break to change room (if there > are several parallel tracks). The spea

Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-13 Thread 'Tim Meusel' via Puppet Developers
Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 02:15:57 UTC+2 schrieb Rob Nelson: > > > I'd also be remiss not to point out we've got way more scope to have >> advanced talks at PuppetConf in the US and the CFP is open. >> http://2016.puppetconf.com/cfp-registration/ >> > > Speaking to the advanced realm, is

Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-13 Thread Trevor Vaughan
Hmm, fair enough. I think for the Advanced materials, you would want to have an up-front review and possibly have it run by a local representative (PUG owners?). That way, you can focus on the usual event and let the splinter run semi-independently. I've just been looking at some of the recent th

Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-12 Thread Rob Nelson
> I'd also be remiss not to point out we've got way more scope to have > advanced talks at PuppetConf in the US and the CFP is open. > http://2016.puppetconf.com/cfp-registration/ > Speaking to the advanced realm, is there any possibility of slots longer than 45 minutes? Even an extra 10 minut

Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-12 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > This is a tangent, but I would also like to see more advanced content at > the Puppet Camps. > > Would anyone be open to a dual tracked Puppet Camp? > > Beginner/Intermediate + Business and Advanced + Hackathon? > > Trevor >

Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-12 Thread Trevor Vaughan
Hi Nigel, This is a tangent, but I would also like to see more advanced content at the Puppet Camps. Would anyone be open to a dual tracked Puppet Camp? Beginner/Intermediate + Business and Advanced + Hackathon? Trevor On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > For those who don

Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-12 Thread Nigel Kersten
For those who don't know, I'm responsible for the Community team now at Puppet, and can answer some of this. On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Dean Wilson wrote: > > Next up European/London presence: Where is PuppetConf Europe? This is absolutely something we've talked about and would love to