Re: [Puppet Users] puppet kick failing

2012-02-24 Thread Dan Urist
ent on the client and now puppet kick is working. The errors were a bit cryptic, though... On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:29:17 -0700 Dan Urist wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:39:20 -0500 > Adam Heinz wrote: > > > I upgraded from puppet 0.25.5 to 2.6.12 recently and ended up doing > &g

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet kick failing

2012-02-24 Thread Dan Urist
rt for my test client, but I get the same result-- I can run the agent successfully from the client, but puppet kick fails with the same error. > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Dan Urist wrote: > > puppet kick ceased working for me when I upgraded to 2.6.3; I've > > also

[Puppet Users] puppet kick failing

2012-02-24 Thread Dan Urist
car.edu' did > not match server certificate; expected ca > vanilla.cms.ucar.edu finished with exit code 2 > Failed: vanilla.cms.ucar.edu I've tried using --vardir and --ssldir flags, as suggested by http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/11431, but get the same result. Has an

[Puppet Users] database server and port settings for puppet-dashboard

2011-10-05 Thread Dan Urist
running on the local host on the default port? -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-497-2459 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet repository from puppetlabs

2011-06-17 Thread Dan Urist
d email to > > puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send > > email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more > > options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > > -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-49

[Puppet Users] puppet user parameters

2011-02-04 Thread Dan Urist
>From http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/5620, it appears puppet now supports password_min_age and password_max_age parameters for the user resource, though these aren't documented at http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/types/user.html (should I file a bug for this?) Are these solaris-specifi

Re: [Puppet Users] Run stage introduces dependency cycle

2011-01-28 Thread Dan Urist
uration specific to vservers, so would prefer to keep it there). This seems like a reasonable use case for run stages. -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-497-2459 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this grou

Re: [Puppet Users] Run stage introduces dependency cycle

2011-01-28 Thread Dan Urist
em with this approach is that I wanted to keep that module as generic as possible so I can use it on other OS versions where this hack isn't necessary. Do you have a suggestion for a more general workaround? -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-497-2459 -- You received this message because you

Re: [Puppet Users] Run stage introduces dependency cycle

2011-01-28 Thread Dan Urist
I've entered a bug for this: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/6064 On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:01:53 -0700 Dan Urist wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:58:31 -0800 > Patrick wrote: > > > > > On Jan 28, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Dan Urist wrote: > > > > > Now,

Re: [Puppet Users] Run stage introduces dependency cycle

2011-01-28 Thread Dan Urist
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:58:31 -0800 Patrick wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Dan Urist wrote: > > > Now, if /etc/init/ssh.conf exists, puppet will correctly remove it > > and the run will complete without error, but on the *next* and all > > subsequent puppet r

[Puppet Users] Run stage introduces dependency cycle

2011-01-28 Thread Dan Urist
get no errors (on multiple runs). There are no explicit references to /etc/init/ssh.conf in any other modules (it's owned by the openssh-server package). So, is this a bug? -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-497-2459 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[Puppet Users] Exec dependent on directory

2010-09-28 Thread Dan Urist
f the directory), the exec doesn't get run. It runs with every puppetd invocation if I remove 'refreshonly => true'. I'm using puppet v.2.6.1 on Ubuntu Lucid. I could swear this used to work, and I thought this is/was a common technique. Am I missing something, or is this a

[Puppet Users] Re: nginx + passenger + puppetmaster

2010-09-23 Thread Dan Urist
3 Sep 2010 07:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Jakub Heichman wrote: > On 29 June, 19:44, Dan Urist wrote: > > I have this in my puppet.conf: > > > > [puppetmasterd] > > ssl_client_header = SSL_CLIENT_S_DN > > ssl_client_verify_header = SSL_CLIENT_VERIFY > >

[Puppet Users] Easiest way to create named pipes?

2010-09-15 Thread Dan Urist
#x27;s for? Or do I need to use mkfifo in an exec? -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-497-2459 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this gro

[Puppet Users] redmine workflow

2010-09-15 Thread Dan Urist
If I have an issue with status "Needs more information" and I've added more information, should I update the status to "Ready for testing"? I haven't submitted a patch, just more information. The only other option available to me is "Closed". -- Dan Uri

Re: [Puppet Users] files/templates from sub-modules

2010-09-13 Thread Dan Urist
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:13:06 -0700 Nigel Kersten wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Dan Urist wrote: > > Is it possible to have a sub-module that has its own files and > > templates directories? For example, if I create a sub-module > > base::logrotate with a te

[Puppet Users] files/templates from sub-modules

2010-09-10 Thread Dan Urist
en naming them PACKAGE_filename, but it would be much cleaner to have sub-modules for my "node" packages, named for their respective "package" modules, that would contain their files/templates. Hope that makes sense... -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-497-2459 -- You received

Re: [Puppet Users] file() function requires absolute paths?

2010-09-09 Thread Dan Urist
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:24:13 -0700 Jeff McCune wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Dan Urist wrote: > [snip] > > Does the file() function only support fully qualified > > paths? > > Yes. I recommend looking into copying the logic from the template() > functi

[Puppet Users] file() function requires absolute paths?

2010-09-09 Thread Dan Urist
lified". I've also tried a "puppet:///" URL and a relative path with the same result. Does the file() function only support fully qualified paths? This seems inconsistent, since the template() function appears to support at least relative paths according to http://docs.reductivel

Re: [Puppet Users] Errors in 2.6.1

2010-09-07 Thread Dan Urist
kes perfect sense. > What do you think makes more sense? To not present the parsing error > to the client at all? Or to continuously try and parse manifests even > though the server thinks that they have a parse error? Maybe cache the error for consistency if that's not too much wo

Re: [Puppet Users] variable set in site.pp not visible in nodes.pp

2010-09-03 Thread Dan Urist
s are no longer really global? Anyway, I've filed a bug: http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/4717 Thanks for your help. -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-497-2459 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, sen

Re: [Puppet Users] variable set in site.pp not visible in nodes.pp

2010-09-03 Thread Dan Urist
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:32:43 +0200 Peter Meier wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > >> I have another glitch with 2.6.1-rc2 that worked in 0.25-- I set a >> global variable in my site.pp that is used in my nodes.pp, but it's >>no >> longer set there, though it still is in m

[Puppet Users] variable set in site.pp not visible in nodes.pp

2010-09-02 Thread Dan Urist
I have another glitch with 2.6.1-rc2 that worked in 0.25-- I set a global variable in my site.pp that is used in my nodes.pp, but it's no longer set there, though it still is in my modules. Is this a bug, or a design change? -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-497-2459 -- You received

[Puppet Users] $name uppercased

2010-09-02 Thread Dan Urist
h isn't a major inconvenience but certainly isn't pretty. Should I report this as a bug, or was this an intended change that I missed? -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-497-2459 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. T

Re: [Puppet Users] auth failure under unicorn with 2.6.1rc2

2010-08-27 Thread Dan Urist
_s_dn; Thanks for your help. On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:34:03 +0200 Brice Figureau wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 15:09 -0600, Dan Urist wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:34:59 +0200 > > Brice Figureau wrote: > > > > > On 26/08/10 21:55, Dan Urist wrote: > > >

Re: [Puppet Users] auth failure under unicorn with 2.6.1rc2

2010-08-26 Thread Dan Urist
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:58:19 -0400 Mathias Gug wrote: > Hi, > > Excerpts from Brice Figureau's message of Thu Aug 26 16:34:59 -0400 > 2010: > > On 26/08/10 21:55, Dan Urist wrote: > > > I'm trying to set up a puppetmaster under unicorn using the ubuntu

Re: [Puppet Users] auth failure under unicorn with 2.6.1rc2

2010-08-26 Thread Dan Urist
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:34:59 +0200 Brice Figureau wrote: > On 26/08/10 21:55, Dan Urist wrote: > > I'm trying to set up a puppetmaster under unicorn using the ubuntu > > maverick packages (currently at version 2.6.1rc2), and I'm getting > >

[Puppet Users] auth failure under unicorn with 2.6.1rc2

2010-08-26 Thread Dan Urist
verything works: path / auth no allow * Has anyone seen this, or know of a workaround? -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-497-2459 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-u

Re: [Puppet Users] nginx + passenger + puppetmaster

2010-06-29 Thread Dan Urist
wrote: > On 28 June 2010 23:03, Dan Urist wrote: > > Has anyone gotten puppetmaster running under nginx with passenger? > > I've tried various permutations of setting headers in the nginx > > config file, but am still getting "Forbidden request" errors from >

[Puppet Users] nginx + passenger + puppetmaster

2010-06-29 Thread Dan Urist
Has anyone gotten puppetmaster running under nginx with passenger? I've tried various permutations of setting headers in the nginx config file, but am still getting "Forbidden request" errors from the client. -- Dan Urist dur...@ucar.edu 303-497-2459 -- You received this mess